Madani Munna

1. The Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat is the largest group of Muslims and the only group whose beliefs and teachings are truly in accordance with the Holy Quran and Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). 2. The beliefs of this group are the same as the beliefs of the Sahaba or noble companions of the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and the Salf-e-Saliheen (our great pious predecessors). 3. In many Ahadith, the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) strongly advised the Muslims to follow his Sunnah and to remain steadfast upon the path of his Sahaba, the Salf-e-Saliheen and the majority of Muslims to remain steadfast upon the way of the Ahle Sunnah. 4. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "I have left two things behind me for you (the Ummah). You will never go astray as long as you follow these two things. One of these two things is Allah's Holy Book (the Holy Quran) and the other is the Sunnah of his Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)." (Muwatta Imam Malik) 5. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said that after he passes away his Ummah should remain firmly steadfast upon his Sunnah and upon the way of his four Muslim Caliphs. He advised us to follow this path alone and to be beware of innovations, which contradict the Holy Quran and his Sunnah. (Abu Dawud; Tirmizi) 6. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "Follow the way of the largest group of Muslims! For, he who deviates from this group will be thrown into Hell!" (Ibn Majah) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REMAINING WITH THE AHLE SUNNAT WAL JAMAAT 1. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) advised us to remain firm with the largest group of Muslims and remain steadfast upon their way in beliefs and in actions. 2. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "Allah will never allow my Ummah to unite upon misguidance and incorrect beliefs. Allah's mercy, blessings and protection are with the largest group of Muslims. And he who deviates from this largest group of Muslims will be thrown into Hell." (Tirmizi) 3. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "He who deviates from the largest group of Muslims, even as much as a hand span, has himself cut off his connection with Islam". (Abu Dawud) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSTAINING FROM MISGUIDED GROUPS 1. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) clearly warned his Ummah to completely abstain from joining in the gatherings of or listening to the words of any of the other misguided groups that will appear amongst the Muslims, whose beliefs will contradict the beliefs of the largest group of Muslims. 2. The beliefs of the largest group of Muslims will be in accordance with the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the beliefs of the Sahaba and the Salf-e-Saliheen. 3. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "In the period prior to the Day of Judgement, false and deceitful groups will emerge. They will say things to you, which neither you nor your forefathers will have ever heard before. Stay away from these deceitful people and do not let them come near you! Do not be misguided by them and do not let them cause strife amongst you!" (Sahih Muslim) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DIVISIONS IN THE UMMAH 1. The concept of the Muslim nation separating into 73 sects, is taken from authentic Ahadith such as the following related by Hazrat Abu Hurairah (radi Allahu anhu): "The Messenger of Allah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: 'The Jews separated into 71 sects, and the Christians into 72, and my nation will divide into 73 sects.'" (Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah) 2. The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "Seventy-two (of the 73 sects of the Muslim nation) will be in the fire, and only one will be in Paradise; it is the Jama'ah (i.e. Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah)." (Abi Dawud, Ad-Darimi, Ahmad) 3. There is another narration which states: "The Companions asked: 'Which sect will triumph (i.e. achieve salvation)?' The Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) replied: 'The sect which adheres to that (set of beliefs and practices) which I and my Companions adhere to.'" 4. It should be clear from these Ahadith that the one sect, out of the 73, which is to gain salvation, is the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah, the only segment of the Muslim community which adheres to that which the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and his Companions (radi Allahu anhum) adhered to. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OPINION OF GREAT SCHOLARS AND SAINTS 1. Ghousal Azam, Hazrat Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani (radi allahu anhu) states: "There are 73 groups as foretold by Sayyiduna Rasoolallah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and (bear in mind that), the Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat was the rightful group". (Ghunyatut Taalibeen) 2. Imam Ghazzali (radi Allahu anhu) writes: "The Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat is the successful Firqah (group) and it is this Firqa which weighs or determines its thoughts and its according to the scales of the Holy Quran". (Mujarribaate Imam Ghazal) 3. Hazrat Sha Wali'ullah Muhaddith Dehlawi (radi Allahu anhu) states: "As Rasoolallah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has stated, follow this 'Sawad-e-Azam', and when the four Madhabs are within the Sawad-e-Azam then the following of any one of them, is followance of the Sawad-e-Azam. Therefore, refuting any one of them is refuting the Sawad-e-Azam". (Aqdul Jayyad) 4. Imam Sufyan Souri (radi Allahu anhu) states: "By Sawad-e-Azam is meant those who are called the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat". (Al Mizaanul Qubra) 5. Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddith Dehlawi (radi Allahu anhu) states in his book "Fatawa Azeezi" (Vol. 2, pg. 4) that: "The various parts of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat in Aqaa'id such as the Ash'ariya, the Maaturadi, in Fiqh such as the Hanifa, the Shafi'i, the Hambali, in Tassawwaf such as the Qaaderi, the Chisti, Naqshabandi, the Suhurwardi, this servant considers all of them to be the truth". 6. Imam Rabbani, Mujaddid Alif Thaani (radi allahu anhu) states in the second chapter, page 67 of his "Maktubaat Shareef" that: "The way of salvation is followance of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat. May Almighty Allah Ta'ala bestow blessings upon the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, in their speech, in their actions, laws, for this is the successful group. Besides this, all other groups have become victims of deception. Today, nobody realises how much these misled groups will be punished, however, on the Day of Qiyamah this secret will become apparent. Even though at that time this knowledge will be of no benefit to the misled.

QADIANIS DEBASE THE ISLAMIC KALIMAH This article draws special attention of the reader to the fact that the Qadianis deem Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a Prophet incarnate through reincarnation, ie rebirth of the holy Prophet of Islam in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's person. Thus they have rebelled against Islam and seceded from it. They have infactgiven the pretender a place higher than that of the holy Prophet . The contents of this text are based on authenic Qadiani literature with references to the relevant book and page. We take full responsibility and do hereby declare that the sources are authentic and correct. To Qadianis Muhammad is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Himself Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claims that he himself is (na-auzoo-billah) Muhammad : Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. and those who are with him are strong against Unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each other. (HQ 48.29) Mirza said, "In this divine revelation (the above verse) I have been named Muhammad as well as the Messenger of Allah". (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.3;Roohani Khazain vol.18, p.207). The So-Called Two Prophetic Appointments Of Muhammad The reasons why the Qadianis deem Mirza to be Muhammad is that according to the Qadiani belief, `Khatam un Nabieen' (the final Prophet ) had been ordained to be born in Mecca as Muhammad. For the second time, according to the Qadianis, he was reincarnated in Qadian as Mirza Ghulam Ahmad ! In other words, the spirt of Muhammad along with his prophetic accomplishments allegedly appeared a second tme in the incarnation of Mirza. And we quote: "And know that just as our holy Prophet was born in the 5th century, in the same way he was reborn in the end of 19th century in the incarnation of the Promised Masih" (Mirza). (khutbah-e-Ilhamiah,p.180; Roohani Khazain, vol.16,p270) "The holy Prophet had two births as a Prophet. In other words, we may say that it was promised that the holy Prophet would be born in the world once and once more reincarnated and this was fulfilled by the incarnation of the promised Masih and the promised Mahdi" (Mirza). (Tuhfa-e-Golravia, p94; footnote, Roohani Khazian, vol.17,p.249) Mirza of Qadian Claimed To Be The Same As Muhammad According to Qadiani belief Muhammad with all his excellence was reincarnated in Mirza of Qadian. As such the entity of Mirza of Qadian is (na-uzoo-billah)the same as the entity of Muhammad . Mirza has said: "And Allah bestowed upon me the bounty of the holy Prophet and made it perfect, and he drew towards me the kindness and generosity of that merciful Prophet, so much so that my entity became his entity. Thus he who joins my Jamaat really becomes one of the Sahaba of my chief who was better then all the Prophets. It is not hidden from those with the ability to think that this is what the words "others of them" mean. The person who makes a difference between me and Mustafa has neither seen me nor recoginised me". (Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, p.171; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.258-259). Mirza of Qadian Claimed That He Posessed All The Virtues And Excellence Of Muhammad Once the belief had been fabricated that the being of Mirza is exactly the being of Muhammad and that it is Muhammad himself who was reincarnated in Qadian as Mirza, then it must also be alleged that all the accomplishments and distinctions of Muhammad were transferred to Mirza. Mirza has said: "When I am the holy Prophet incarnate and when all the accomplishments of Muhammad including the prophethood are reflected in my mirror of my shadiness, then who is the man who has claimed prophethood in a seperate being ?" (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.8; Roohani Khazain, vol.18,p.212) "The entity of the promised Masih (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the holy Prophet . In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised Masih and the holy Prophet . Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name. Although verbally they are two, yet in reality they are one and the same". (Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol.3, No.37, dated 16th September 1915, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab page 207, 9th edition, Lahore) Mirza Of Qadian Claimed That He Was The Final Prophet According to the Qadiani belief, the "Qadiani based" birth of Muhammad as a prophet took place in the incarnate AUTAR, Mirza of Qadian. And as he became incarnate of Muhammad then Miraz becomes the "final prophet" too ! Mirza says: I have told so many times that according to the verse: "And others of them.." I am incarnate the last of the Prophets. Twenty years ago Allah named me in Braheen-e-Ahamadia, Muhammad and AHmad and declared that I am the holy Prophets incarnation. (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.8; Roohani Khazain vol.18; p212) "Blessed is he who has recognised me. Of all the paths to God I am the last path, and of all his Lights, I am the last Light. Unfortunate is he who forsakes me, because without me all is darkness". (Kashti-e-Nooh, p.56; Roohani Khazain, vol.19, p.61). Mirza of Qadian Claimed He Was The Best Of The Prophets Of Allah "Many thrones have descended from heaven but thy throne has been placed the highest". (Tazkirah 2nd Ed, p.643) "The various accomplishments which were bestowed upon all other Prophets were concentrated in a greater degree in the holy Prophet. All those accomplishments have been conferred on me through the holy Prophets reincarnation in me. That is why I bear the names of Adam, Abraham, Moses, Noah, Solomon, Jesus, etc. Allthe previous Prophets were the incarnations of special attributes of the holy Prophet but I am the the reincarnation of all the attributes of the holy Prophet". (Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol.3, P.270) Mirza of Qadian Claimed That He Was Superior To Muhammad The Qadianis believe that Mirzas reincarnation was superior to the Prophets first birth in Mecca. Mirza says: One who denies that the orainment of the Prophet is related to the 6th thousand as it was related to the 5th thousand, denies the truth and the mandate of the Quran. the truth is that the spirituality of the (reincarnated) holy Prophet at the end of the 6th thousand (ie these days), is much more stronger, more complete and severe than in those early years. rathe it is like the 14th (moonlit) night". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, p181; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.271-272) The Simile Of "The New Moon" Used For The Holy Prophet And That Of "The Full Moon" Used For Mirza The superiority of the Qadiani incarnation has been expressed in yet another style: viz. During the Meccan age the holy Prophet , Isalm was like the Crescent in which there is no light but in his so-called Qadiani reincarnation, Islam became lighted and illuminated like the full moon. Mirza said: "And Islam started like the cescent which was destined ultimately to become in the later ages the full moon by the command of God. Thus Allahs wisdom willed that Islam should asume the form of the full moon in that century which sholud resemble the full moon by way of counting". