Ya Allah Madad

Bhai Salar sahab..Hamare pyare Nabi wo peghamber hein jinho ne apni ummat ko Bait ul khalah jane se laykar Baitullah ke tawaf tak ka tareeka batay hay..zindagi ka koi shoba unho ne nahi chora jis mein unki ummat yahan wahan dekhay ..Peda hone se marne tak aik aik lamha kayse guzarna hay..kon sa kaam kaysay karna hay..humko bata gaey wo.. Ab tum log jo murde ke sath uske marne ke baad ye jo bhi harktein kar rahay ho..mujhay ye batao Allah ke Rasool aik musalman ke marne ke baad is kaam mein rehnumai karna bhool gaey thay kia..agar unho ne ye kaam kia ya karne bola to uska suboot quran o sunnat e sahaba se sabit karoo..warna ye tasleem karo ke Rasool ye ahad nama aur shajra wali baat batana bhool gaey thay ..hum usko kar rahay hein.. The best word is the Word of Allah [the Qur'an], and the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad . (Ibn Majah)

Malik Sahab ye hamare aik dost ka challanging article hay aap logon ke liye ..aaj tak koi qadyani iska jawab nahi day saka: In the Name of Allah, The Most Compassionate, The Most Merciful, The One and Only. His Love and Peace be upon Syedna Muhammad, after whom there is no Prophet, and upon his family and Companions. Insha Allah, Masha Allah CAN AHMADIS/QADIANIS ANSWER? by Illias Suttar Cash Reward: 10,000,000/ - (approx. US$ 250,000.00) Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims of Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah have now been proven conclusively false. If anyone can prove the points of this article to be wrong in the Supreme Court of any reputed country like UK, USA, German, Japan, Pakistan, India, Israel, etc., he will receive cash reward of Pak Rs.10,000,000/- (Ten Million). You can prove my arguments wrong in the supreme court of any country like USA, UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, Germany, France, Italy, etc. You can prove my arguments wrong even in my absence!!! A Qadiani / Ahmadi judge is also acceptable even in my absence!!! The first Qadiani / Ahmadi to make the case against me will get cash reward Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) before the start of the arguments. In Pakistani newspapers, I have advertised that if any Qadiani / Ahmadi will come to me for discussions, I will pay Rs. 500/- cash to him. If any non-Ahmadi / Qadiani brings an Ahmadi / Qadiani, then he will get Rs.500/- cash for bringing the Ahmadi / Qadiani. Introductory Notes Alhamdolillah, they have been intellectually defeated. A Prominent Ahmadi, Mr. Ahmad Baksh Channa, a Qadiani Murabbi for years, has embraced Islam along with other several others who witnessed the written debate. In the following article, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani’s claim of being the Mahdi and the Promised Messiah have been conclusively proven to be wrong, by bringing to light contradiction in his own argument from his books. The particular argument of Mirza Sahib which was claimed to be dazzling like the sun, and according to his followers made his opponents ran way from him like lambs run away from lion, has been proven wrong beyond doubt. Since the fallacy of these claims have been exposed, Mirza Sahib’s claim of being a Nabi or a Prophet also automatically becomes bogus. A True Nabi cannot make false claim. This article was originally made public, before 1982. More than 16 years have passed but no one has been able to deny the points of this article or prove the contrary. The points of this article have been twice put to the present IVth "Khalifa", Mirza Tahir Ahmad Qadiani, but he has maintained complete silence. I even went inside the Ahmadiyya Hall, an Ahmadi Center in Magazine Line, Karachi, where I distributed this article in the hall and spoke to those who were coming inside to pray. I attended the funeral of one learned Qadiani. In the graveyard, as well as in the funeral bus while coming back, I explained the article to them. On 4-7-1983, Mr. Rahim Younus Qadiani wrote from Dhaka, Bangladesh, that one learned Ahmadi is going to answer to me. Almost 15 years have passed away, but till now there is no answer. Naseem Ahmad, gave a reply to "Can Ahmadis Answer?" and entitled it, "An Ahmadi Answers". The grandson of the "Khalifa" Mirza Tahir, Mubasshir Ahmad composed it on the computer. However, later on, after nearly 5 hours of discussions, the grandson said that now only he has understood the question. He promised to return with proper reply. He went away never to return again. I have had written discussions with many other Qadianis as well. Those who are interested can get copies of such correspondence from me. It is interesting to see how they have expressed views opposite to what Mirza Sahib has written. Many Qadianis have even admitted that Mirza Sahib has made a mistake, but they take the plea that Mirza Sahib was a human being and so he could make a mistake. However, time will make them realize, Insha Allah, that it wasn’t a small mistake. This grave mistake was committed while trying to prove his claims to the office of Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah. If the arguments put forward to prove his claim have been proven wrong, naturally the claim was also wrong. If one claim is wrong the whole Ahmadiyyat becomes a heap of debris. I had offered Rs. One Crore (10,000,000) to any Ahmadi who will defeat me in any Supreme Court. One Ahmadi, Naseem Ahmad of Karachi, accused me that One Crore will not be paid, if I loose the case. He said that, to start the case, Rs.15,000/- cash will be needed. I even offered Rs.15,000/- in advance, which he refused to accept. Did he knew in his heart that he will be a loser? The facts mentioned in this article, which have embarrassed Qadianis during the discussions, are taken from the following four books of Mirza Sahib: Masih Hindustan Mein Chasma-e-Masihi Anjam-e-Atham Kashti-e-Nuh An interesting development is that the present "Khalifa" of Qadianis has warned his followers about me. He spoke for more than two hours on their so-called Muslim Television Ahmadiyya and cautioned the Qadianis that a "Fitna" (temptation) is going to come. To save the faith from that "Fitna" (temptation), he reminded his followers of miracles which were to be remembered when facing the "Fitna" (temptation). Mentioning Zia ul Haq’s plane accident, he claimed that this accident happened to Zia ul Haq because of what he had done to the Qadianis. Obviously, it is an intellectual defeat for the "Khalifa" and the whole Ahmadiyya Community. Instead of coming up with logical arguments to counteract my proofs, the "Khalifa" has taken refuge in so-called miracles. Miracles or perhaps some Accident? Allah knows best. I am producing this article here with a challenge to all Qadianis / Ahmadis. Try to prove my arguments wrong in a Court of Law and get Pak. Rs.10,000,000/-. Extract from Daily Newspaper ‘Inqilab’ Karachi, Pakistan of 27th December 1997 in which the reporter gave an interview of an important Ahmadi / Qadiani: "Illias Suttar is in such a way after us as if he