Eccedentesiast مراسلہ: 9 جنوری 2011 Report Share مراسلہ: 9 جنوری 2011 Charges Leveled Against Imam Ahmed Raza.pdf اقتباس Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amin_Riaz مراسلہ: 7 فروری 2012 Report Share مراسلہ: 7 فروری 2012 From the above document.... Harsh By NatureThe opponents of Imam Ahmed Raza (alaihir rahmah) unleash a charge against him that he was harsh by nature. Imam Ahmed Raza (alaihir rahmah) was not harsh by nature. Rather the objection is harsh by nature. He was a great poet and a poet usually does not happen to be harsh by nature. More so, how would he beg excuse from the palanquin-bearer, who was a Sayyid if he were harsh by nature. How would he beg excuse from Sayyid Saheb whom he requested not to intervene in his home affairs, if he were harsh by nature. How would he refrain from declaring Maulvi Ismail Dehlawi Kaafir, if he were harsh by nature. He was very very kind. He was harsh only for those who were back-friends of Islam. Actually, he was a person strict not harsh. Friends of Islam always found the great Imam at their disposal. But fiends of Islam could not be his buttonhole. The opponents of Imam Ahmed Raza (alaihir rahmah) should not be harsh enough to call him harsh by nature. First, they must be kind enough themselves not to call him harsh. Objections such as these are unanswerable... and should be avoided. Besides not being well written - some of the answers are simply laughable. He was a great poet and a poet usually does not happen tobe harsh by nature. This is just nonsense. Even within poor academic circles... this would be laughed at. اقتباس Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
تجویز کردہ جواب
بحث میں حصہ لیں
آپ ابھی پوسٹ کرکے بعد میں رجسٹر ہوسکتے ہیں۔ اگر آپ پہلے سے رجسٹرڈ ہیں تو سائن اِن کریں اور اپنے اکاؤنٹ سے پوسٹ کریں۔
نوٹ: آپ کی پوسٹ ناظم کی اجازت کے بعد نظر آئے گی۔