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, p181; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, p.275) "To declare those who denied the holy Prophet in his first birth as unbelievers and outside the fold of Islam, but to regard the deniers of his second birth as muslim is an insult to the Prophet and a joke against the signs of Allah, although the promised Masih has in Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, compared the mutual relation between the first and the second births of the holy Prophet to the relationship between the crescent and the full moon". (Akhbar Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol.3, No.10, dated 15th July 1915 as cited in Qadiani Mazhab p262) Greater Manifest Victory In order to express the superiority of Mirza it was calimed that the manifest victory achieved by Mirza was greater then the manifest victory of the holy Prophet . Thus Mirza said "It is apparent that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It ws ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, pp193-194(Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, p.288) SO-CALLED BEGINNING AND PERFECTION OF MIRZA'S SPIRITUAL EXCELLENCE It was also claimed that the era of the Makki birth of the holy Prophet was only the first step in his progress of spiritual attainments, whereas his Qadiani reincarnation represents the highest pinnacle of his spiritual development. Thus it is said: "The spirituality of our holy Prophet was conceived 5th thousand (ie Makki birth) with its precise attributes and that period was not the the climax of his spirituality's development. It was rather the first step to the highest pinnacle of its perfection. Thereafter this spirituality manifested itself in its full glamour during the 6th thousand [his rebirth in Qadian] at the present time". (Khutba-e-llhamiah, p177; Roohani Khazain, Vol.16, p.266) THE SO CALLED SUPERIOR MENTAL DEVELOPMENT OF MIRZA It is also claimed that the mental development of Mirza of Qadian was superior to that of the holy Prophet . Thus it is said: "The mental development of the promised Masih (i.e. the Mirza of Qadian) was higher than that of the holy Prophet . And this is only a part of the superiority which the promised Masih has over the holy Prophet. The mental faculties of the holy Prophet could not manifest fully owing to the deficiency of civilization; although the ability existed. They have now manifested themselves fully through the promised Masih by virtue of the advancement of civilization." (Review, May 1929, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab, p.266, ninth edition. Lahore) QADIANIS TERM REClTERS OF KALIMAH OF MUHAMMAD AS KAFIR(!) When it is admitted, according to the Qadiani belief, that the Qadiani Mirza is (God forbid) superior to Muhammad of Arabia in dignity then it must also be necessary to believe that those who recite the Kalimah of Muhammad are not Muslims. In other words. the Kalimae Tayyibah, (La Illaha Ill-lah, Muhammadur Rasoolullah), without belief in the Qadiani Mirza becomes false. Thus it is said: "The point is now quite clear. If it is 'Kufr' to deny the gracious Prophet it must also be 'Kufr' to deny the promised Masih, because the promised Masih is in no way a separate being from the gracious Prophet; rather he is the same (Muhammad incarnate). If anyone is not deemed a Kaflr for denying the promised Masih, then anyone else who denies the gracious Prophet also cannot be considered a Kafir. How is it possible that denying him in his first birth as Prophet should be regarded as Kufr, but denying him in his (reincarnated) second birth as prophet should not be regarded as Kufr, when, as claimed by the promised Masih, his (Mirza's as Muhammad incarnate) spiritual attainment is stronger, complete and severe." (Kalimatul Fasl, pages 146-147, as cited in the Reuiew of Religions, dated March-April 1915). "Any person who believes in Moses but does not believe in Christ, or believes in Christ but does not believe in Muhammad, or believes in Muhammad but does not believe in the promised Masih, is not only a Kafir, but a 'pakka' (confirmed) Kafir, and (he is) out of the fold of Islam." (Kalimatul Fasl, page 110, by Mirza Bashir Ahmad, M.A.) "The Ahmadi movement bears the same relationship to Islam as Christianity bears to Judaism." (Muhammad Ali Lahori Qadiani cited from Mubahasah Rawalpindi, page 240). "All such Muslims as did not swear allegiance to the promised Masih (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian), even though they did not hear the name of the promised Masih, are Kafir and debarred from the fold of Islam." (Aiena-e-Sadaqat, page 35, by Mirza Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani). "It is incumbent upon us that we should not regard non-Ahmadis as Muslims, nor should we offer prayers behind them, because according to our belief they deny one of the prophets of Allah. This is a matter of faith None has any discretion in this." (Anwar-e-Khilafat, page 90, by Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani). THE SO-CALLED QADIANI KALIMAH It also became necessary in the Qadiani strategy to include the Qadiani Mirza in the meaning of the Qadiani Kalimah: Thus it is said: "As a result of the birth of the promised Masih (the Qadiani Mirza) a difference has cropped up (in the meaning of the Kalimah). Before the birth of the promised Masih (the Qadiani Mirza) in the world as a prophet, the words Muhammad ur Rasul Allah) included in their meaning only such prophets as had preceded him; but after the incarnation of the promised Masih (the Qadiani Mirza) in the world as a prophet, one more prophet has been added to the meaning of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah. Therefore on account of the incarnation of the promised Masih the Kalimah, God forbid, does not become abolished; it rather shines more brightly. In short, the same Kalimah is (effective) even now for embracing Islam, with the only difference that the incarnation of the promised Masih (Mirza Qadiani) has added one more prophet to the meaning of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah". (Kalimatul Fasl, page 158, by Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani). In short, the Qadiani Religion has retained the same words of the Kalimah but the Qadiani belief has changed the meaning of the Kalimah. In the Kalimah of the Muslims Muhammad ur Rasul Allah means Muhammad of Arabia but in the Qadiani Kalimah Muhammad ur Rasul Allah means Mirza Qadiani as Muhammad incarnate, reborn in the world as a prophet for the second time. Thus it is said: "Moreover, even if we accept by supposing the impossible that the sacred name of the gracious Prophet has been included in the sacred Kalimah because he is the last of the Prophets, even then there is no harm and we do not need a new Kalimah because the promised Masih is not a separate entity from the gracious Prophet as he (Mirza) himself says: "My being is exactly the being of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah". Also, "One who discriminates between me and Mustafa has neither recognized me nor seen me". And the reason for this is Allah Almighty's promise that He would reincarnate "Khatam un Nabieen" in this world once more as a prophet as is evident from the verse "And others of them... Thus the promised Masih (Mirza of Qadian) is himself Muhammad ur Rasulullah, who has been incarnated in the world again to spread Islam. We do not, therefore, need any new Kalimah. Albeit, a new Kalimah would have been necessary, if some other person had been reincarnated instead of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah. So contemplate!" (Kalimatul Fasl, page 158). QADIANI BELIEF: PROPHETHOOD OF MUHAMMAD STANDS ABROGATED AND HIS KALIMAH STANDS CANCELLED A little thought on the above-cited passages makes it quite clear that not only do the Qadianis consider Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a Prophet and Messenger (of Allah) but they also consider Mirza of Qadian a complete incarnation of Muhammad and as such recite his (Mirza's) Kalimah. They consider as Kafirs all those who recite the Kalimah of Muhammad of Arabia . This proves that for the Qadianis the Kalimah of Muhammad of Arabia stands cancelled. If we look more closely into the issue we shall find that according to the Qadiani belief-like that of the Bahais - the period of the Prophethood and Apostleship of Muhammad of Arabia has expired and it stands repealed for all practical purposes, because according to the Qadiani belief the basis of salvation lies in obeying the Qadiani Mirza only. So Mirza said: "Say to them: if you love God then come and obey me so that God also may love you". (Mirza Qadiani's "revelation as cited in Haqiqatul Wahi, Page 79/82, Lahore, 1952; Roohani Khazain. Vol. 22, p. 82. Also see pages 46, 62, 81, 182, 205, 277, 360, 363, 378, 395, 495, 630, 634, in Tazkirah, 2nd Edition). "In Braheen-e-Ahmadia, God has called me by the name of Ibrahim, as He said: "This means: Salutation on Ibrahim (i.e. this humble man [Mirza]). We truly made friends with him and saved him from every sorrow. And O ye who follow, let the place of Ibrahim's footsteps be the place of your prayers. That is, obey completely so that you may attain salvation." (Arbaeen, Vol. 3, pp. 30-31; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 420). "As regards the assertion (verse from Quran regarding Ibraham) this is a verse of the holy Quran. Here it means: Perform your prayers and hold beliefs on the pattern of Ibrahim (i.e. Mirza Qadiani) who has been sent, and mould yourself on his model in every matter". (Arbaeen, Vol. 3, p. 31; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p.42). "Similar is the verse (same verse quoted above) which contains a hint that at a time when the Ummat-e-Muhammadia will become divided into many sects, then during the last era an Ibrahim (i.e. Mirza Qadiani) will be born and out of all the sects, the sect which follows this Ibrahim, (i.e. Mirza!), will be saved". (Arbaeen, Vol. 3, page 32; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 4213. "My teachings contain orders as well as prohibitions and renovation of important injunctions of the Shari'at. For this reason God has named my teachings and the 'wahi' (revelation) that comes to me as a 'boat. Thus see, God has declared my 'wahi', my teachings and allegiance with me to be Noah's Ark and the basis of salvation for all human beings. Let he who has eyes may see and he who has ears may hear." (Arbaeen, Vol. 4, footnote of page 6; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 435). Thus obedience to Mirza Qadiani's prophethood, teachings, 'wahi' and his renovated Shari'at is allegedly the only basis for salvation for all mankind. This only means, that the Shari'at of Muhammad of Arabia , his teachings and 'wahi" are no longer the basis of salvation. In other words, Mirza's incarnation has rendered all these useless, suspended and abolished! THE PRE MIRZA ISLAM IS THE 'DEAD RELIGION The above-cited quotations confirm beyond a shadow of doubt that in the opinion of the Qadianis, lslam without the Qadiani Mirza is dead. So it is said: "Probably in the year 1906, at the proposal of Khwaja Kamaluddin, Moulvi Muhammad Ali entered into an agreement with the Editor of Akhbar-e-Watan to the effect that the Review of Religions would publish no articles about the (Qadiani) sect; it would only publish general articles on Islam and the Editor of the Watan would propagate in his paper for the assistance of the Journal, Review of Religions. The promised Masih disapproved this proposal and it was strongly opposed by the Jamaat also. Hazrat Sahib said: 'Will you present dead Islam before the world by excluding me?" (Zikr-e-Habib by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Qadiani page 146, First Edition, Qadian). "We believe that a religion which does not have the chain of prophethood (as in Islam-- Compiler) is a dead religion. We call the religions of the Jews, the Christians and the Hindus dead only because now there are no prophets in them. If this were the position in Islam too, we would be no more than mere story-tellers. Why do we regard it superior to other religions? It must have some distinction". (Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol. 10, page 127). "During the lifetime of the promised Masih (Mirza Qadiani), at the proposal of Moulvi Muhammad Ali and Khwaj a Kamaluddin, the Editor of Akhbar-e-Watan started a fund-collecting scheme in 1905 for the purpose of sending copies of the Review of Religions to foreign countries, on the condition that it should not contain the name of the promised Masih (Mirza Qadiani). But 'hazrate aqdas' (Mirza Qadiani) rejected this proposal saying: Will you present dead Islam by excluding me?' Thereupon, the Editor Watan announced the closure of this fund-collecting scheme". (Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol. 16, No. 32, dated 19th October, 1928, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab, pages 461-462). QADIANIS DENOUNCE ISLAM AS THE 'CURSED, SATANIC AND CONTEMIBLE RELIGION According to the Qadiani belief, the Religion of Islam, without the prophet hood of Mirza Qadiani, is only a 'collection of tales', it is a 'cursed, satanic and contemptible religion'. "That religion is no religion and that prophet is no prophet by following whom a man does not come so close to God as to be honoured with divine conversation (i.e. Prophethood - Compiler). That religion is cursed and contemptible which teaches that human progress depends only on a few narrated anecdotes (i.e. the Shari'at-e-Muhammadia which is narrated from the holy Prophet - Compiler) and that the 'wahi' has lagged behind instead of going ahead ........ Hence such a religion deserves to be called satanic rather than divine." (i.e. Islam of the holy Prophet is, God forbid, Satanic - Translator). (Zamima-e-Braheen-e-Ahmadia, Part V, pages 138-139; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 21, p. 306). QADIANI ARROGANCE "How absurd and false it is to believe that after the holy Prophet the door of the divine 'wahi' has been closed for ever and there i8 no hope of it in the future till the Day of Resurrection - only worship tales. Can a religion having no direct trace of Almighty Allah be called a religion? I say, by Almighty God, that in this age there is no one more disgusted than myself with such a religion. (There is no doubt about this.- Compiler). I name such a religion as satanic religion, not divine (religion)". (Zamima-e-Braheen-e-Ahmadia, Part V, page 183; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 21, p. 354). The above-cited incontrovertible proofs indicate beyond the slightest doubt that Qadianism is an entirely different religion from Islam. The reality of the Qadiani religion is that if you accept the Qadiani Mirza as Prophet then it is all right, otherwise the Religion of Islam is abused as being dead, cursed, satanic and contemptible, and the Prophethood and Apostleship of Muhammad too is denied. May not Almighty Allah deprive anyone of Wisdom and Faith! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Identification of the Prophesied Imam Mahdi The Holy Prophet Muhammad has prophesied about several events that will occur just before the advent of the day of judgment. Among these, Rasulullah has foretold the advent of one of his descendants, Al Mahdi (the guided one), which will materialize when the believers are severely oppressed in every corner of the world. He will fight the oppressors, unite the Muslims, bring peace and justice to the world, rule over the Arabs, and lead a prayer in Mekkah at which Isa (pbuh)(Jesus) will be present. Throughtout the history of Islam, a few individuals -- driven either by the desperate state of Muslims in their community or a selfish pursuit of power and prestige -- laid claim to being Mahdi and found a following among the uninformed masses, looking for salvation from heavens. For some of these individuals (like Bab of Iran or Mirza Ghulam of India) the claim to being Mahdi was just a stepping stone to the development of heretic sects which broke away from the fold of Islam. Thus, it is at least prudent to visit the fatcs of this prophecy and avoid falling pray to false claimants that will appear from time to time. As Muslims, we should remember that the prophecy about Mahdi is one that will come to pass. This prophecy, however, does not absolve the Muslim ummah from its duty to strive in the cause of Allah (SWT), oppose injustice, and seek peace and betterment of human condition. Centuries have passes from the time of the holy Prophet and there is a good possibility that many more will expire before the advent of Al Mahdi. Muslims who are negligent in their duty hoping for a savior are committing a grave mistake and are not following the divine decrees ordained in Quran or taught by Rasulullah . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following are the collection of Sahih (authentic) Hadith regarding Mahdi. Hadhrat Abdullah bin Mas'ood reports from the Prophet , who said: "The world will not come to pass until a man from among my family, whose name will be my name, rules over the Arabs." (Tirmidhi Sahih, Vol. 9, P. 74; Abu Dawud, Sahih, Vol. 5, P. 207; also narrated by Ali b. Abi Talib, Abu Sa'id, Umm Salma, Abu Hurayra) The Prophet said: "Allah will bring out from concealment al-Mahdi from my family and just before the day of Judgment; even if only one day were to remain in the life of the world, and he will spread on this earth justice and equity and will eradicate tyranny and oppression." (Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Vol. 1, P. 99) Hadhrat Ali narrates that Rasulullah said: "Even if only a day remains for Qiyamah to come, yet Allah will surely send a man from my family who will fill this world with such justice and fairness, just as it initially was filled with oppression." (Abu Dawood) Ali b. Abi Talib has related a tradition from the Prophet who informed him: "The promised Mahdi will be among my family. God will make the provisions for his emergence within a single night." (Ibn Majah, Sahih, Vol. 2, P. 519) Hazrat Umme Salmah , Prophet's wife, narrates that she heard the Prophet say: "The promised Mahdi will be among my progeny, among the descendants of Fatima." (Abu Dawud, Sahih, Vol. 2, P. 207; Ibn Majah, Sahih, Vol. 2, P. 519) Rasulullah announced: The Mahdi will be of my family, of the descendants of Fatima (the Prophet's daughter). (Sunan Ibn Majah, Vol. 2, Tradition No. 4086) The Prophet told: "al-Mahdi is one of us, the members of the household (Ahlul-Bayt)." (Sunan Ibn Majah, Vol. 2, Tradition No. 4085) Abu Sa'id al-Khudari narrated that the Prophet said: "Our Mahdi will have a broad forehead and a pointed (prominent) nose. He will fill the earth with justice as it is filled with injustice and tyranny. He will rule for seven years." (Abu Dawud, Sahih, Vol. 2, p. 208; Fusul al-muhimma, p. 275) Hadhrat Abu Saeed Khudri relates that Rasulullah said: "Al Mahdi will be from my progeny. His forehead will be broad and his nose will be high. He will fill the world with justice and fairness at a time when the world will be filled with oppression. He will rule for seven years." Hadhrat Umme Salmah narrates that Rasulullah said: "After the death of a Ruler there will be some dispute between the people. At that time a citizen of Madina will flee (from Madina) and go to Makkah. While in Makkah, certain people will approach him between Hajrul Aswad and Maqaame Ibraheem, and forcefully pledge their allegiance to him. Thereafter a huge army will proceed from Syria to attack him but when they will be at Baida, which is between Makkah and Madina, they will be swallowed into the ground. On seeing this, the Abdaals of Shaam as well as large numbers of people from Iraq will come to him and pledge their allegiance to him. Then a person from the Quraish, whose uncle will be from the Bani Kalb tribe will send an army to attack him, only to be overpowered, by the will of Allah. This (defeated) army will be that of the Bani Kalb. Unfortunate indeed is he who does not receive a share from the booty of the Kalb. This person (Imam Mahdi) will distribute the spoils of war after the battle. He will lead the people according to the Sunnat and during his reign Islam will spread throughout the world. He will remain till seven years (since his emergence). He will pass away and the Muslims will perform his Janazah salaat." (Abu Dawood) The holy Prophet said: "A group of my Ummah will fight for the truth until near the day of judgment when Jesus, the son of Marry, will descend, and the leader of them will ask him to lead the prayer, but Jesus declines, saying: "No, Verily, among you Allah has made leaders for others and He has bestowed his bounty upon them." (Sahih Muslim) It is reported from Abu Hurayra that the Prophet said: "What will be your reaction when the son of Mary (Jesus) descends and your Imam is from among yourselves?" (Sahih Muslim, bab nuzul 'isa, Vol. 2; Sahih Bukhari, kitab bad' al-khalq wa nuzul 'isa, Vol. 4) The holy Prophet said: "What would be your situation if the Son of Mary (i.e. Jesus) descends upon you and your Imam is from among you?" (Bukhari, kitabul-Anbiya, Chapter Nuzul Isa bin Maryam) According to these reliable, authentic, and universally accepted narrations, Mahdi will: Be from among the family of Prophet , among the descendants of Fatima; Have a broad forehead and pointed noise; Appear in one night; Appear just before the day of judgment; Have same name as hazrat Muhammad ; Escape from Madina to Makkah where people will pledge allegiance to him; Receive pledge and help of Iraqi people; Fight in battles; Rule over the Arabs for seven years according to Sunnah; Spread justice and equity on earth; Eradicate tyranny and oppression; Lead a prayer in Mekkah which Jesus (pbuh) will follow in; NOT be the same individual as the Promised Messiah (Jesus). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following narrations have been taken from books on which there is no consensus among Muslim scholars. Their authenticity is in question. The holy Prophet said: "The world will not come to an end until a man from my family (ahl al-bayt), who will be called al-Mahdi, emerges to rule upon my community." (Bihar al-anwar, Vol. 51, P. 75; Ithbat al-hudat, Vol. 1, P. 9) Umme Salmah , the wife of the Prophet, has related a tradition of the Prophet : "Mahdi will be among my progeny, among the children of Fatima." (Bihar al-anwar, Vol. 51, P. 75) Rasullullah said: "The world will not come to an end until a man from the descendants of Hussain takes charge of the affairs of the world and fills it with justice and equity as it is filled with injustice and tyranny." (Bihar al-anwar, Vol. 51, P. 66) Abu Sa'id al-Khudari has related a tradition from the Prophet who declared: "The earth will be filled with injustice and corruption. At that time, a man from among my progeny will rise and will rule for seven or nine years and will fill the earth with justice and equity." (Ahmad b. Hanbal, Musnad, Vol. 3, P. 27) Abu al-Hujaf quotes the Prophet saying three times: "Listen to the good news about the Mahdi! He will rise at the time when people will be faced with severe conflict and the earth will be hit by a violent quake. He will fill the earth with justice and equity as it is filled with injustice and tyranny. He will fill the hearts of his followers with devotion and will spread justice everywhere." (Bihar al-anwar, Vol. 51, P. 74) Ali b. Abi Talib said, I asked the Prophet : "Is Mahdi going to be among our own family or from some other?" He replied: "He will be among us. God will conclude His religion through him, just as He began it with us. It will be through us that people will find refuge from sedition, just as it was through us that they were saved from polytheism. Moreover, it will be through us that God will bring their hearts together in brotherhood following the animosity sown by the sedition, just as they were brought together in brotherhood in their religion after the animosity sown by polytheism." (Bihar al-anwar, Vol. 51, P. 84; Ithbat al-hudat, Vol. 7, P. 191; Majma` al-zawa'id by `Ali b. Abi Bakr Haythami (Cairo edition), Vol. 7, P. 317) I heard the Prophet declare from the pulpit: "The Mahdi from among my descendants, from my family, will rise at the End of Time, while the heavens will pour rain and the earth will bring forth green grass for him. He will fill the earth with justice and equity as it is filled with tyranny and injustice." (Bihar al-anwar, Vol. 51, P. 74; Ithbat al-hudat, Vol. 7, P. 9) Abu Sa'id al-Khudari narrated that Prophet said: "Severe calamity from the direction of their ruler will befall my people during the Last Days. It will be a calamity which, in severity, shall be unprecedented. It will be so violent that the earth with injustice and corruption will shrivel for its inhabitants. The believers will not find refuge from oppression. At that time God will send a man from my family to fill the earth with justice and equity just as it is filled with injustice and tyranny. The dwellers of the heavens and the earth will be pleased with him. The earth will bring forth all that grows for him, and the heavens will pour down rains in abundance. He will live among the people for seven or nine years. From all the good that God will bestow on the inhabitants of the earth, the dead will wish to come to life again." (Ibn Hajar, al-Sawa'iq al-muharriqa, P. 161; Yanabi' al-mawadda, Vol. 2, P. 177) Abu Hurayra narrated on behalf of the Prophet : "People will pay allegiance to the Mahdi between rukn and maqam (in Mekkah)." (Ibn Tawus, Kitab al-malahim wa al-fitan, P. 64.) According to these hadith, Mahdi will: Be from the Family of Prophet and descend from Hussain , son of Fatima ; Appear at the end of time; Appear when earth is filled with injustice and tyranny and believers are severely oppressed; Appear when a severe earthquaker will occur and green grass will grow (presumably in Arabia); Fill the earth with justice and equity; Spread brotherhood, equity, and devotion among Muslims; Rule over Muslim community, according to Hadith, for seven or nine years; Live and act with the qualities of the holy Prophet . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following are narrations not attribute to the Holy Prophet and only represent second hand narrations attributed to companions of the holy Prophet . Thus, they are included only for completeness and are unreliable. Ammar Yasir has related: "At the time when Nafs al-Zakiyya is killed a caller from the heaven will say: 'Your commander is so-and-so.' (announce Mahdi) Following it the Mahdi will emerge and fill the earth with justice and equity." (Ibn Tawus, Kitab al-malahim wa al-fitan, P. 179) Abd Allah b. Umar mentioned the name of Mahdi in the presence of an Arab who said: Mahdi is Mu'awiya b. Abu Sufyan. Abd Allah said: "It is not as you say. Mahdi is a person behind whom Jesus will offer his prayers." (Ibn Tawus, Kitab al-malahim wa al-fitan, P. 179) Mujahid said about Mahdi: "One of the Prophet's companions told me that the Mahdi will not appear until that time when Nafs al-Zakiyya will be killed. At that time he will take the command and will fill the earth with justice and equity." (Ibn Tawus, Kitab al-malahim wa al-fitan, P. 171) Nufayl's daughter Umayra narrates that she heard Hasan b. Ali's daughter saying: "This affair about which you are waiting will not occur until among you some seek to distance themselves from the others and curse each other." (Majlisi, Bihar al-anwar, Vol. 52, P. 211) Salma b. Zafar reports that one day people were talking about the appearance of the Mahdi in the presence of Hudhayfa. Hudhayfa said: "If Mahdi has indeed appeared while you are living close to the Prophet's period and while his companions are living among you, then you are truly fortunate. However, that is not the case. Mahdi will not appear until people are devoured by oppression and tyranny and there is no one absent more beloved and more needed than him." (Kitab al-hawi li al-fatawa, Vol. 2, P. 159) These narrations are based on opinion of single individuals and are not reliable. However, they indicate that Mahdi might: Not appear until all Muslims are divided and curse each other (i.e. no brotherhood); Appear when tyranny and oppression rule and no Muslim is free; Be announced by a voice from heavens; Fill the earth with justice and equity; Lead the prayer which Jesus (pbuh) will follow. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following narration has not been attributed to the Holy Prophet . It has been identified as false and has been rejected by Muslim scholars for centuries. Amr son of Shamer quoted Jabir, who quoted Mohammed bin Ali to have said: "For our Mahdi, there are two signs. Since the birth of Universe, these events have never taken place. Those two signs are that there will be Lunar Eclipse on the first night of Ramadhan and Solar Eclipse in the middle of Ramadhan." (Dar-e-Qatni, Vol. 1, P.188) Note: This narration is not attributed to holy Prophet , but attributed to Mohammed bin Ali. No other person has substantiated this alleged statement of Mohammed bin Ali. Muslim scholars have always rejected this and other narrations of Amr and Jabir, as both have been known to transmit unreliable and forged narrations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Difference between Qadianis and Muslims I want to tell you briefly how Qadianis differ from other 'Kafirs'. But before Ido so, I shall answer a question which is in the minds of some of the Ummah THE QUESTION (In 3 Parts): Firstly: Why is it that an organization called Aalami Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat has been set up, specifically aiming to pursue Qadianis to whichever part of the world they go and expose them by Allah's help and with the cooperation of Muslim brethren when there are other non- Muslims also in the world, such as Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc? Secondly: Why is there no such organization against any other 'Kafir' community? Thirdly: What was the reason for such stalwarts of Islam as Imam-ul'asr Muhammad Anwar Shah Kashmiri, Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Binnori, Ameer-e-Shariat Ataullah Shah Bukhari, and Hazrate Aqdas Maulana Mufti Mahmood, (Allah's mercy on all of them), attached so much importance to counter the 'Kufr' of Qadianis that it was considered necessary to estab- lish an organization, on an international level, namely Aalami Majlis-e-Tahaffuz-e-Khatme Nubuwwat? ANSWER: Before I answer, I sum up the question which in short is: What distinguishes a Qadiani from other Non-Muslims? First I lay before you an example: You know that alchol is prohibited in Shari'at. Drinking alchol, manufacturing and selling it are all prohibited, i.e., 'Ha ram.' Similarly, you know that a Pig is filthy and impure. Selling its meat which is called pork and its eating, giving or conveying are absolute prohibitions, i.e., 'Harame Mutlaq.' Everyone is aware of these precepts. Now imagine a situation: A man sells alchol and calls it alchol. Another man also sells alchol but pastes a label of 'Zam-Zam' on the bottle, i.e., he is selling alchol under the name of 'Zam-Zam'. Both persons are criminals but who is a greater criminal? You know the answer. Take another example: There is a butcher who is selling pork. He sells it as such. Clearly he says this is pork. Whosoever wants to buy may buy it. Certainly he is a criminal in Shariat for selling pork. Against this is a person who, sells pork but calls it mutton. Now both those persons have committed a crime in Islamic Law; but sky-high is the difference in the nature of the offence between the two. One sells 'Unlawful,' i.e., 'Haram' calling it 'Unlawful,' Haram. The other sells 'Unlawful' Haram, calling it 'Lawful', i.e. 'Halal.' Anybody, unawares, could fall into his trap and eat 'Unlawful-Haram' pork thinking it to be 'Lawful-Halal' mutton. Thus the difference between a butcher selling pork as mutton and a butcher selling pork as pork is precisely the difference between a Qadiani and other Non-Muslim such as Jew, Christian and Hindu, etc. 'Kufr' is 'Kufr' in both cases because it is negation of Islam. But 'Kafirs' of the world do not put label of Islam on their 'Kufr' and do not propagate their 'Kufr' as Islam. A Qadiani, on the other hand, puts a label of Islam on his 'Kufr' and deceives Muslims by saying this is Islam. CATEGORIES OF 'KAFIRS' So far I have spoken to you in general terms. I shall explain the theology. 