has nothing else to do. For a long time we gave him no lift thinking that it does not matter if someone keeps on barking. But now it seems as if he will not only bark but will bite us. And we will have to take 14 injections to save our lives. We Qadianis and Ahmadis are so scared of Illias Suttar as if he is a ghost…… Illias Suttar is not wanting any property from us, he is just wanting an answer to his article: 'Can Ahmadis / Qadianis Answer?'" On 12/12/1997, Chowdhry Mobasshir Ahmadi who is the grandson of the "Khalifa" of Ahmadis / Qadianis said in the presence of 5 or 6 persons in the shop of Mr. Aslam in Qartaba Market, Bahadurabad, Karachi: "Announce on my behalf: I will give a fantastic reply – but there is no time limit". On 2/3/1998, I (Illias Suttar) accompanied by Sarwar Rao, Chief Editor, Monthly Newsnet (International), Karachi, went to Al Noor Hall in Gulberg, Karachi, which is the prayer place (mosque) of Ahmadis / Qadianis). I met the Imam Sahib whose name is Mr. Dawood. I asked him to start a case in any supreme court to prove wrong the points of my article. He replied that "We do not recognise the judges of the earth. We have left the decision (on Illias Suttar’s article) in the Hands of the Judge in the sky"! In the Name of Allah, The Most Compassionate, The Most Merciful, The One and Only. His Love and Peace be upon Syedna Muhammad, after whom there is no Prophet, and upon his family and Companions. Insha Allah, Masha Allah CAN AHMADIS/QADIANIS ANSWER? by Illias Suttar Cash Reward: 10,000,000/ - (approx. US$ 250000.00) Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims of Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah have now been proven conclusively false. Cash Reward Rs: 10,000,000/- (approx. US$ 250,000.00) Main Article Mirza Ghulam Ahmad rejected the fundamental Muslim doctrine of the second coming of Hazrat Isa ibne Maryam. Instead, he claimed that Hazrat Isa had died his natural death and even claimed to have located his grave in Khanyar Street, Srinagar, Kashmir. Mirza Sahib wrote a book "Jesus in India" where he gave a detailed account of what he claimed to have actually happened at the cross. According to him Jesus was put to the cross by the Jews on Friday; Jesus fainted and Jews thought that he had died. He was buried; but three days later, he regained consciousness and came out of the grave. He was 33 years old at that time. He met his disciples and secretly migrated to India, where he died at the age of 120 years. Let us have a look at the following extracts from this book: "Hence, I shall prove in this book that Jesus (Peace be upon him) did not die on the cross neither did he go up to the heavens nor it should ever be hoped that he will return to the earth from the heavens; rather, he died at the age of 120 years in Srinagar in Kashmir, and his grave is in the Khanyar Region of Srinagar." (Maseeh Hindustan Mein, (Jesus in India) Roohani Khazain, vol.15, p.14) "Authentic narrations of hadith prove that our holy Prophet (pbuh) said in the person of Jesus two such qualities were combined which were not present in any other prophet. Firstly, he lived his full life, i.e. he was alive for 125 years. Secondly, he toured most of the parts of the world…now it is obvious if he had ascended to heavens at the age of only 33 years, then the tradition of 125 years would not have been correct, neither he could have toured at such a young age of 33. These traditions are not only mentioned in the authentic and ancient books of hadith, but they are so popular among all the sects of Muslims that none can be imagined more famous." (Maseeh Hindustan Mein {Jesus in India}, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, pp. 55-56) Christian Era (AD) begins with the birth of Hazrat Isa ibne Maryam (Jesus) in 1 AD. Hazrat Isa, according to Mirza Sahib, died at the age of 120 years, meaning 120 AD. Now, let us examine the following extract from "Anjam-e-Atham", written by Mirza Sahib: "The Holy Quran clearly says that the Masih was lifted to the heavens after his death. Therefore his descent is symbolic and not real. And in the verse ‘Falamma Tawaffeteni’ it has been clearly manifested that death of Hazrat Isa (pbuh) has already taken place. Because the meaning of the verse is that the Christians will go astray after the death of Hazrat Isa (pbuh) and not during his lifetime. So if we assume that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) is not yet dead, then we will have to agree that the Christians are not yet digressed, and this is absolutely false. Rather the verse is saying that the Christians remained faithful only until the life-time of Hazrat Isa (pbuh). From this it becomes known that corruption had already begun during the time of Disciples. If the period of the Disciples had been such that the Christians had still been on right path, then in this verse Allah would not have linked it with the life-time of Hazrat Isa (pbuh) only, but would have included the life time of the disciples as well. Thus at this juncture a very good point of the period of corruption in Christianity is illustrated and which is that IN TRUTH, during the time of the Disciples themselves, the seeds of SHIRK (associating partner with God) were sown in Christianity. (Anjam-e-Atham, Roohani Khazain, vol. 11, p.321) The important points from the above extracts are: Mirza Sahib claims to give proof from hadith that Hazrat Isa died at the age of 125. He asserts that Christians were on right path only during the life time of Hazrat Isa. He states that Hazrat Isa was not made God or son of God during his life time. Seeds of SHIRK (Trinity) were sown after the death of Hazrat Isa. During the life time of Hazrat Isa, there was no possibility of such a digression. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed is quoting the verse "Falamma Tawaffeteni" (5:117) from Quran, implying that Allah is guaranteeing protection from such corruption (Shirk i.e. Trinity) during the life of Hazrat Isa only. Since Mirza Sahib has stated in his book "Jesus in India" that Hazrat Isa died in 120 AD, the seeds of association of Partners with Allah (i.e. Trinity) could not have been planted before 120 AD. This means that Hazrat Isa was made God and son of God only after the year 120 A.D. Before 120 A.D., not even one single individual could have held the belief that Hazrat Isa is God or son of God. Thus, the year of 120 A.D. became a turning point. (Chasma-e-Maseehi, Roohani Khazain, vol. 20, p.375) "And in the very first instance, he (Paul) implanted the bad seedling of Trinity in Damascus. And this Pauline Trinity started from Damascus. It is towards this that hadith Shareef has hinted that the future Maseeh will descend on the eastern side of Damascus." (Chasma-e-Maseehi, Roohani Khazain, vol. 20, p.377) In this book, Chasma-e-Maseehi, Mirza Sahib has clearly stated that St. Paul was responsible for the doctrine of Holy Trinity and thus turning Hazrat Isa into God. It is a well known fact that St. Paul died in 64 AD or 67 AD. The book ‘The 100’ gives the year of his death as 64 AD. Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics says: "That he suffered martyrdom at Rome there can be no doubt…the date will lie between A.D. 64 and 67, most probably nearer the former than the later limit." (Encyclopaedia, vol. 9, p.694) Final Arguments In the book "Jesus in India", according to Mirza Sahib, Hazrat Isa died in 120 AD. In the book "Anjam-e-Atham", Mirza Sahib has clearly stated that the seeds of Trinity were not sown until 120 A.D. In the book "Anjam-e-Atham", Mirza Sahib has clearly said that St. Paul made Hazrat Isa God. Paul died in 64 or 65 A.D. where as Hazrat Isa died in 120 A.D. Therefore Paul died at least 55 years before Hazrat Isa. (Jesus) Since Paul must have given the doctrine of Trinity during his life time, this means the Hazrat Isa was made God at least 55 years before his own death. In other words, by 65 A.D. Hazrat Isa was made God/Son of God while he died 55 years later in 120 A.D. While he (Jesus) was alive in Kashmir, he was being worshipped as God in Palestine. Thus Mirza Sahib’s commentary on the Holy Quran’s verse 5:117 (Falamma Tawaffetenni) in his book "Anjam-e-Atham", that Christians made Hazrat Isa God after the death of Hazrat Isa in 120 A.D., becomes absolutely wrong. Is this a small mistake for a man claiming to have been divinely ordained to be Messiah, Mahdi and a Prophet? Such a grievous error? So obviously and utterly wrong! So conclusively wrong! On Page 135 of his book "Anjam Atham", Mirza Ghulam Ahmed says: "If Jesus is alive in the heavens, then the Christians must be on the right path (on earth)". Will the Qadianis / Ahmadis reflect? (Please see point no. 6 above.) If Mirza Sahib were alive and this question had been put to him, could he have said: "I am a human being and I can make mistakes"? Mirza Sahib had claimed help of Allah in these arguments. Can Allah be wrong? No! Only the claim of Mirza Sahib is wrong. If he can be wrong in one thing, what proof is there that he is not wrong in other things? The reason for Mirza Saheb's entire exercise of trying to prove that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) had died was to establish his own claim of being the Promised Messiah and Mahdi. His argument was that, since Hazrat Isa has died, he will not return, as that would be against the principles of Allah. Thus, someone else will have to take up the role of Hazrat Isa and that someone is none other than Mirza Sahib himself! However, the above arguments have proven conclusively that Mirza Ghulam could not substantiate his claim of being Imam Mahdi and the Promised Messiah. Therefore, he is neither Imam Mahdi nor the Promised messiah. As a corollary, he is not a Prophet, because a true Prophet will not make a false claim. Q.E.D., Q.E.D., Q.E.D., Q.E.D., Q.E.D. Another Interesting Point He secretely migrated to India, lived there for 87 more years, and died at the age of 120 in Srinagar, Kashmir. He kept no contact with the people of Palestine for these 87 years. People in Palestine did not know that Hazrat Isa was alive in Kashmir and Hazrat Isa did not know that the people in Palestine had begun to worship him as God and son of God. Therefore, (according to Qadiani claims) in the original land (Palestine) where he was sent as Messenger and where he was made God and son of God, he kept careful watch only till the age of 33 and for the remaining 87 years of his life he kept no watch over them at all! What a glaring mistake (in tafseer)! Remember: All this is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani’s assertions and we have only his words for them. Will the Qadianis, his followers, kindly clarify the above points or rectify their belief? May Allah help them to understand what is right and what is wrong and give them the courage to follow the right path. Ameen. All praise to Allah. His Love and Peace be upon His Noble Prophet, Hazrat Muhammad and upon His family and Companions. Sir Syed vs Mirza Saheb The Qadiyanis are very proud of saying that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib was the first man after so many years who said that Jesus (Hazrat Isa) (pbuh) did not go to the heavens ,but died on earth in Kashmir. Mr. Nasim Ahmad, who wrote "An Ahmadi Answers", said that Mirza Sahib first came to know from Allah about Hazrat Isa’s natural death on earth in the year 1891. Mr. Nasim Ahmad should know that Sir Syed had made a similar claim 9 years before, in the year 1882, in his Tafsir of Quran Majid. Sir Syed wrote his Tafsir of Quran Majid in 6 volumes as follows (see page 335 of the book "Sir Syed Ahmad Khan" by Fazal Karim): Part 1 in year 1880 Part 2 in year 1882 Part 3 in year 1885 Part 4 in year 1886 Part 5 in year 1892 Part 6 in year 1895 In part no.2, year 1882, in Sura Maida, verse no. 117, Sir Syed layed claim to the death of Hazrat Isa (pbuh). 9 years later in 1891, Mirza Saheb copied Sir Syed. Is it in good taste that Qadiayanis are boasting today about Mirza Sahib's plagiarism? In the name of Allah, The Most Compassionate, The Most Merciful, The One and Only. His Love and Peace be upon Syedna Muhammad, after whom there is no Prophet, and upon his family and Companions. Insha Allah, Masha Allah CAN AHMADIS/QADIANIS ANSWER? by Illias Suttar More Contradictions I wish Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib were Alive! Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian claimed to be Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah, Two in One. It is an accepted Muslim doctrine that Hazrat Isa (Jesus) (pbuh) will descend from heavens and will help Imam Mahdi in the propagation of Islam and fill the world with justice. When people asked Mirza Ghulam about Jesus, the son of Mary, Mirza Sahib replied that Jesus will not descend from heavens because he never went to heavens; rather he went to Kashmir, where he died at the age of 120! In support of his claim, Mirza Sahib wrote a book called ‘Messiah in India (Maseeh in Hindustan)’. Quran says celibacy not prescribed in Christianity, but Mirza Sahib says the opposite. Mirza Sahib says: "And just as Injeel has preached celibacy, similarly in Buddha’s teachings it is desired; and just as an earthquake came on putting the Jesus to the cross, similarly it is written that an earthquake came on the death of Buddha. Thus the main reason for all such similarities is that out of good fortune for the Buddhists, Maseeh came to Hindustan and stayed for a long time amongst Buddhists and they received detailed knowledge on his life and his preachings. Consequently it was inevitable that a great part of that teaching and ceremonials should have found its way into Buddhists records for Jesus was respected and taken for the Buddha by the Buddhists These people therefore recorded his sayings in their books and ascribed them to the Buddha." (Maseeh Hindustan Mein, Roohani Khazain, vol.15, P.78) On the other hand, the Holy Quran says (57:27) that monasticism was invented by Christians. Monasticism includes