'Kufr' is of several kinds but three are very obvious: First: The 'Kafir' who is undoubtedly a 'Kafir. Second: That 'Kafir' who is 'Kafir' from inside but pretends as Muslim from outside. Third: That 'Kafir',who tries to label his 'Kufr' as Islam Category No. 1: Jews, Christians, Hindus, etc., are unmistakenly and undoubtely Kaffirs. The Polytheist (mushrikeen) of pre-Islamic Mecca were openly included in this category. All of them are openly Kaffirs. Category No. 2: In the second category are Hypocrites (munafiqueen) who recite the Kalimah with the tongue but hide Kufr in their hearts. In their case Allah, the Exalted, has proclaimed: When they (hypocrites) come to thee, they say: "We believe": but in fact they enter with a mind against Faith, and they go out with the same but Allah knoweth fully all that they hide. (HQ 5.61) Hazrat Imam Shafai, (Allah's mercy on him) used to say about Ibrahim bin Ulayya: "I am his opponent, so much so, that I shall oppose him even if he recites the Kalimah Tayyiba" It means that some persons are so compulsive liars that they lie even in 'Kalimah Tayyiba' because their 'Kalimah' is a show of falsehood. Category No. 3: The 'Kufr' of the third category exceeds the 'Kufr' of the second category because their offence is that they call their 'Kufr' as Islam. They present pure 'Kufr' in the nomenclature of Islam by twisting the verses of the holy Quran, the sacred 'Ahadith' of the Prophet , the statements of his Companions and sayings of revered saints in order to prove their 'Kufr' as Islam. Such men are called zindiq (Dualist-infidels) in Shari'at terminology. To sum up, the three categories are Unbelievers; Kafir); Hypocrites: (Munafiq); and Dualist- lnfidel: (Zindiq). 'Kafir' (Unbeliever) is a person who does not believe in Allah and the Prophet neither outwardly nor inwardly. 'Munafiq' (Hypo crit) is a person who hides 'Kufr' in his heart and his recitation of 'Kalimah' is false. He is a pretender. 'Zindiq' (Dualist-Infidel) is a person who gilt-edges, his 'Kufr' with the gold of Islam and tries to present it as real Islam. WHO IS AN APOSTATE An apostate (Murtad) is a person who abandons Islam. A precept should be understood here which is recorded in the books. All the four schools of 'Fiqah' unanimously agree that in case of an apostate (Murtad), Shari'at allows him three days to enable him to remove his doubts. All possible efforts should be made to clarify his doubts. If he understands and re-enters Islamic fold, well and good; otherwise he shouk~ be got rid off. This precept is known as 'killing of apostate' (Qatl-e-Murtad). None of the Imams differs on this issue. Laws of all civilised countries and governments award death punishment to rebels. As apostate is a rebel of Islam, therefore apostasy (Irtidad) is punishable with death. CONCESSION OF SHARI'AT FOR APOSTATE Islamic Shari'at offers a concession to its rebels while laws of the world do not do so. They must put their traitors to death even if they beg for mercy after their arrest and award of sentance. Take the example of a rebel of any modern government. He may repent, beg to be excused or vouch for good behaviour a hundred times, assuring the government that in future he will never resort to revolt; still he will not be heard. The capital sentence will be executed on him. His repentance will be unacceptable. At no cost will he be excused. But Islamic Shari'at Law gives a concession to its rebel. The Apostate (Murtad) is allowed three days to think over. He is advised to withdraw and renounce his apostatic stance. If he assures for future and is repentant, he is not punished. In spite of this humane concession afforded by Shari'at, Non-Muslims criticise the Islamic punishment. It is a matter of surprise that there are no objections to the hanging of a person when caught in conspiracy, say for toppling the lawful Govern- ments of the American President or the Russian President or the Pakistani President. Conspirators are sentenced to death and no law of any civlised court disagrees with this. Why do then people disapprove of punishing a person who rebels against Allah's Prophets and say: Do not put him to death! Islam does concede three days' grace to enable the apostate to remove his doubts and come back into the Islamic fold. If he begs for mercy or repents, Shari'at grants him his life back. But if he is adamant and refuses to renounce his apostasy then Allah's sacred soil must be cleaned of his foul existence. APOSTASY IS A DEADLY DISEASE OF MILLAT: WHY? It is so because it takes the form of a carbuncle which stinks. If a malignant growth (Allah forbid) appears on some part of human body, doctors advise its amputation. Who would call this a tyranny over the patient? Rather a favour to him! By this removal the sound parts of the body are saved from septic poisoning, else death would be certain. Therefore it is wise to cut away the diseased part to protect the healthy part. In the same way apostasy is a carbuncle of Islamic Mill at. The malignant part, i.e., the 'Murtad,' despite preaching does not retrace his steps. Therefore, cancerous malignancy must necessarily be removed otherwise his poison will gradually travel inside the entire physiology of the Islamic Millat. This indeed is the unanimous verdict of the four Imams, and theologians and doctors of Shari'at law. Wisdom and sagacity demands it. The safety of Millat lies in it. ORDER OF SHARIAT FOR DUALIST - INFIDEL: ZINDIQ A dualist-infidel is worse than an apostate, because he is bent upon presenting his 'Kufr' as Islam. Imam Shafai and Imam Ahmad, in their well-known sayings, were pleased to ordain that a dualist-infidel (Zindiq) is governed by the same orders as an apostate (Murtad); that is, afford him a chance first, give him time to repent and permit him to return to the Islamic fold. If within three days he does so, leave him unscathed, otherwise it is obligatory to award him capital sentence. VIEWS OF IMAM MALIK: Imam Malik, (Allah's blessing on him), goes one step forward to say: "I will not accept the penitence of a Dualist- Infidel". By this he means to say that if a person guises his 'Kufr' with Islam and does not repent, when caught in the act, then, (leaving it to Allah whether or not He accepts his penitence), we shall certainly promulgate Allah's Shari'at on him, i.e., shall pronounce capital punishment for him. This is a crime which is similar to adultery in which a person may be penitent (Taaib) for future but his penitence will not save him from death. Therefore, he will be punished under all circumstances. Similarly, hands are to be amputated for stealing. A thief, on arrest, may offer penitence ('Tauba') but his offence will not go unpunished. It is in this light that Imam Malik says: "I will not accept the penitence of a Dualist Infidel." Capital punishment will certainly be given to him, although he may be penitent ('Taaib') a hundred times. Similar sayings are on record from Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad bin Hambal, (Allah's blessing on them.) In books of 'Fiqah' such as 'Durr-e-Mukhtar' and 'Shami' and some others, it is written that if a Dualist-Infidel offers penitence ('Tauba') of his own free will, his penitence will be accepted without capital penalty, provided no one came to know of his offence. Similarly, he will be excused from punishment if he became penitent of his own free will, on Allah's guidance. Therefore, if a Qadiani renounces his 'Qadianism' on his own and offers penitence ('Tauba') then he will be excused. On the contrary, if he offers penitence ('Tauba') after arrest then there will be no excuse, irrespective of his repentance even a hundred times. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APOSTATE AND DUALIST - INFIDEL: Shari'at enjoins upon us to preach to the apostate. If he as a result of preaching, undertakes penitence ('Tauba'), he will save himself from capital punishment but this does not apply to a dualist-infidel. There is another saying from Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa, and one from Imam Ahmad, (Allah's blessings on them all), that penitence ('Tauba') of a dualist-infidel is not acceptable because he has committed the crime of dualist infidelity (Zindaqa), i.e., he applied false coating of Islam over his 'Kufr' I repeat, he has sold pork as mutton and wine as 'Zam-Zam.' This is a crime which is not excusable and is certainly punishable with capital sentence. QADIANIS' COVENANT OF 'KUFR' My purpose here is not to tell you why Qadianis are 'Kafirs.' What I do wish to tell you is that in spite of their being diehard 'Kafirs' they present their 'Kufr' with the label of 'Islam'. Take the case of our Kalimah Tayyiba. They do not believe in our 'Kalimah'. How can they claim to be Muslims? Please understand this clearly that a person who doubts in their being a 'Kafir' is not a Muslim. They pretend to be Muslims and say, "We are Musalman, we are only a sect of Islam called Jamat-e-Ahmadiya'.' But they are liars. They have established their colony near London and have named it "Islamabad" and behave as protagonists of Islam. When they come across a Muslim they deceive him and tell him "You see, we offer 'Namaz', keep fasts, do this and do that and we consider Hazrat Muhammad , as 'Khatam un Nabieen', i.e., the last of the Prophets." They play fraud on simple ignorant Muslims and assure them that every person who enters their 'Jamaat' has got to agree to one condition of their Charter of Loyalty which reads as follows: "I acknowledge Hazrat Muhammad as 'Khatam un Nabieen' with all sincerety of my heart. By this covenant they deceive poor simple Muslims. WHY QADIANS ARE DUALISIT - INFIDELS (ZINDIQ) They are so for the simple reason that they pour Islam into their mould of 'Kufr' and label urine as 'Zam-Zam' and dog's carrion as 'Halal'. The whole world knows that Allah's Prophet Mu- hammad was the last of the Prophets. This Islamic doctrine of finality of prophet hood is a definite certainty. On the occasion of his farewell Haj, the Prophet declared: "O peoplel I am the last prophet and you are the last Ummat." Besides, there are more than two hundred 'Ahadith' in which the Prophet , himself explained about the finality of Prophethood ('Khatm e Nubuwwat'). In different ways and through different expressions he was pleased to say that there will be no prophet after him and that nobody will be given prophethood after him.......... MEANING OF FINAL PROPHETHOOD It does not mean that any previous prophet is not alive. It simply means that if for the sake of argument all the previous prophets supposedly come in the world in the times of our Prophet Muhammad and become his servants, even then our Prophet (SW) shall continue to be the last prophet since nobody has been awarded prophethood after him. The list of the blessed prophets in the manifest of the All-Knowing Allah carried his exhalted name in the last. With his arrival, the list of the holy prophets became complete. MEANING OF 'LAST OF CHILDREN AND 'LAST OF PROPHETS' A child who is born last in a family is called their youngest off-spring. He is the final child and none is born after him. It does not mean that he is the last to survive among his brothers. Of course, it sometimes happens that he is born last but dies earlier. Then the father says: this child who died was my last one. In the same way, the last prophet ('Khatam un Nabieen') means no prophet after him; no person shall wear the crown of prophethood or sit on the throne of prophethood after Muhammad Those prophets who were sent down earlier are certainly within our Faith but our Prophet is the last one. None else will wear the prophetic mantle of honour after him; nor will the Ummat put faith in any such pretender. QADIANIS HAVE ALTERED MEANING OF 'KHATAM UN NABIEEN' Qadianis say that the epithet of 'Khatam un Nabieen' does not mean that our Prophet is the last of the Prophets, and that there shall be no prophet after him.In their opinion it means that our Prophet Muhammad will certify future prophets with his seal, i.e., on whomsoever he will stamp, that person shall become a prophet. What a nonsense ! Infourteen hundred years only one person, namely Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian has been stamped as prophet and he too a -eyed man! The seal has authenticated a one-eyed 'Dajjal' from Qadian! I repeat that the term 'Khatam un Nabieen means that our Prophet Muhammad is the last prophet. All new entries have been stopped. They have been sealed. No prophet will come after him. It is like an envelope which has been closed by sealing it. 'Khatam' means sealing. Therefore, the term 'Khatam un Nabieen' means that the list of the prophets is completed and the seal has been placed on it. Neither a fresh entry is possible nor will there be any removal from that list. But the Qadianis have changed the meaning of 'Khatam un Nabieen' to mean that our Prophet grants certificates of prophethood to persons. In other words, Allah, who was previously sending down prophets, has now transferred this department to Prophet Muhammad for stamp- ing people and making them prophets!! This is called infidelity ('Zindaqa'). In this way, they pronounce the name of Islam for meeting their nefarious designs and twist the meaning of verses of the holy Quran to suit their agnostic beliefs. That is why I say they sell pork and dog's carrion as 'Halal' meat and produce liquor under the holy label of 'Zam-Zam.' By Allah, I would not have cared one bit for them if they had plainly said: "We are not Muslims and Islam is not our religion. LOOK AT THE 'BAHAI' RELIGION This is also a religion of the world. The Bahais believe in Bahaullah of Iran as their prophet. This group still exists. We call them 'Kafir' and they have also declared that they have nothing to do with Islam. Well, there ends the matter. But these Qadianis call their 'Kufr' as Islam and in this way deceive Muslims. It is for this reason that they are dualist-infidels (Zindiq) and not simply Non- muslims. Remember! A Muslim can be at peace with a non-Muslim but never with a dualist-infidel ('zindiq') or apostate ('Murtad'). THREE QUESTIONS TO QADIANIS Who has allowed you to: 2) Cancel the Kalimah of Prophet Muhammad and adopt the Kalimah of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad? 3) Call the so-called 'Wahi' of Mirza Ghulan. Ahmad as the basis of salvation in place of the true 'Wahi' of Prophet Muhammad ? You impudently declare yourselves Muslims and call us 'Kafirs'. I quote from your Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani's Kalimatul Fasl, p.110: "Every person who believes in Moosa but does not believe in Isa or believes in Isa and does not believe in Muhammad or believes in Muhammad but does not believe in the promised Masih (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad), (such a person) is not only an Unbeliever ( a Kafir ) but a thorough Unbeliever ("Pakka Kafir') and an outcast from the Islamic fold". QADIANI KALIMAH The Qadianis claim that Prophet Muhammad was destined to come down into the world two times, first in Makkah and this prophethood lasted 1300 years, and secondly in Qadian, at the start of fourteenth Hijra in the incarnation of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Therefore in their opinion, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is the reincarnation of Muhammad ur Rasulullah and consequently the Qadianis think of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as Muhammad ur Rasulullah in their minds when reciting the Kalima-e-Tayyiba. This is veiled Kufr'. I quote again Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani from his Al Fasl, p.l58: "The promised Masih (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) iS Muhammad ur Rasulullah himself who was reincarnated in the world for propagation of Islam. erefore, we do not need a new Kalimah. Yes, if somebody else would have reborn instead of Muhammad ur Rasulullah then this need (to have a new Kalimah) would have arisen" From the above it is evident that for the Qadianis La ilaha ill Allah Muhammad ur Rasulullah' means 'La ilaha ill Allah Mirza Rasulullah' who (Muhammad ur Rasulullah) has been reincarnated in Qadian. (Allah protect us from this sacrilege) The Qadianis believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is Prophet Muhammad incarnate. Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani acknowledges that for the Qadianis Mirza himself is Muhammad ur Rasulullah and that they recite the Kalimah believing Mirza to be Muhammad ur Rasulullah. Therefore they do not need to construct a new Kalimah. However we say that Mirza was not Muhammad ur Rasulullah incarnate; rather Mirza was Devil incarnate! DO PEOPLE KNOW THAT The Qadianis fabricated: 1. a different Prophet 2. a different Quran (named "Tazkirah", which has the same status in the eyes of Qadianis as is accorded to Torah, Zabur, Injeel and Quran by the Muslims). 3. a different Kalimah 4. a different Shari'at 5. a different Ummat How with all these very basic differences the Qadianis have the cheek to tell the world that they are Muslims and that their religion is Islam! They are Dualist-Infidels indeed. Allah protect us from their calumny and cunning! NONSENSE I ask Qadianis: You call us 'Kafirs'. Why? What tenets of 'Deen' of Prophet Muhammad have we refused to accept? Just because of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's birth all the Muslims of the world have become 'Kafirs'! Before his birth, our 'Deen' was alright as Islam and we were Muslims. After his creation our 'Deen' has become 'Kufr' and we have become 'Kafirs' ! ! Allah protect us from the Qadianis' snare! Can there be any more nonsense to compare with? CRIMES OF MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD OF QADIAN He has committed these heinous crimes: a . Claimed Prophethood b. Started a new religion c. Called his followers Muslims d. Called followers of Muhammad as 'Kafirs'. Please tell me, if any Jew, Christian, Hindu, Sikh, etc., has ever committed this crime. Therefore I say that the Qadianis are 'Kafirs' of the highest magnitude and of the worst degree ever born. CONCESSIONAL TREATMENT OF QADIANIS BY MUSLIMS By Law of Shari'at, they should be awarded capital sentence because they are Dualist-infidels ('Zindiq'), calling Islam 'Kufr' and 'Kufr' Islam. If they are masquerading as Muslims on the face of the globe, it is because they have not been sentenced. Despite this concession, they proclaim that they are being tyrannized in Pakistan. Truly speaking, they are taking undue advantage of our politeness and the Pakistan Government is treating them most kindly which they do not deserve. The Government has not placed any restriction on the performance of their religious rites. They have been only told to stop calling the religion of Prophet Muhammad as 'Kufr' and to stop calling their Qadiani religion as Islam; no more restriction than this. Otherwise, remember! The Law of Shari'at ordains to award them capital sentence. But the government of Pakistan has given them a ccncession. The Qadianis occupy high posts and offices in Government administration and public services. In spite of these concessions, they appeal to the United Nations and to the Courts of Jews and Christians, clamouring that the Pakistan Go- vernment has snatched their rights. What were their rights which have been snatched? What wrong has been done to them? Only they have been told that Kalimah Tayyiba is the Kalimah of Islam. HOW CAN THE QADIANIS: a) be permitted to paste bottles of liquor with labels of 'Zam-Zam'? be allowed to sell pig's pork and dog's carrion as 'Halal' meat? c) be allowed to call our Islam as 'Kufr'? d) be a]lowed to present the religion of - eyed Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as Islam? DISGRACE The pronouncement of just Kalimah Tayyiba from the mouth of these hypocrites (i.e. the Qadianis) is: 1. A disgrace of our Kalimah 2. A disgrace of Allah's Prophet. 3. A disgrace of Deen-e-Islam. They cannot be allowed to go ahead with this disgrace and deceit. Allah has said about these hypocrites: "Allah testifies that the hypocrites are liars". These dualist-infidels ('Zindiq') like an apostate ('Murtad') must be awarded capital sentence. In the following paragraphs I record my reasons COMMANDS OF SHARI'AT FOR DESCENdANTS OF APOSTATES ('MURTADEEN') Shari'at allows three days' grace period for an Apostate (Murtad) to get back into the Islamic fold If he does not, he is to be awarded capital punishment. I present a case for your study. Consider for example some apostates who forsake Islam and who happen to be in so large numbers that, being a sizable group, they appear to be out of control for an Islamic Government to execute them. Let me be more precise. Take the example of an Islamic country where the Muslim population of a town decides to become, let's say, Christians, and having done so, manage somehow to save themselves from the Shari'at punishment. After a passage of time these Christians die their natural death leaving their children as Christians. The precept for them is to force these people back into the Islamic fold, by imprisoning them or by other appropriate means but not by capital punishment. In other words, if the original parent was an apostate, his son will also be an apostate. However, the grandson will not be an apostate; he will be a simple 'Kafir' and shall not be liable to punishment for apostasy. COMMANDS OF SHARI'AT FOR DESCENDANTS OF DUAI~ISI INFIDELS ('ZINDIQ') The breed of Qadianis will never change. They may multiply up to ninety-nine generations, still the hundredth one will continue to be Dualist- infldel and Apostate. The reason is that their crime is a never-ending one. So long as they call their Kufr as Islam their infidel dualism shall see no end. This offence shall be ongoing in their progenecy. For anybody unaware of the facts, let it be clear to him that every Qadiani, whether he is so by conversion, or by birth, or by heritage, is a dualist- infidel under the Shari'at Law because his crime flows unending throughout his lineage. TEN LEGITIMATE SONS AND ONE 'NON-DESCRIPT' Something more I want to tell you for which I shall draw an example which, I am afraid, is crude but it suits here. A father had ten sons. All his life he treated them as his sons. After his death a fellow gets up to claim that he is the sole legitimate son and the ten are illegitimate. Two questions arise here: Firstly: Will any sane person accept the claim of this fellow who is born of a non-descript origin and who never laid his claim while the father was alive? Conversely, never did the deceased father say to anybody that he had a son of that description. Can any Court of Justice in the whole world adjudicate in favour of that fellow and declare the ten legitimate sons as illegitimate ? No. Never! Secondly: Wh,at will be the reaction of the ten legitimate sons against the non-descript who calls them sons of adultery? Keeping the answers of the two questions in mind, now listen: We belong to the Ummat of Prophet Muhammad .We fully believe in the Deen which he brought forth. We are his spiritual children. If I say so, it is no idea of mine but it is in the holy Quran which speaks in these terms: The Prophet is more related to Momins than their self is to them. (Quran: Ahzab 33:6) That is to say, no member of the Ummat of Prophet Muhammad has a stronger relation with his self than what Prophet Muhammad has with each member of his Ummat. And the holy Quran further declares: 'And his wives are their mothers' (HQ 33.6). It is therefore evident that all the revered wives of the Holy Prophets are our mothers and we call each of them 'Ummul Momineen' (Mother of Muslims); for example, Ummul Momineen Hazrat Aiysha Siddiqa; Ummul Momineen Hazrat Khadijat ul Kubra; Ummul Momineen Hazrat Maimoona; Ummul Momineen Hazrat Umme Salma, and so on (may Allah be pleased with them). When they arse our mothers, surely Hazrat Muhammad is our spiritual father. But children in a family are seldom identical. Some are more obedient, some are less helpful, some are more virtuous, some are less dutiful, some are more wise and some are less clever, but they are all members of one family despite their differing personality and varying individuality. Still they are known as children of the same parents. Muslims have ever been the spiritual children of Allah's Prophet Muhammad for thirteen centuries, till, at the start of the fourteenth century, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad popped up from Qadian and claimed solely for himself the spiritual sonship of Allah's Prophet Muhammad and excluded all others. Mirza did not stop at that, he dubbed the Muslims as "Kafirs." The whole Ummat of Islam has been abused by him as "illegitimate" keeping legitimacy only for himself. On this basis Mirza Ghulam Ahmad calls all the Muslims as "haramzadey" (bastard). Allah protect us from his slander and abuse. Excuse me for quoting the words of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad but I had to. RAVING CLAIM I ask the civilised courts of the world to dismiss Ghulam Ahmad's raving claim of spiritual sonship as a stupid claim of that sinful vagrant of non-descript lineage who claims legitimacy to the exclusion of ten real sons and who attempts to severe the connection of the whole Ummat from their Prophet in spite of the Ummat's complete submission to his 'Deen' from A to Z. Have we made any alteration in the doctrines of Islamic faith or is it Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani who has sinfully done so? DIALOGUE WITH A QADLANI I happened to talk to a Qadiani once. I told him: "We have been Muslims for thirteen centuries all along. Suddenly, in the fourteenth century your Mirza Ghulam Ahmad appeared and made impossible claims. Thus the discord ensued. Listen and be just. Here is an offer to you: if our present beliefs are according to Islamic beliefs of the past th.rteen centuries, accept us and leave Ghulam Ahmad; and if your present beliefs are according to the Islamic beliefs of the past thirteen centuries we shall accept you. Thus the discord will come to a permanent close. Now, answer me because pros and cons are equal for both of us." That Qadiani was a Punjabi of Sialkot city. He replied in the Punjabi dialect: (Translation) "The truth is that for us everybody is a liar except Mirza Sahib. "( ! ) Now you must have understood that the Qadianis are a people who consider as liars the Companions ('Sahabah of the Prophet the 'Tabeyeen' (contemporaries of Sahabah) 'Aimma Mujtahideen' (authorities on religious matters and jurists), and 'Mujaddideen' (thelogical reformers) and the entire Ummat spread over fourteen hundred years (God forbid) "All liars, except Mirza! On this premise can the Qadianis claim even an iota of relationship with Islam and Muslims? No. Never. CHALLENGE TO MUSLIMS Brothers and sisters, I am sure you have now understood that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, the cheat, is deceiving the entire world by calling himself a spiritual child of the holy Prophet I turn to Muslims and ask them: Don't you have any grace left in you to answer these shameless Qauianis? They come to you at social level, attend your meetings in public and private and repeat their nonsense. On your part, you are a quiet listener to the descendants of a non-descript masquerader. Alas, our simple Muslim brethren! Now what are the obligations - yours, mine and that of every Muslim? What does our honour demand? It demands at least to have faith in the truth of Islamic Shari'at's decree on this issue, viz., capital punishment for an apostate and dualist-infidel. But it is up to the Government to respond to the Shari'at's call. However, this much is within our reach that we cut off all social connections with them and don't let them enter our gatherings and face them boldly everywhere. LIAR IN MOTHER'S LAP Corner the liar in his mother's lair. He has already been led away into his mother's haunt; praise be to Allah. The country of Britain is their mother. She gave birth to them. It is for this reason that Mirza Tahir Ahmad, the Qadiani Arch-priest, has run away from Pakistan to sit snug in the lap of his mother and chew the cud in British manger. From there he is barking at the Muslims of the world. Many simple-natured Muslims of Africa, America and Europe do not know what is Qadianism. They are on the 'hit-list' of these Qadianis. They have decided to mislead these Muslims as well as non-Muslims and are doing so. For this purpose, tons of money have been budgeted to beguile the Muslims and others and trap them into the snare of Qadiani apostasy and infidelity. But by Allah's grace and support of Aalami Majlise Tahafuzze Khatme Nubuwwat we have taken up the gauntlet under the banner of Hazrat Khatamun Nabieen Muhammad . The Qadiani camouflage and coat will soon be peeled off from every nook and corner of the world, just as it has been accomplished in Pakistan. TRAITORS That day is not far away when the world will get to know of the truth: that the Qadianis are not Muslims, that they are traitors of Islam, traitors of Muhammad and traitors of huma nity. Anti-Qadiani movement is now surging the whole world, sweeping the Qadianis out. Final victory shall be that of our Prophet Mu- hammad and his bondsmen. BONDSMEN OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD IN PAKISTAN For some time in Pakistan too, people considered the Qadianis as Muslims till the sacrifices, which were offered by the humble adherents of Muhammad ended in success, amputating the growth of Qadiani cancer from the Ummat's body. Allah willing, this shall happen in other countries of the world also because 'Aalami Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat' has launched its operations on an international scale. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mannerism of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani! (In light of his own Writings) Mirza Ghulam Qadiani did not have any scruples at using profanities to try to ridicule, intimidate, or threaten people who did not accept his false claim to prophethood. Here are a few examples of his writings: "My enemies are dirty swine and their women are more wretched than bitches." (Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 14, P. 53; Najmul Huda, P. 10, 53) "All Muslims regard my books with reverence and care and benefit from their sublime thoughts except those who are the offspring of prostitutes (bastards); God has put a seal upon their hearts and they do not accept me." (Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 5, Page 547-548; Mirat-o-Kamalat-i-Islam, P. 547; Aeena-e-Kamalat Islam, P.547-548) [Mirza Ghulam translated this Arabic word as "Bastard" in Roohany Khazaen Vol. 11, P. 282) "The one who has no belief in our ultimate victory is fond of becoming bastard and he is bound to be product of fornication." (Roohany Kazaen, Vol. 9, P. 31; Anwar ul Islam, P. 30) "Are they prepared to swear? No, they'll never do so because they are liars and are derooting the corpse of falsehood like dogs." (Supplement to Anjam-e-Atham, P. 25; Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 309) His eulogy about Maulvi Saadullah Ludhianwi was: "I look a sinful man among debauched who is more scoundrel and an execrated being like Satan... He who is called Saadullah by the ignorant is slanderer, wicked and a falsifier... You injured me, bastard. I won't be truthful if you won't have a disgraceful death." (Haqiqat-ul Wahi, P. 14-15; Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 22, P. 734-735) "If Abdullah Athum is saved from death (as per Mirza's prophecy) and if all the world say the Christian was correct, then the bastard will not follow the right path." (Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 32) "Abdul Haq is not content with our victories. He is itching to become a bastard." (Anwar-ul-Islam, P. 30) "There is nothing more foul than a pig in the world. But the ulema who oppose me are more foul than pigs." (Anjam-i-Atham, P. 21) "You have inflicted pain on me with your foulness. You are not truthful. I pray that you die in shame, you son of a harlot." (Anjam-i-Atham, P. 288) "This bastard of a doctor does not thread the straight path." (Anwar-ul-Islam, P. 30) He called Shaikhul Islam Saanaullah of Amristar: "O, the son of wind, o traitor..." (Ijaz-i-Ahmadi, P. 43/77) The puzzling thing is that he himself wrote: "I have never abused anyone." (Moahiburahman, P. 18) "He is worst who is abusive, his heart is as filthy as Latrine." (Sar-e-Sumain, P. 74) "Abuses and rebukes are not the acts of a believer and a believer can not be a curser." (Azalat-ul-Auham, P. 66) Is this how a Prophet or even a rightly guided individual would speak? COULD HE BE A PROPHET???

MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD IN THE MIRROR OF HIS OWN WRITINGS PREFACE Truth and untruth are two on-going serials of the world. But Allah, Exalted in Munificence, has bestowed some distinctive factors enabling a man of ordinary understanding and common sense to identify one from the other. Praise to Him. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (India) made a number of claims for himself, from being a 'Revivalist' to being a 'Prophet'. The falsehood or otherwise of a claim is easily identifiable through several tokens of cognisance which Allah, the Exalted, has laid down. But the easiest pointer, readily available, is Mirza's own writings about which he himself said that his writings were a touchstone to check upon the veracity of his claims. I, therefore, invite readers to go through his written statements and judge for themselves. Here are presented 22 excerpts from Mirza's writings. You would see in these that Mirza challenges the world to prove him a liar. He is bold about it. I expect my brethren to test his metal in a cool unprejudiced manner. I pray to Allah, the Exalted, to grant us His Favour in identifying truth as truth and untruth as untruth. Aameen! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani wrote in a letter to Qazi Nazar Hussain, Editor, Newspaper 'Qul-Qul' Bijnor, (India): "Those persons who come from Allah's side.... they do achieve essential intent of their 'sending down and do not die till the purpose of their commission is not manifested". "My mission for which I am standing in this field is this very one that 1 (a) topple the pillar of worship of Isa, ( spread monotheistic doctrine in place of Trinity, © and display dignity and glory o the holy Prophet before the world". "Therefore I am a liar if I fail in the manifestation of this essential intent, notwithstanding millions of tokens coming forth from me . "Why is the world, therefore, enmical to me? And why does it not see my end? If I manage to succeed in doing in support of Islam that work which the promised Masih or the promised Mahdi should have done, then I am truthful. And if nothing happens by the time I am dead then let everybody be witness that I am a liar. (Newspaper, 'Badr,' Qadian, Volume 2, page 4, July 19,1906). COMMENTS How far did Mirza succeed in his mission is recounted in the official newspaper of Qadianis, Al Fazl,' in its issue dated June 19,1941, on page 5. It says: "Do you know, there are 137 Christian Missions operating in India, i.e., Head Missions. Number of their branches is many more. More than 1800 'Priests' are working in the head missions. There are 403 hospitals in which 500 doctors are working There are 43 printing presses and about 100 newspapers are printed in different languages. They are running 51 Colleges, 617 High Schools and 61 Training Colleges where 60,000 students study. In the (Christian) 'Salvation Army' there are 308 European and 2886 Indian priests. Under it (the 'Army') there are 507 Primary Schools in which 18,675 students study Eighteen colonies and 11 Dailies are their own. Under different departments of this Army 3,290 men are nourished. Result of these efforts and sacrifices is that it is said that 224 persons of different religions are being daily converted to Christianity. Against this, what are the Musalmans doing? Perhaps they do not consider this work worth their attention. Ahmadi Jamaat should think what is the position of their own efforts against such widespread net of Christian missionaries. We have only two dozen preachers in the whole of India and the difficult conditions under which they are working, we know that too". This is the evidence produced by a Qadiani newspaper, 33 years after Mirza's death! It shows that Mirza s claim did no damage to Christianity Monotheism did not flourish at the cost of Trinity. His effort to stop the spread of Christianity failed. Thus Mirza's statement: "Therefore I am a liar if I fail in the manifestation of this essential intent..... And if nothing happens by the time I am dead then let everybody be witness that I am a liar" is a lie self-proved. (2) Mirza writes in Zamima Anjam-e-Atham: (Pages 30-35). "If within seven years, a distinct effect of my efforts does not appear by Allah's support in service of Islam and, since death of false religions is essential on the hands of Masih, if this death of false religions does not come by through me, i.e., if Allah, the Exalted, does not reveal those tokens through my hands which shall enhance Islam's success, as a result of which Islam starts to enter from all sides annihilating the void Christian Divinity and the world catching on a different hue, then, I swear by Allah that I shall consider myself a liar". COMMENTS Mirza wrote the above in January, 1897, or thereabout. In other words his promised seven years' limit closed in 1903. By that year Mirza had to fulfil his promise to substantiate his truthfulness, failing which he had sworn himself to be a liar. Now, readers know that nothing of that sort happened and his promise did not materialise according to the time-scale which he himself had stipulated. Thus Mirza is a self-proclaimed liar. (3) It so happened during Ramadhan-ul-Mubarak in the year 1311 Hijri that lunar eclipse occurred on the 13th and solar eclipse on the 28th. Both eclipses chanced to fall during the same month. Mirza announced this phenomena as a proof of his 'Mahdviat'. He declared that this supernatural abnormality was a special sign for his sake only and which had never occurred before during lifetime of any other claimant to Mahdviat, Masihiat or Prophethood. In Magazine, 'Anwar-ul-Islam' (p. 47) Mirza wrote: "Since the times that this world was created never did lunar and solar eclipses get together during the times of any claimant of Prophethood/ Messengership/ Muhaddathiat. If somebody says they have conjoined then burden of proof lies on him". "It never happened and certainly never happened from the start of the world till today that lunar and solar eclipses conjoined in this manner in Ramadhan and that some claimant to Prophethood, Messengership or Muhaddathiat was present at that time." (Page 40.) COMMENTS Mirza's lack of knowledge deserves pity. From the years Hijri 18 to Hijri 1312, lunar and solar eclipses have conjoined sixty times in Ramadhan alone; during these thirteen centuries there have been not one but dozens of claimants of Prophethood and Mahdviat. But Allah, the Exalted, willed that Mirza be proved a liar from his own ignorance. Therefore Allah, the lExalted, made him write out this challenge: "If these cruel Maulvis can produce an evidence of this type of conjunction of eclipses in the times of any claimant, they should come out with it. Undoubtedly, I shall go down as a liar, by this". (Appendix, 'Anjam-e-Atham,' page 48). Here I produce evidence, not one but four. 1) In Hijri 117, lunar and solar eclipses conjoined in month of Ramadhan in the times of a claimant, by name "Treef' who was living in Aljazair. 2) Again, Hijri 127 saw a conjunction of the eclipses and at that time a person called Saleh, son of Treef, was claimant of prophethood. 3) A conjunction again occurred in 1267 Hijri in Iran where Mirza Ali Muhammad Bab was blowing his trumpet of Mahdviat for seven years. 4) The Hijri of 1311 was again the year of conjunction when Mahdi Sudani was spreading his cult of Mahdviat in Sudan. More historical proofs are available in respect of such phenomenal conjunctions in the lifetime of many claimants of prophethood and Mahdviat. For details refer to the following books: 1) 'Doosri Shadadat-e-Aasmani' by Maulana Abu Ahmad. 2) 'Aimma-e-Talbis' & Raees-e-Qadian ' by Maulana Abul Qasim Dilawari. But the above four evidences are sufficient to prove Mirzas lies. (4) Mirza wrote in 'Izala-e-Auham ': (p. 190, 1st edition; p. 79, 5th edition.) "O Brethren of Deen and theologians of inviolable Law! Listen, you people to my submissions intently; that the claim of the promised similar, which this humble has made, has been taken as the promised Masih by unwitted folks.... I have not certainly made this claim that I am Masih, son of Mariam. The person putting this blame on me is a downright slanderer and a liar". COMMENTS The above clarifies the position. Mirza admits he was NOT the promised Masih and he confirms that those who consider him so, are 'unwitted folks, downright slanderers and liars'. (5) Mirza wrote in Tuhfatun Nadwah: (Page 5). (1) "If I don't have knowledge of hidden things, then I am a liar; (2) "If death of Ibn-e-Mariam is not testified by Quran, then I am a liar; (3) "If Hadith-Mairaj did not make Ibn-e-Mariam sit among the dead souls, then I am a liar; (4) "If Quran did not declare in Sura 'Noor' that caliphs of this Ummat shall be from this very Ummat, then I am a liar; (5) "If Quran did not give me the name of Ibn-e- Mariam, then I am a liar". COMMENTS Each and every claim above is wrong. Lies stand proved. (6) Mirza wrote in Tuhfatun Nadwah (Page 4): "Allah, the Exalted, in His Holy Book says:.. ....That is, if this (person) will be telling lies he will be destroyed while you will be seeing him. His falsehood shall kill him. But if he is truthful then some of you shall become a target of his predictions and will depart from this mortal place while he will be seeing them. Now, test me on this basis which is in God's words and evaluate my claims". COMMENTS We are ready to evaluate Mirza's claim on the basis set by him and draw these conclusions: l) Mirza engaged himself against Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi in an imprecation of Mubahala. Right in front of his adversary's eyes Mirza met his doom. His falsehood killed him. 2) During a tete-a-tete with another opponent, by name Maulana Sanaullah, Mirza indulging in curses, implored Allah to take away first the life of whosoever was a liar. And lo! Mirza died first while Maulana Sanaullah lived on to see him dead 3) Mirza's rival-in-love was Sultan Muhammad Sahib. In burning jealously Mirza died of Cholera while Sultan Muhammad lived on after Mirzas death. 4) Another opponent was Doctor Abdul Hakeem Khan. Mirza told him of the drawn sword of the Angel of Death hovering over his head and cursed him: "O my Provider! decide between the Liar and theTruthful !" 'Liar and the Truthful!' And lo! Mirza died before Doctor Sahib's very eyes as a veritable liar! The evidences of these four eye-witnesses amply testify Mirza's falsehood in accordance with the standards which he himself set forth. (7) On July 10, 1888, Mirza came forward to notify his "revelational foretelling", as follows: "That Absolute Omnipotent has told me:" "Start negotiations for the elder daughter (Mu- hammadi Begum) of that person (Ahmad Baig). In case of declination from Nikah, the end of that girl will be extremely bad and if she will be married to another person he, within two and a half years from and similarly father of that daughter within three years, will die". "Then in those days. attention was applied again and again for further clarification and details. It came to be known that God Almighty determined that He will bring the elder daughter (Muhammadi Begum) of that person (i.e. Ahmad Baig) into Nikah of this humble self after removal of each hindrance". "Be it clear to the evil-minded that in order to judge our truthfulness or falsehood there can be no greater touchstone of test than our predictions". (Majmua'i-e-Ishtharat Vol. I, pp. 157-159). COMMENTS This touchstone, which Mirza settled for himself to ascertain his truthfulness, has come very handy. On April 7, 1892, Ahmad Baig married his daughter, Muhammadi Begum, to one of his relatives namely Sultan Muhammad, resident of village Patti District Lahore. Now, in accordance with Mirza's divine revelation: (1) Muhammadi Begum ought to have been widowed by Oct. 6, 1894, but Allah, the Exalted, kept her safe from Mirza's evil eye and the couple lived happily together for no less than 57 years, i.e., 16 years in the lifetime of Mirza and 41 years after his death. From 1949 till 1966, Muhammadi Begum lived as a widow. In this way, she escaped the clutches of Mirza's 'divine revelation', 41 years earlier. (2) Sultan Muhammad should have died six months earlier than his father-in-law but by Allah's grace he lived for 57 years after him. (3) Ahmad Baig should have died after the death of his son-in-law and ought to have witnessed his daughter's widowhood and destitution but he departed earlier from the world, leaving his daughter and son-in-law happy in their life. (4) Each and every hindrance for Nikah between Mirza and the lady was destined to be removed by God, as per Mirza's 'repeated attentions to the Absolute Omnipotent' for bringing her into Nikah of that 'humble self. YET sorry! The Absolute Omnipotent did not help Mirza one bit, although he pursued the matter relentlessly. Poor Mirza failed miserably. The 'angel of death' wielded 'sword' over Mirza and he expired on May 26, 1908. Alas! he departed, burying pangs of love in his heart into his grave, coupled with heart-burnings of jilt. (5) According to Mirza's own words those who do not put his predictions on the touchstone of test for falsehood are 'the evil-minded'. (8) On the occasion of Nikah announcement of Muhammadi Begum, on July 10, 1888, Mirza prefaced the following two-verse piece on top of his communication: Allah's Divine Power will strangely showitself up; When the end result of my predictions will be visible. Distinction between truth and falsehood is to appear; Someone will get honour and some, disgrace. (Majmua-e-Ishtiharat, Vol. 1, p. 153). COMMENTS Result of predictions was seen on 26th May, 1908, in Mirza's death. Allah's Divine Power showed itself up on that day. Despite his twenty years' continuous efforts along with his 'revelation' hoaxes, Mirza was deprived of Muhammadi Begum. In this way, truth and falsehood became distinct in the wake of which the lady was honoured and Mirza disgraced. Who was a liar? (9) Mirza made several predictions in the case of Muhammadi Begum. Her parents, ignoring all these predictions, settled her Nikah elsewhere. Mirza was consumed with lover's cast-off jealousy. Not controlling himself, he blurted forth a letter to her paternal uncle, Mirza Ali Sher Baig, who was Mirza's brother-in-law as well. He wrote: "Now, I have heard that the girl's Nikah is going to be solemnised on the 2nd or the 3rd Eid ..... Participants in this Nikah are my great enemies. Nay, they are great enemies of Islam. They want Christians to laugh at us and Hindus to make merry but they don't care a bit for the Deen of Allah and the Prophet". "From their side, they are strongly determined to disgrace me and blacken my face. They are about to strike me with a sword. Now, to save me is the work of Allah, the Exalted. If I am His, He will surely save me. They want me to be dishonoured and to have my face blackened. God is Absolute. He may blacken the face of whomsoever He likes but, now, they want to push me into fire". COMMENTS Ah! The restlessness of Mirza for Muhammadi Begum and the coldness of her relatives. Woe betide! Enemies of Allah, enemies of the Prophet, enemies of Deen and enemies of Mirza are cutting into Mirza's core with the dagger of Nikah and turning him into a laughing stock of insult for