all ways of detaching oneself from mankind, specially state of celibacy: "Then We caused Our messengers to follow in their footsteps; and We caused Jesus, son of Mary, to follow, and gave him the Gospel, and placed compassion and mercy in the hearts of those who followed him. But monasticism they invented - We ordained it not for them - only seeking Allah’s pleasure, and they observed it not with right observance. So, We give those of them who believed their reward, but many of them are evil-livers." (al-Quran 57:27) But contrary to this verse, Mirza Sahib says that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) preached the doctrine of Chastity and Celibacy. Who is to be believed? The Holy Quran or the word of Mirza Ghulam? Hazrat Isa pbuh - Prophet for Bani Israel or Prophet for Buddhists? Bagwa Matteyya, whose other name was Maseeh came to this land, because the failure of a prophecy makes that religion bogus." (Maseeh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol 15, p.84) "Every Buddhist must necessarily profess the belief that five hundred years after the Buddha, the Bagwa (white) Metteyya did appear in their land." (Maseeh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, p.92) "There can be no doubt that he came in the colours of Buddha and the Book of Oldenburg with reference to Buddha’s Book, Lkavati Sutta, it is written that the followers of Buddha used to console themselves with the hope of future that they will achieve the fruits of salvation by becoming the follower of Metteyya. i.e. they had confidence that Metteyya will appear among them and they will attain salvation through him, because the words in which Buddha had given them the hope of Metteyya they were clearly proving that his followers will meet Metteyya. Now with this statement of this book, confidence is generated in the heart that God had created means of their guidance from both sides…and no one can doubt that those moral teachings and spiritual ways which were established by Buddha, the teachings of Hazrat Maseeh have regenerated them in this world." (Maseeh in India, Roohani Khazain vol. 15 pp. 81-82) How could Hazrat Isa (pbuh) go to preach among non-Bani Israel on the basis of divine revelation of Buddha? Is this not against our and your faith which states that Hazrat Isa (PBUH) was sent to Bani Israel only? To further clarify that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) went to all Buddhists whether they were Israelites or not, Mirza Sahib quotes Buddha as saying that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) will come from outside to the land of Prophecy, Magadh, in which the people were dark. And Buddha himself was dark. And since all the Buddhists are included in this prophecy, common sense says that non-Israelites are also included, since all Buddhists were not Israelites. Another Hypocrisy of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (Maseeh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, p.81) Gospel of Barnabas and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Ignorance Mirza Sahib says: "After all that has been stated, it should be kept in mind that the Gospel of Barnabas, which must be available in the British Museum, it is stated that Jesus was not crucified nor did he die on the Cross. Now we can very well say though this book is not included in the Gospels and has been rejected summarily, yet there is no doubt that it is an ancient book and it belongs to the period in which the other Gospels were written. Is it not open to us to regard this ancient book as a book of history of ancient times and make use of it as a book of history?" (Masseh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, p.21) Perhaps Mirza Sahib did not read the Gospel of Barnabas himself, for in the Bible of Barnabas, it is clearly mentioned that Hazrat Muhammad (SAAW) will be the last Prophet, and only false Prophets will come after him. Please see the following extract from the Bible of Barnabas: "Isa (pbuh) said in that Messenger’s coming who will wipe out all false ideas about me. His religion will spread all over the earth. Sardar Kahin asked: After the coming of the Messenger of God will more Prophets come? Isa(pbuh) said: After him not true Prophet will come. But many false Prophets will come." (Gospel of Barnabas, Urdu Edition, p. 143) "Then the disciples asked: O Master, who is that man who you mention will come to earth? With great happiness Isa (pbuh) replied: He is Muhammad (SAAW), Messenger of Allah. When he will come, just as rain brings out fruits from earth when there has been no rain for a long time, in the same way with the unlimited Mercy and Blessings with which he will come, he will be the cause of many good and virtuous deeds." (Gospel of Barnabas, p.228, Urdu Version) Mirza Sahib admits that the gospel of Barnabas is an ancient historical document, written at the same time as other Gospels. He presents one of its statements to support his claim. But what he didn’t know was that it not only mentions the coming of Hazrat Muhammad (SAAW), but also the finality of his Prophethood or did he? If he had, what right did Mirza Ghulam have to claim that he is a Prophet? Why did he take one statement as a proof and ignored the other one. Perhaps he had never read the Gospel! Is Adam (pbuh) still alive? Did Mirza Sahib die at the age of 30? "There is another important statement by the Holy Prophet. During his last illness, the Holy Prophet said to his daughter Fatima: ‘Once a year Gabriel used to recite the Quran to me. This year he recited twice. He also told me that every succeeding Prophet has lived up to half the age of his predecessor. He told me that Jesus, son of Mary, lived to 120 years. Therefore, I think, I may live to about 60 years." (Invitation to Ahmadiyyat (Da’awat-ul-Ameer), p.17) Based on this formula, some of the future prophets (if at all there are some, and there should be at least three of them if you accept the Qadiani interpretation of the verse of Khatme-Nabuwwat) will have following ages: Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani ??? 30 years old Next assumed prophet 15 years old Next assumed prophet 7 and half years old…and so on. So according to the extract on page 17 taken from "Invitation to Ahamadiyyat", Hazrat Adam (pbuh) should have lived up to 122880 years. Which means that he is still alive. In fact, even Hazrat Sheesh, Noah, Abrahim and Ismail (pbut) should all be alive now. Furthermore, if Mirza Sahib is a prophet, he should have died at the age of 30 only, that is half the age of the previous Prophet. Did Mirza Sahib become Prophet after his death? Still more interesting, if Prophets will continue to come, then just a few Prophets down the line we would be having one who is a newborn!! This statement of the Holy Prophet (SAAW), if at all authentic, clearly means that there will no Prophet after Hazrat Muhammad , because the next Prophet will have to die at the age of 30 and the next at 15 which means he will not even be an adult.

Ma fauq ul bashari kehte hein koi bohot hi special kisim ka aadmi jis mein wo sifaat hoon ke jo aam insaano mein nhai ho sakti..jaysay tumharay mazar walay buzurg..jin mein Allah ki qualaities badarjaha hein..peentare badalna to koi barlvion se seekhe ..pehlay mazar wale log Wali Allah the sirf...Jab bataya to pentara badla ye to humko pata hay..aur ye kam ya ziyada taqwa wali mantaq aap kahan se laye..yani jo kam taqwe ala hoga uski normal qabar banegi aur jo ziyada taqwe wala hoga uska mazar banega..hai bralvi teri aqal..teray pass taqwa naapne ka pemaana bhi hay..woww..aur jo kam emaan wala aur taqwa wala hoga wo noramal wali Allah hay..aur jo ziyada emaan wala aur taqwe wala hoga..usmein Allah ki qualities aa jaingi..wo hazir o nazir bhi ho jaega..aalim ul ghaib bhi ho jaehga..puri kainaat ka mushahida aik hi jagah se karta hoga..mushkil kusha bhi ho jaega.. Aur hum jo dunya mein faislay kar lete hein ye to wali Allah hay shaheed hay falan falan..ye sab zahir he marne wale ka batin kia tha wo qayamat mein khulega..ye hadees parh lo. : On the authority of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) say: The first of people against whom judgment will be pronounced on the Day of Resurrection will be a man who died a martyr. He will be brought and Allah will make known to him His favours and he will recognize them. [ The Almighty] will say: And what did you do about them? He will say: I fought for you until I died a martyr. He will say: You have lied - you did but fight that it might be said [of you]: He is courageous. And so it was said. Then he will be ordered to be dragged along on his face until he is cast into Hell-fire. [Another] will be a man who has studied [religious] knowledge and has taught it and who used to recite the Quran. He will be brought and Allah will make known to his His favours and he will recognize them. [The Almighty] will say: And what did you do about them? He will say: I studied [religious] knowledge and I taught it and I recited the Quran for Your sake. He will say: You have lied - you did but study [religious] knowledge that it might be said [of you]: He is learned. And you recited the Quran that it might be said [of you]: He is a reciter. And so it was said. Then he will be ordered to be dragged along on his face until he is cast into Hell-fire. [Another] will be a man whom Allah had made rich and to whom He had given all kinds of wealth. He will be brought and Allah will make known to his His favours and he will recognize them. [The Almighty] will say: And what did you do about them? He will say: I left no path [untrodden] in which You like money to be spent without spending in it for Your sake. He will say: You have lied - you did but do so that it might be said [of you]: He is open-handed. And so it was said. Then he will be ordered to be dragged along on his face until he is cast into Hell-fire. It was related by Muslim (also by at-Tirmidhi and an-Nasa'i). Allah hi hafiz he tum logon ka.

Shor karne aur uchalne koondne se kuch nahi hota...wahabi deobandi ka rona peetna karke kuch hasil nahi hoga..tum log bhi matam kia karo shia ki tarah..hai wahabi ..hai deobandi..hai hai hai...ro ro rote rahoo..qayamat tak rote raho gay.. Allah ne humko har cheez ki tafseel batai hay..pehlay zara is baat ko samjh lo ke Aulia Allah kis ko kaha hay Allah ne.. أَلاَ إِنَّ أَوْلِيَاءَ اللَّهِ لاَ خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلاَ هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ (يونس: 62). الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَكَانُوا يَتَّقُونَ (يونس: 63). لَهُمُ الْبُشْرَى فِي الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَفِي الآخِرَةِ لاَ تَبْدِيلَ لِكَلِمَاتِ اللَّهِ ذَلِكَ هُوَ الْفَوْزُ الْعَظِيمُ (يونس:64) Is ayat mein Allah ke dost ki 2 nishaanian batai gai hein..(Emaan) aur (Taqwa) aur hum dekhtay hein ke bazahir is ma'yar par bohot saray log hein jo pura utarte hein..beshumar log aesay hein jin mein ye qualities hein..ab zara is ayat ko aik tafseer ke zarye bhi samjh lo ke mufassiron ke nazdeek Wali Allah kon hay.. قوله تعالى: { أَلا إِنَّ أَوْلِيَاء ٱللَّهِ } يعني المؤمنين. ويقال: أحباء الله. وهم حملة القرآن والعلم. ويقال الذين يجتنبون الذنوب في الخلوات ويعلمون أن الله تعالى مطلع عليهم، وروي " عن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - أنه سئل عن أولياء الله تعالى فقال: «هم الذين (إذا رُؤوا) ذُكِرَ اللهُ تعالى " ، وقال وهب بن منبه: [قال] الحواريون لعيسى بن مريم يا روح الله من أولياء الله؟ قال الذين نظروا إلى باطن الدنيا حين نظر الناس إلى ظاهرها. ونظروا إلى آجل الدنيا حين نظر الناس إلى عاجلها فأحيوا ذكر الموت وأماتوا ذكر الحياة ويحبون الله تعالى ويحبون ذكره. وقال الضحاك: { أَلا إِنَّ أَوْلِيَاء ٱللَّهِ } يعني المخلصين لله { لاَ خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ } يعني: لا يخافون من أهوال يوم القيامة { وَلاَ هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ } حين زفرت جهنم، ثم نعتهم فقال تعالى { ٱلَّذِينَ ءامَنُواْ وَكَانُواْ يَتَّقُونَ } يعني أقروا وصدقوا بوحدانية الله تعالى ويتقون الشرك والفواحش { لَهُمُ ٱلْبُشْرَىٰ فِي ٱلْحَيوٰةِ ٱلدُّنْيَا } يعني البشارة وهي الرؤيا الصالحة يراها العبد المسلم لنفسه أو يرى له غيره. وروي عن عبد الله بن عمر عن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - أنه قال: " الرؤيا الصالحة جزء من سبعين جزءاً من النبوة " ، وفي خبر آخر " من أربعين جزءاً " وفي خبر آخر " من ستة وأربعين جزءاً " وروى عطاء بن يسار " عن رجل كان يفتي بالبصرة، قال سألت أبا الدرداء عن هذه الآية { لَهُمُ ٱلْبُشْرَىٰ فِي ٱلْحَيوٰةِ ٱلدُّنْيَا } قال أبو الدرداء ما سألني عنها أحد منذ (سألت عنها رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - ) فقال «ما سألني عنها أحد قبلك. هي الرؤيا الصالحة يراها المسلم أوتُرى له " { وَفِي ٱلاْخِرَةِ } الجنة. وعن عبادة بن الصامت أنه سأل النبي - * تفسير بحر العلوم/ السمرقندي (ت 375 هـ) مصنف و مدقق Saaf tor se is tafseer mein kaha ja raha hay ke Aulia Allah se murad (MOMINEEN) hein..JO Allah se mohabbat kare.. Jo KHILWAT mein gunahon se bachtay hein aur ye jaante hein ke Allah unko dekh raha hay..Rasool Allah se poocha giya ke AULIA ALLAH kon hein to unho ne jawab diya ke jis ko dekh kar Allah yaad aaey..Zahaak kehte hein ke is se muraad (MUKHLISEEN) hein.. mein ne ye choti si detail is liye pesh ki ke Aulia Allah ka mafhoom wazeh ho jaey...agar aap ya koi bhi is ma'ayaar par pura utray ga wo Wali Allah hay.. Mera point ye hay ke is tashreese se ye clear ho giya ke WAli Allah kon log hote hein..Wo nahi hote jo aap logon ne MAFOQULBASHRI banaey hoye hein..Is tarah to ye dunya mazaron se bhar jaegi ..kay yahan to roz is dunya mein bohot saray log Emaan aur Taqway wale marte hein.. Ab is Hadees e Qudsi ka matlab samjh lo..iska koi hawala nahi hay mere pass .. Jab Rasool Allah ke zamane mein koi bhi emaan laata tha wo momineen ki jamaat mein shamil ho jata tha aur jab bhi koi musalman hota to kufaar uske dushman ho jate thay..aur unko aziyat dene lagte thay..Kionke wo momin ho chuka hay aur Rasool Allah par emaan la chuka hay aur wo mukhlis bhi hay..to is ayat ke mutabiq wo Allah ka dost ban giya..Jab Allah ne ye dekha ke mere Rasool par emaan lane walo se dushmani ki jati hay aur usko aziyat di jati hay to Allah ne farmaya ke mera us se elaan e jang hay jo mere WALI se dushmani karega..Aaj bhi agar koi kafir musalman hota hay aur usko koi is baat par eeza deta hay aur us say dushmani karta hay to us say bhi Allah ki jang hay..

Ya Muhammadah sahab ki mantaq parh kar mein hairaan ho giya ke hum log dunya hi mein faisla kar lete hein ke ye wali mara hay aur ye aam aadmi..phir usi hisaab se uski qabar banti hay..agar wo wali hay to pakki mazar wali nahi to katchi gabar banegi ..is liye ke to aam aadmi tha..hum ne yahan hi tera faisla kar liya hay ke tu wali Allah hay aur to aam insaan..wah wah Subhan Allah..yani bralvi ab qayamat se pehlay faislay bhi karne lagay.. ab zara quran ka faisla bhi sun lo..qayamat to shaed Allah ne aesay hi logon ko darane ke liye rakh di hay..faislay to saray hum ne dunya mein kar hi liye..Jiske mazar banane thay bana diye jinki aam qabar banani thi wo bhi kar diya..faisla ho giya.. هَذَا يَوْمُ الْفَصْلِ جَمَعْنَاكُمْ وَالأَوَّلِينَ (المرسلات: 38). { هَـٰذَا يَوْمُ ٱلْفَصْلِ } يعني: يوم القضاء ويقال يوم الفصل يعني بين أهل الجنة وبين أهل النار { جَمَعْنَـٰكُمْ وَٱلأَوَّلِينَ } يعني: جمعناكم يا أمة محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم * تفسير بحر العلوم/ السمرقندي (ت 375 هـ) مصنف و مدقق Is tafseer mein saaf tor se ye bataya ja raha hay ke ahle jannat aur dozakh ka faisla qayamat mein hoga.. Agar tum logon ke pass koi quran o hadees ka hawla hay ke Allah Ta'ala dunya mein Aulia Allah ka faisla kar dete hein to batao..Anbiya aur Ashra Mubasharra jo jannati hein inke ilawa jab Rasool ne kisi ka faisla nahi kia to hum kaysay kar saktay hein.. Ziyada agay nahi barhana chahiye..Allah par sabqat karna sakht gunnah hay.. hum kisi ke baray mein itna zaroor keh saktay hein ke bhala aadmi hay mein ne is mein kabhi koi burai nahi dekhi..magar jannat ka faisla qayamat mein hoga..aur isi tarah hum kisi ke bare mein keh sakte hein ke bohot bura aur badbakht aadmi hay ..magar ..iski jannat ya jahannam ka faisla qayamat mein hoga..Hum Allah par sabqat nahi kar saktay ...

very funny tumharay saamne koi bacha nahi hay.