the world. Alas Mirza! Aglow with lover's fire! Allah's help, none! Mirza bemoans in writhing agony: "If I am His, He will surely save me". Yes if he were His; otherwise, No. A straw from Allah for Mirza! (10) When Sultan Muhammad, Mirza's rival for Muhammadi Begum's hand, did not die within the period fixed by Mirza, he extended the duration of Sultam life: "Well, if not in two and a half years, certainly in my lifetime he will die. I declare that his living or not living is the test of my truthfulness or otherwise". He wrote in Persian: (Translation) "But I have not told you that this matter has come to a close at this state and that the end result is what has appeared or that the fact of prediction has finished at that. The real premise stands on its own. Nobody, by any of his tricks, can evade it. This is fated from Great Allah as inentable destiny (i.e. the predicted death of Sultan Muhammuld whereby Mirza could consummate his longing for Sultan's wife) and shortly the time of its oocurrence will come. I swear by that Allah Who raised Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa for us to make him His best creation that this prediction is true and will soon be visible. I make it a proposition for testing my truthfulness or my falsehood. And I have not said it on my own but that my Provider Himself has informed me of it". (Anjam-e-Atham, p.223). Mirza declared Sultan Muhammad's imminent death as a proposition to test his truthfulness or falsehood, i.e., if Sultan Muhammad died in Mirza's lifetime then Mirza was true otherwise he was a liar. What a pity that Mirza was a liar because he died in 1908 and Sultan Muhammad died in 1949. (11) Mirza wrote in case of Sultan Muhammad: "Remember, if the second part of this prediction does not come true (i.e., son-in-law of Ahmad Baig does not die in Mirza's lifetime) then I shall be more wicked than every wicked man. O idiots! this is not a human's pretension. This is no business of any depraved impostor. Consider this definitely to be God's true promise, the same God Almighty Whose words never evade; the same Glorious Provider Whose intentions nobody can stop!" (Append ix, 'Anjam-e-Atham' p54) COMMENTS Because Sultan Muhammad did not die in Mirza's lifetime, the undermentioned conclusions are drawn: 1) Mirza admits himself to be 'more wicked than every wicked man'. 2) His prediction was 'Pretension'. 3) His prediction was 'Business of any depraved impostor'. 4) If his claim was 'God's true promise' it could not possibly 'evade' because who 'can stop intentions of the 'Glorious Provider'? 5) A person who does not understand this simple thing, Mirza gives him the title of 'idiot'. (12) "I say again and again that quintessence of my prediction in case of the son-in-law of Ahmad Baig shall be his inevitable destiny. Wait for it. If I am a liar then this prediction will not be fulfilled and my death will come and if I am truthful then God Almighty will certainly fulfil it' . (Marginal note p-31, Anjam-e-Atham) COMMENTS How shameful! Ahmad Baig's son-in-law did not die during Mirza's lifetime. Thus Mirza had said correctly: "If I am a liar then this prediction will not be fulfilled, and my death will come.' (13) Mirza, in support of his 'heavenly' Nikah, had reasoned out from a Prophetic Hadith, (as written by him in 'Anjam-e-Atham ,' p-53 Annex): "For corroboration of this prediction, the holy Prophet of Allah has also previously predicted: the promised Masih will take a wife and have children. Now it is obvious that this mention of marriage and children normally bears no signi- ficance because every one generally marries and has children. There is no excellence in it. But here marriage means special marnage as a token and by children is meant special children for which the prediction of this humble self is there. It looks as if the Prophet of Allah is answering here the doubts of those black-hearted unbelievers that these sayings will certainly be fulfilled". COMMENTS Allah, the Exalted, kept Mirza deprived-of that 'special marriage' and from those 'special children', proving that Mirza's claim of'Promised Masihship was false and that the prophetic prediction did not fit upon him. The holy sajing was with regard to Hazrat Isa (peace be on him) that he would marry and would have children on his second appearance on earth Mirza has himself written about those persons who disbelieve his appearance: ~The Prophet of Allah is answering here the doubts of those black-hearted unbelievers that these sayings will certainly be fulfilled. (14) For fifteen days, Mirza carried on arguments with a Christian Priest, named Abdulla Aatham. Having failed to give him a defeat he announced his revelation on 5th June 1893 that within fifteen months his adversary would be thrown into ~haaviya' (the hell) unless he returned to the truth. Mirza wrote in this case: "I admit right this time that if this prediction goes false, that is, if within fifteen months from this date, the party who is on falsehood in view of Allah, does not fall into 'Haaviya' as death punishment then I am prepared to undergo every type of punishment: disgrace me, blacken my face, collar a rope around my neck or hang me on the gallows. I am ready for all. I swear by the Greatness of Allah's Glory that He will certainly do the same, will certainly do the same, will certainly do the same. Earth and sky my deviate but not His Ordainment. If-I am a liar, keep the gallows ready for me and consider me the most accursed of- all the accursed persons, evil-doers and Satans". (Jung-e-Muqaddas, p-189) COMMENTS Mirza's prediction expired on 5th September, 1894 but Atham neither renounced Christianity nor accepted Islam nor he fell into "Haaviya" in death punishment. Nothing of the sort happened and everything sailed smooth. Mirza went to the extent of invoking charms over Atham, throwing over him spells and witchcraft (ret: 'Seerat-ul-A~ahdi' p-188, Vol. 1) but nothing happened. On the last day, when this prediction was ending, i.e., 5th September he implored Allah, cried out and lamented: Ya Allah! Atham may die, Atham may die, Ya Allah! Atham may die" (ret. Newspaper Al- Fazl, dated 20th July 1940). But Atham lived on. Magic, charms, witchcraft and spells did him no damage. Allah rejected Mirza's implorations, lamentations and curses. Atham grew all the more prosperous! On the other hand, Mirza had proposed his own punishment as a liar: "Disgrace me, blacken my face, collar a rope around my neck or hang me on the gallows.. keep the gallows ready for me, think of me as the most accursed of all the accursed persons, evil-doers and Satans". Consequently, how did the opposing party carry out this instruction of Mirza Saheb? It can be guessed by the dirty announcements which were published on the expiry of the fixed time. What his adversaries did? They heaped on Mirza such filthy abusive epithets that it shall be indecent to print them here. But a couplet, which became popular on public tongues may be reproduced here: (Translations) Shameless perverse are also in this world, But you. shame-proof, have surpassed all! This was an echo to Mirza's own acknowledgment: "Most accursed of all the accursed, evil doers and Satans.' Really he was so, otherwise how Allah would have failed him before a 'Kafir' Christian? (15) Mirza wrote in Shahadat-ul-Quran: (p-80). "In addition to this, there are similar other magnificent tokens of this humble self on the test list: There is my prediction in respect of Munshi Abdulla Atham Sahib Amritsari, the term of which is fifteen months beginning from 5th June, (1893). My other prediction is in respect of the son-in-law of Mirza Ahmad Baig, resident of Patti, District Lahore, term of which has eleven months more from today the 21st September, 1893. All these matters which are totally beyond human power are sufficient to identify the true from the liar". COMMENTS This is exactly the modus-operandi in which a liar is distinguishable from a truthful person, that is, if these predictions are fulfilled as per duration of their terms then the teller of the predictions will be considered truthful. As the predictions failed, therefore Mirza is identified as a proven liar. No other argument is necessary to prove Mirza's lies. (16) Mirza announced: "In the end, I beseech You, O God! Almighty All- Knowing, if these predictions are not from You that Atham will be caught in fatal tortures and Ahmad Baig's elder daughter coming ultimately into Nikah of this humble self then destroy me with disgrace and disappointment. Efface me, perish me with insults, make me permanent target of accursed imprecations, please my enemies, accept their prayers if, in Your estimate, I am a driven outcast, accursed charlatan and one-eyed anti-Christ impostor ('DaJjal') as my opponents have understood me, and if that Benevolence of Yours is not with me which was with...... " (so and so saints and prophets: here Mirza has named many saints and prophets). (Ishtihar dated Oct. 27, 1894, reproduced from Majmu'a Ishtiharat p-116,Vol. 2). COMMENTS Despite these heart-rending entreaties and self-accursements, Allah did keep Mirza deprived of Nikah with Muhammadi Begum until he breathed his last. From this it appears that Mirza, according to his own statements, was 'a driven outcast, accursed charlatan and one-eyed anti-Christ impostor ('Dajjal') as his opponents have understood him'. Alas! As a result of this self-cursing he perished in disgrace and disappointment, became a permanent target of accursed imprecations, his enemies became happy and their prayers were accepted by Allah. (17) Mirza in his communication to Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari wrote: "ln your paper, you build up this reputation for me that this person imputes falsely, is a liar and is one-eyed anti-Christ impostor ('Dajjal'). I have borne a lot of tortures from you but endured them patiently........ if I am really a liar, an impostor and a charlatan, as you lemember me in your paper then I will perish in your lifetime". (Advertisement, Moului Sanaullah Saheb se Aakhri Faislah, Ref Majmua-e-lshtiharat, Vol. 3, p. 578.) COMMENTS Mirza died on 26th May, 1908, in the lifetime of Maulana Mirza's words are proved: If I am really a liar, an impostor and a charlatan, as you remember me in your paper then I will perish in your lifetime. Mirza was a 'truthful' liar, therefore died earlier. (18) In the same advertisement addressed to Maulana Sanaullah Amritsan, Mirza wrote: If that punishment which is not in the hands of a human being but only in God's Hands, such as plague, cholera, etc., and similar fatal diseases and if the same do not descend upon you in my lifetime then I am not god-sent". COMMENTS Allah, the Exalted, kept Maulana safe from every amiction in Mirza's lifetime and fulfilled this proposal of Mirza:. "Then I am not God-sent." (19) Mirza implores Allah in the above-quoted Aakhri Faislah. "O God! If this claim of the 'promised Masih' is only a false imputation from the 'self in me and in Your eyes I am a mischievous liar, then O my dear Master! Humbly I implore in Your Audience to put me to death in Maulana Sanaullah's life-time. Aameen". COMMENTS This prayer of Mirza came to be accepted; Mirza died while Maulana Sanaullah lived on. Proved: Mirza was a mischievous liar in the eyes of Allah the Exalted. Further proved: Mirza's claim of being 'promised Masih' was false imputation of his 'self and that Maulana Sanaullah was righteous. Would that Mirza had implored Allah for his guidance instead of his death! Perhaps that would also have been accepted. (20) Mirza further wrote: "O my Omnipotent! O Who has sent me down! Holding the garment of Your Sanctity and Mercy only, I beg in Your audience to honour us with a true decision between Maulana Sanaullah and myself. And he who in Your eyes is really a mischievous liar, lift him from the world in the very lifetime of whosoever is truthful. O Master! do it this Way. Aameen". COMMENTS This request of Mirza was also accepted. Maulana Sanaullah was truthful hence Mirza, struck by cholera, was lifted from the world in Maulana Sanaullah's lifetime. Mirza got from Allah what he asked from his mouth. Proved: Mirza was a mischievous liar. (21) Mirza wrote in Zamima Anjam-e-Atham pp.20- 21. "Shaikh Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and other notable opponents may hold a Mubahala with me. After the Mubahala even if one person could save himself from my imprecations then I will admit I am a liar". COMMENTS Under this arrangement, Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi held a Mubahala with Mirza. Result was that Mirza died in the lifetime of Maulana Sahib. Thus Mirza's covenant is corroborated: "I am a liar". (22) Mirza's writings show that he was a patient of 'Hyster-malaise.' He said so in conversations also. Doctors confirmed it. Others also said about it. Proofs are given below: 1) "You behold! Hazrat had foretold about my illness also which has come to pass likewise: He had said that when Masih will descend from the sky he will be wearing two saffron-coloured sheets of cloth. Therefore, same way, I have two diseases, one in the upper part of the body, viz., Hysteromania, and the other, excessive urination, in the lower part". (Malfoozat-e-Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, Vol. 8, p. 445). 2) "My condition is such that, despite my constant involvement in two diseases, I remain preoccupied with work that I carry on very late having closed doors of the house at night. Although the disease of Hyster-malaise increases as a result, and my head feels more dizzy due to wakefulness yet I don't care and continue with my work". (Ibid. Vol. 2, p. 376) 3) "Hazrat Khalifat-ul-Masih-ul-Awwal said to hazrat promised Masih: "Your Honour! Ghulam Nabi suffers from Melancholia." The honourable was pleased to reply: "In a way, all the prophets suffered from Melancholia and I also suffer from the same". (Seerat-ul-Mahdi, p-304, V. 3). 4) "Doctor Mir Muhammad Ismail Sahib told me that he had heard many times from hazrat sahib, the promised Masih, that he suffered from Hysteria and also mentioned Melancholia. But the truth is that signs of nervous disorders developed in him only as a result of his diligent mental work and day and night preoccupations with literary compositions. These are often seen in patients of Hysteria (and Melancholia) also." (Seerat-ul-Mahdi, Vol. 2, p. 55). 5) "This disease, having occurred once in the family, was bound to penetrate into the next off- spring. Therefore hazrat Khilafat-ul-Masih Thani, Mian Mahmud Ahmad Sahib told me that occasionally, he also got an attack of Hyster- Malaise". (From: Article written by Doctor Shah Nawaz Sahib Qadiani, reproduced in Magazine 'Review Of Religions,' Qadian, August, 1926 p. 11). 6) "The cause of all his troubles such as vertigo, headache, sleeplessness, heart cramps, indigestion, diarrhoea, excessive urination and hystermalaise was only one and that was his weakness of nerves". (From the magazine: 'Review Qadian, May 1927, p. 26). 7) "Some patient of Melancholia think: "I am king"; Some think "I am God", some think "I am Prophet." (From Bayaz-Noor-ud-Din p. 212, Vol. 10). COMMENTS We have sufficed here to give only seven opinions and findings from all those who are Qadianis and it is possible to give more opinions as well but for the-sake of brevity we stop. However, it is confirmed without any doubt that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was Hyster-maniac. It shall be worthwhile to give medical opinion of experts of Medicine on this disease of Melancholia-- Hyster-Malaise. It will be noted that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad suffered from them all. (a) From: 'Qanoon', Part One, Book three, Author Shaikh-ur-Raees. Boo Ali Seena: "Melancholia is that malady in which worries and anxieties take the form of imagined horrors and dreads as opposed to the normal. Its cause is atrabilious temperament which takes away the entire essence of brain, leaving the patient effectually distracted. Or the other cause of this malady is extreme heating-up of the liver called Hyster-malaise. What happens is that excrements of victuals and intestinal disorders through vapours collect in the liver and humours of the hody burn up and take the form of mania. Then black fumes arise from these parts and go towards the head. It is this condition which is called melancholic- flatulence, melancholic-fumigation or melancholic- hystermalaise". ( From: ' Sharah-ul Asbab wal Alamat-Amraz, Malikhoiia'. Author: Allama Burhan ud I}in Nafees. "When thoughts and ideas change from the normal path into fears and disorders it is called Melancholia.. With some patient this disturbance reaches to such limits that he starts to consider himself a Diviner, with a knowledge of hidden things. He informs in advance of what is going to happen later.. this disease increases in some patient so much so that he thinks himself to have been transformed into an angel." © From: Same Author above: "There is a branch of Melancholia, called Hystermania. This is caused by strong black bile that accumulates in the digestive tract. From that part of the body in which this matter accumulates rise black vapours that envelop brain. Its symptoms are: belching out bitter fumes, finding food tasteless, deliciousness of eatables reduced, worsening of digestion, belly infla- tion, stool liquefaction and rising of smoke-like fumes. " (d) From: 'Makhzan-e-Hikmat' Second Edition Author Sh~msul Atibba, Hakim Doctor Ghulam Jilani. "Previous theory was that this disease manifested itself into disorders, arising from animal faculty or from those vital principles of amiability that originate from liver or digestive tract. But later researches indicate that this disease takes from nerves.. in the menfolk nervous internal system produces weak- nesses of brain and is called Hyster-malaise. "Symptoms of this disease are: patient's letharginess and his anxiousness. He develops feelings of egotism, conceit and self-estimation. He is apt to exaggerate in his conversations, feels little appetite and suffers from Dyspepsia". (e) F om: 'Ikseer-e-Azam,' Volume one, p. 189 Author Hakim Muhammad Azam Khan. Symptoms of this disease are: digestive disorders, bitter vaporous belches, constant mouth watering, belly flatulence, bowels grumbling, stomach inflated and heated, false appetite vapours rising towards palate in fumes.. Sometimes upper part of the body shivers and shakes, knock-down in severe attack, fainting and swooning..... sudden forgetfulness, drooping eye-lids, suffocation while swallowing, sudden lightning-like sparkle flashing in front of the eyes ....... (f) From: Same Author above: "Patient, if a religious scholar, lays claim to miracles, to prophet hood and to supernatural powers. He talks of Divinity and preaches to men." COMMENTS All the symptoms laid down by the experts of Medicine were present in Mirza to the utmost extent. Very true, he was a patient of Melancholic Hyster- malaise. There can be no better statement than the categorical pronouncement of no less a person than the so-called 'Khalifat ul Masih Thani, Mian Mahmud Ahmad himself, in which he said that the disease of Hysteria was present in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad: "Men also have this disease and those who suffer from this are called Hyster-Maniacs." (From Friday Sermon, by Mian Mahmud Ahmad, Khalifa Qadian, reproduced in Newspaper, 'Al-Fazl' Qadian Vol.10, dated April 30, 1923). Mirza laid claims, very intensely, right from prophethood to Godhood. He called himself superior to all revered prophets and claimed to have performed one million miracles. He also claimed to be the King of the Aryans! He invited people to adopt his religion and those who rejected him he called them atheists, 'Kafirs' and Hellish folks. He found faults with all the Prophets, (peace upon them all) called respectful Companions of Our Prophet (Allah be pleased with them all), as silly fools, and abused the saints of the entire Ummat. He called Quranic commentators erring folks. He reproached narrators of the Traditions and categorised Ulemas of the Ummat with Jews. He dubbed the whole Ummat as "gone astray from lhe path" and passed obscene remarks against learned men and pious persons. Can a godly person or a religious revivalist stoop so low? Certainly, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a maniac of Melancholic-Hyster-malaise. A HEART-FELT SUBMISSION TO QADIANIS With utmost sincerity of heart, I make this submission to you. (1) It is possible that contents of this article have displeased you at places but my part is actually this much that I have quoted from Mirza's own writings. Making those a basis, I have evaluated facts. If you don't agree with my evaluation then I leave it to ye u to judge for yourselves his truth or falsehood on the touchstone of his writings. (2) I tell you that all our revered prophets were most dignified souls. What to speak of them, even respectable saints and pious elders of our Ummat never tied challenges of truth/untruth. Their call to righteousness was direct. Here we find Mirza stipulating horrible bids for his veracity again and again. No sooner did he lose the wager, he tied another. Can such a gamble ever be a modus- operandi of chosen souls of Allah's faithful creatures? This point alone should suffice to guide anyone to truth provided Allah has bestowed him with judgement and insight. (3) Have you noticed that whereas Mirza risked his entire career over these gambles, Allah the Exalted, on the other hand, if I may say so, vowed to let Mirza never succeed in saying a thing, conditional on his truth. Anything Mirza would say, Allah would bring it to naught. For example, Mirza swore: 'Sultan Muhammad will die'; 'Abdulla Atham will die'; 'Sanaullah will die'; 'Abdul Haq Ghaznavi will die'; and so on and so forth, "else call me a liar." Against this was the fated Ordainment that the more he would resort to swearings the more impossible they would become. Indeed, it was a limit on the part of Mirza that when predicting about the death of an unholy Christian, he acknowledged himself to be 'the greatest accursed man on the earth' if that did not happen. And true enough, it did not happen. Allah, the Exalted, lefused Mirza's plea against a defiled 'Worshipper of Cross.' Is 'here any instance to compare with it?' For Allah's sake. yonder over it. (4) Last and not the least O Brethrell-in-humanity! Think over this situation: If on the Day of Judgement, Allah the Exalted, puts this Question to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad why did you mislead people by claiming to be a prophet after Hazrat 'Khatam-Un-Nabieen ? And in reply? if Mirza submits: "Ya Allah! I was a patient of Melancholic-Hyster-malaise. I told my people that I was a 'Miraqi' and even wrote it so in my books. Doctors said I was a maniac of Hysteria. Pray ask these 'sages' (the Qadianis) why did they follow nonsensical eruptions of a diseased 'Miraqi' maniac and accepted me as their Prophet and Masih". Then? my Brethren-in-humanity, what will you say in reply to Allah? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Character of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani (the founder of the Ahmadiyya Cult) Mirza Ghulam Qadiani was born in 1839-40 in the county of Qadian, Gordaspur district in Punjab, India, to a Mughal family. His father's name was Ghulam Murtada and his mother's name was Charagh Bibi. Mirza's family was in the service of the British government and represented the British interest to the extent of supporting the British forces during the Islamic War of Independence. Mirza received his early education from his father and other teachers of the village and was given a humble job in the office of the Deputy Commissioner. During his employment, he participated in and failed promotional exams for better assignments. Discouraged with his failures, he returned home to take care of the family business. Up to this period in his life, Mirza Qadiani was an ordinary Muslim; he had the Aqeedah (the belief) of Muslims and believed in the finality of the Prophet Muhammad . At about the same time, British government, wary of anti-British Islamic movements in India, ordered the creation of an Apostolic Prophet to subdue the spirit of Jihad (striving against oppressors) in Muslims (British Parliament Report 1870). In 1871, Mirza Ghulam was elected to the post of Apostolic Prophet. Between 1882 and 1890, like a confused story-teller trying to get his fable straight, Mirza made numerous unfounded and conflicting claims; among these are his assertions to be a Mujaddid (a revivalist), Musleh (a reformer), Mehdi (a divinely guided one), and Masih Mawoud (the Promised Messiah). In the year 1890, he declared that Jihad and resistance to British rule had become unlawful; in 1901, he claimed prophethood for himself; and, in 1904, he claimed to be Krishna (Hindu Lord). In short, Mirza Qadiani spent much of his adult life fabricating lies against Allah (SWT), insulting the Prophets of Allah, declaring false prophecies, committing acts of treason against Muslims, lying, cheating, and deceiving simple minded Muslims, and serving the British by discouraging and eliminating the concept of Jihad from Islam. The height of his shameless attempt at deception is best stated in his own message to Governor of Punjab, in 1898, reminding him that he is the "self implanted and self cultivated seedling of British Raj," who has been a loyal servant to the British rule. Mirza uttered such non-sense Kufr in his books as "I am God, in my vision, I am a woman, Allah showed his manly power with me and metaphorically I became pregnant"! Contrary to his own "Prophecies" and "revelations", Mirza died on May 26, 1908, in his own hated disease of cholera. Obviously, he was not Mehdi, Messiah, or a Prophet. He was rather an immoral and treacherous opportunist guided by his hunger for wealth and power. His claim to be the promised Messiah is not much different from the present day claims of David Koresh, Jim Jones, and Charles Manson. The followers of these cults are now well known in the West; by God's leave, we shall reveal the truth about the Qadiani leadership to the world. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WHAT IS QADIANISM? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QADIYANISAM..... ....dishounours ALLAH (SWT), the creator Where can the human escape from that being in whose hands is every atom. He says: I will come seceretly like theives. (Roohani Khazaa'in Page 39, Vol. 20) ..claims divinity for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. I (Mirza) saw in a dream that I am God. I have belived that I am God. (Rohanni Khazaa'in Page 564, Vol 5) ...teaches that the door of prophethood is open, even after the final prophet Muhammad This fact is established like the day that the door of prophethood is open after prophet Muhammad (S A W) (Haqeeqatun Nubuwah Page 228) ...debases the greatest of all Prophets, Muhammad Prophet Muhammad and his sahabah used to eat cheese made by the christians, although it was well known that pig's fat was used in its making. (Al Fadhal, Qadiyaan 22nd Febuary1924) ..claims that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is Muhammad! the messenger of Allah (SWT). ..Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelivers and merciful amoungst themselves. In this divine revelation, I have been named Muhammad and also Rasool. (Roohani Khazain Page 207, Vol 18) One who differentiated between me and the Mustupha has neither seen me or recognised me. (Roohani Khazain Page 258-259 Vol 16) ... Teaches that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed is superior to Prophet Muhammad ..Muhammad has decended amungst us once again and he is more greater in status than ever before. Whosoever wants to see Muhammad should see Ghulam Ahmad in Qadian. (Badr, Qadiyan 25th october 1906) ...propogates that Mirza is superior to all the Prophets And Allah (SWT) is showing so many signs for me that if they were shown in the time of Noah, those people would not have drowned . (Rohhani Khazain Page 575 Vol 22) Yousuf of this UMMAH, i.e this humble one is greater than Israeli yousuf. (Rohhani Khazain page 99 Vol 21) Although many prophets have come into this world, I am no less in knowledge and recognition of ALLAH than any of them. (Rohhani Khazain Page 240 Vol 18) Leave the mention of Ibne Maryam (Easaa Alaihe sallam); Ghulam Ahmad is better than him. (Rohhani Khazain Page 240 Vol 18) ...teaches hatred towards Hazrat Easaa Alayhis sallam, one of the greatest prophets of ALLAH (Jesus) had the habit of uttering obscenities and frequently using foul language. (Rohhani Khazain Page 289 Vol 11) It should be remembered that he (Jesus) also had top some extent the habit of lying. (Rohhani Khazain Page 289 Vol 11) Jesus could not portray himself as a pious man because people know him as a gluttonus alcoholic. (Rohhani Khazain Page 296 Vol 10)

JazakAllah Bahi Bari Malomati POst Hai Thnx 4 Sharing Allah Hafiz

WalawKum Salam WaRehmatullah Hi Wa Barakaatuhu WelCome Islami Bahi Nice To See You In This Beautiful Site I Hope You Will Enjoy Allah Hafiz

Ijtima Main Zaroor Shirkat Farmain Aor Mazeed Islami bahion Ka Sath Le Janey Ki Tarkeeb Banain

Waalekumsalam WelCome Islami Bahi

Walaekum Salam Kushaamdeed Islami Bahi umeed Hai Ap Is Piyari Site Ka Visit Kartay Rahain Gay Allah Hafiz Allah Hafiz

Madina Yeah Xp Sp2 Pro Corp Hai Aor Yeah Theme Jo Main Ne Use Kia Hai Yeah Xp Ka Nahi Hai Yeah Crystal Clear Theme Hai.

JazakAllah Madina Mujay ISi Ki Talash ti Lekin Madina Ooper do Tasveeron Main Safinat-un-Nijat Ahle-Sunnat-Wa-Al-Jamat Ka Zikar Hai Is Ka Kya Matlab Hai Plz If You Tell Me About This Allah Hafiz Ya Attar Al Madad Humain Ghos-e-Aazam Se Piyar Hai InshahAllah Humara Bera Par Hai

meray Khiyal Se Ap Se Barh Ker Koi Jahil Nahi Ap Pehle masg To Par Liya Karo Pir Tabsaray Kiya Karo Yeah Parh Kar Batana K Haram Khoor kon hai.. http://www.islamimehfil.info/forum/index.php?showtopic=1009 In Per Haram Khoor Honey Ka Fatwa Lagao Jin K Baray Main TUm Is Site Se Bohat Kuch Per Chokay Hoo. Ab b Waqt Hai Toba Kar Lo Aor Aoliya -e-Allah k Maslak Ko Apna Lo..

Madina Yeah b Kabar Kulnay K Bad Ki Tasveer HAi Lekin Farq Bohat Hai Kyon K Yeah Dawat-e-Islami Wala Hai Jis Per Aaqa S.A.W ki Nazr-e-Karam Hai Hame Dawat-e-Islami Se Piyar Hai Inshahallah Humara Bera Par Hai Ya Attar Al Madad

Muj Ko Yeah Sms Mila to Is Ko par Kar Main Kuch parishan Ho Gia Hoon Kya Ap Meri Paishani Door Kar Saktay Hain?