Sirf aik cheez poochni hay ke agar koi marta hay to humein kaysay pata chalay ke ye aam aadmi tha ya wali Allah tha..takay hum uski qabar phir usi hisaab say bnaein...Thank you

Bhai sahab aap lambi chauri bohot karte ho..mein ne aap se aik baat ye poochi thi ke ..jo aap ne Rasool Allah ko ma fauqul bashar aur bohot hi special qisim ki personality bana diya hay..Allah ke barabar sifaat daydi unko...sawal ye hay kay itni qualities say is ummat ko kia faida hay..Jis maqsad se unko is dunya mein bheja tha Allah ne us kaam mein itni qualities ki kia zaroorat thi..kia kisi pure bashar se ye kaam nahi liya ja sakta tha????aur itni khaas qisim ki qualities rakhne ke bawajoob kufaar ko wo sab nahi dikhaya ja raha hay jiska shadeed taqaza ho raha hay.. وَقَالُواْ مَالِ هَـٰذَاٱلرَّسُولِ يَأْكُلُ ٱلطَّعَامَ وَيَمْشِي فِي ٱلأَسْوَاقِ لَوْلاۤ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْهِ مَلَكٌ فَيَكُونَ مَعَهُ نَذِيراًاًأَوْ يُلْقَىٰإِلَيْهِ كَنْزٌ أَوْ تَكُونُ لَهُ جَنَّةٌ يَأْكُلُ مِنْهَا وَقَالَ ٱلظَّالِمُونَ إِن تَتَّبِعُونَ إِلاَّ رَجُلاً مَّسْحُورo aakhir kufaar ko wo cheezein kion na nazar aain..kion taqaze kar rahay thay ..wo aik SPECIALITY ka..kion unko wo sab dikha kar muh band nahi kar diya..aap ne iska jawab nahi diya.. {Jogi, Budhist sab kertay hen magir Bashriat meh kamzoori hoti heh jism kee hadiyan nazr aa jaati hen, magir RasoolAllah per rozay rakhnay kee waja per kohi farq nahin aya thah, kohi jismani kamzori zahir nahin ho rahi thee. RasoolAllah nay farmaya tha mera rab mujjay khilata pilata heh meray sahabah, sari Hadith ko pero.} Jab khaiber ke moqe par zehrila khana khaya tha to kia unke jisim par farq na para ..kia wo bemaar na pare..kia unki wafaat usi zehreele ghost ki waja se na hoi..??? kia umer ke aakhir hissay mein unka jisim kamzor na para jo Abu Bakar ko namaz parhani pari..kia wo apne jisim mubarak par pichne(JOONK) nahi lagwatay thay..ye sab kia hay..???? قَدْ جَاءكُمْ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ نُورٌ } يعني ضياء من الضلالة وهو محمد - صلى الله عليه وسلم - والقرآن والنور هو الذي يبين الأشياء، ويرى الأبصار حقيقتها، فيسمى القرآن نوراً، لأنه يقع في القلوب مثل النور، لأنه إذا وقع في قلبه يبصر به، ثم قال: { وَكِتَـٰبٌ مُّبِينٌ } يعني القرآن يبين لكم الحق من الباطل. قوله تعالى: { يَهْدِي بِهِ ٱللَّهُ } يعني بالقرآن { مَنِ ٱتَّبَعَ رِضْوَانَهُ } يعني مَنْ طلب الحق ورغب فيه، { سُبُلَ ٱلسَّلَـٰمِ } يعني دين الله الإسلام، والسب * تفسير بحر العلوم/ السمرقندي (ت 375 هـ) مصنف و مدقق noor se is ayat mein kia muraad he mein aik bare mufassir ka hawala diya hay..unho ne noor se muraad wo (GUMRAHI MEIN ROSHNI BAN KAR AAEY .). agar aap ke pass koi authentic daleel he ke is ayat mein noor se murad jismani noor he to please pesh karein.. {* Pehla point, Imam Raazi rahimullah alayhi tallah nay joh likha heh woh toh Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat ka aqeedah heh, kay logo meh Bashr hoon. RasoolAllah Bashr hen, aur jumla Tashbiya be heh, aur jumla Tasbhiyah meh qulli zaat o sifat ke tashbih nahin hoti sirf ek quality kee tashbih hoti heh aur ayaat: " sirf meh hoon Bashariat meh tumari misl." meh tashbih e Bashariat heh, yehni meh sirf Bashariat meh tumari jesa hoon, nabuwat, shahid, Noor, honay meh meri misl tum jesi nahin.} وَقَالُوا لَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لَكَ حَتَّى تَفْجُرَ لَنَا مِنَ الأَرْضِ يَنْبُوعًا (الإسراء: 90). أَوْ تَكُونَ لَكَ جَنَّةٌ مِنْ نَخِيلٍ وَعِنَبٍ فَتُفَجِّرَ الأَنهَارَ خِلاَلَهَا تَفْجِيرًا (الإسراء: 91). أَوْ تُسْقِطَ السَّمَاءَ كَمَا زَعَمْتَ عَلَيْنَا كِسَفًا أَوْ تَأْتِيَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْمَلاَئِكَةِ قَبِيلاً (الإسراء: 92). أَوْ يَكُونَ لَكَ بَيْتٌ مِنْ زُخْرُفٍ أَوْ تَرْقَى فِي السَّمَاءِ وَلَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لِرُقِيِّكَ حَتَّى تُنَزِّلَ عَلَيْنَا كِتَابًا نَقْرَؤُهُ قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي هَلْ كُنتُ إِلاَّ بَشَرًا رَسُولاً (الإسراء: 93) وقوله: { قُلْ سُبْحانَ رَبّـي } يقول تعالـى ذكره لنبـيه مـحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم: قل يا مـحمد لهؤلاء الـمشركين من قومك، القائلـين لك هذه الأقوال، تنزيها لله عما يصفونه به، وتعظيـما له من أن يؤتـى به وملائكته، أو يكون لـي سبـيـل إلـى شيء مـما تسألونـيه: { هَلْ كُنْتُ إلاَّ بَشَرا رَسُولاً } يقول: هل أنا إلاَّ عبد من عبـيده من بنـي آدم، فكيف أقدر أن أفعل ما سألتـمونـي من هذه الأمور، وإنـما يقدر علـيها خالقـي وخالقكم، وإنـما أنا رسول أبلغكم ما أرسلت به إلـيكم، والذي سألتـمونـي أن أفعله بـيد الله الذي أنا وأنتـم عبـيد له، لا يقدر علـى ذلك غيره. تفسير جامع البيان في تفسير القرآن/ الطبري (ت 310 هـ) مصنف و مدقق (Kia mein bani adam ke aur bando ki tarah banda nahi hoon,mein kaysay ye kaam kar sakta hoon jo tum karne ke liye keh rahay ho,is kaam par to mera aur tumhara khaliq hi qadir hay, mein to sirf aik Rasool hoon mein to jo kuch bhi mujh par nazil hota hay wo tum tak pohoncha deta hoon,aur jo karne ko keh rahay ho wo Allah ke haath mein hay,mein aur tum to uskay banday hein aur hum is kaam par qudrat nahi rakhtay) IMAM TIBRI chalo hum to hein hi gustaakh, badmazhab, badaqeeda aur na jane kia kia ....Tumlog Imam Tibri sahab ko to maante hona..Ya ye bhi badmazhab hein..Inho ne to aap ke batil aqeedon ki nafi kardi hay..Jo kuch bhi aap log Rasool Allah ke ikhtiyaraat aur qudrat ke baray mein bayan karte ho aur unko noori aur powerful shakhssiyat kehtay ho..is tafseer mein to zabardast tareke say iski nafi ki gai hay.. قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي } يعني النبيّ صلى الله عليه وسلم؛ أي قال ذلك تنزيهاً لله عز وجل عن أن يعجز عن شيء وعن أن يعترض عليه في فعل. وقيل: هذا كله تعجب عن فرط كفرهم واقتراحاتهم. الباقون «قل» على أمر؛ أي قل لهم يا محمد { هَلْ كُنتُ } أي ما أنا «إلاّ بشراً رسولاً» أتبع ما يوحى إليّ من ربّي، ويفعل الله ما يشاء من هذه الأشياء التي ليست في قدرة البشر، فهلسمعتم أحداً من البشر أتى بهذه الآيات! تفسير الجامع لاحكام القرآن/ القرطبي (ت 671 هـ) مصنف و مدق Imam Qurtubi bhi wohi baat kar rahay hein ke " Rasool ne kaha mein kia hoon..Mein to sirf usi cheez ki ittibah karta hoon jo mujhe wahi ki jati hay, aur jo cheez tum maang rahay ho wo Allah hi kar saktay hein,Aik BASHAR ki qudrat nahi ke wo ye kaam kar sakay jo tum keh rahay ho,is se pehlay kabhi tum ne suna hay ke kisi BASHAR ne is tarah ka kaam kia ho.. IMAM QURTUBI Bilkul clear kaha ja raha hay ke Rasool aam bashar ki tarah aik bashar thay.. Muhammed tum logoon jesa Bashr heh, O Muhammed tum in jesay Bashr ho, (is ibarat ko arbi mein likhein kaysay likha jaega ye??? {Pehlay sabit ker chuka hoon kay Sahabah, Muffasireen nay is ayaat ko tawazoh, inkasari, khaqsari, aajzi, humility kay maffoom meh samja: "Kehdo sirf meh hoon Misl e Bashr tumari jesa." Aur aajzi, inkasari, khaqsari, humility us waqt hoti heh jab khohi khud apnay martbay kee} tawazu inkasari qualities mein hoti hein,structure mein nahi hoti, kon say mufassir aur sahabi ne isko tawaza o inkasari kaha hay.. { قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مّثْلُكُمْ يُوحَىٰ إِلَىَّ } أي لا امتياز بيني وبينكم في شيء من الصفات إلا أن الله تعالى أوحى إلي أنه لا إله إلا الله الواحد الأحد الصمد، * تفسير مفاتيح الغيب ، التفسير الكبير/ الرازي (ت 606 هـ) مصنف و مدقق yahan clear kaha ja raha hay ke mujh mein aur tum mein koi imtiaz nahi hay sirf ye ke mein peghambar hoon mujh par wahi aati hay..kon si aajzi baat aap kar rahay ho..lagta hay saray mufassiron ko aap jaisi garmmer nahi aati thi.. kuch cheezein rah gai hein unka jawab baad mein doonga..office mein hoon..

وَقَالُوا لَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لَكَ حَتَّى تَفْجُرَ لَنَا مِنَ الأَرْضِ يَنْبُوعًا (الإسراء: 90). أَوْ تَكُونَ لَكَ جَنَّةٌ مِنْ نَخِيلٍ وَعِنَبٍ فَتُفَجِّرَ الأَنهَارَ خِلاَلَهَا تَفْجِيرًا (الإسراء: 91). أَوْ تُسْقِطَ السَّمَاءَ كَمَا زَعَمْتَ عَلَيْنَا كِسَفًا أَوْ تَأْتِيَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْمَلاَئِكَةِ قَبِيلاً (الإسراء: 92). أَوْ يَكُونَ لَكَ بَيْتٌ مِنْ زُخْرُفٍ أَوْ تَرْقَى فِي السَّمَاءِ وَلَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لِرُقِيِّكَ حَتَّى تُنَزِّلَ عَلَيْنَا كِتَابًا نَقْرَؤُهُ قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي هَلْ كُنتُ إِلاَّ بَشَرًا رَسُولاً (الإسراء: 93) وقوله: { قُلْ سُبْحانَ رَبّـي } يقول تعالـى ذكره لنبـيه مـحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم: قل يا مـحمد لهؤلاء الـمشركين من قومك، القائلـين لك هذه الأقوال، تنزيها لله عما يصفونه به، وتعظيـما له من أن يؤتـى به وملائكته، أو يكون لـي سبـيـل إلـى شيء مـما تسألونـيه: { هَلْ كُنْتُ إلاَّ بَشَرا رَسُولاً } يقول: هل أنا إلاَّ عبد من عبـيده من بنـي آدم، فكيف أقدر أن أفعل ما سألتـمونـي من هذه الأمور، وإنـما يقدر علـيها خالقـي وخالقكم، وإنـما أنا رسول أبلغكم ما أرسلت به إلـيكم، والذي سألتـمونـي أن أفعله بـيد الله الذي أنا وأنتـم عبـيد له، لا يقدر علـى ذلك غيره. تفسير جامع البيان في تفسير القرآن/ الطبري (ت 310 هـ) مصنف و مدقق (Kia mein bani adam ke aur bando ki tarah banda nahi hoon,mein kaysay ye kaam kar sakta hoon jo tum karne ke liye keh rahay ho,is kaam par to mera aur tumhara khaliq hi qadir hay, mein to sirf aik Rasool hoon mein to jo kuch bhi mujh par nazil hota hay wo tum tak pohoncha deta hoon,aur jo karne ko keh rahay ho wo Allah ke haath mein hay,mein aur tum to uskay banday hein aur hum is kaam par qudrat nahi rakhtay) IMAM TIBRI chalo hum to hein hi gustaakh, badmazhab, badaqeeda aur na jane kia kia ....Tumlog Imam Tibri sahab ko to naamte hona..Ya ye bhi badmazhab hein..Inho ne to aap ke batil aqeedon ki nafi kardi hay..Jo kuch bhi aap log Rasool Allah ke ikhtiyaraat aur qudrat ke baray mein bayan karte ho aur unko noori aur powerful shakhssiyat kehtay ho..is tafseer mein to zabardast tareke say iski nafi ki gai hay.. قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي } يعني النبيّ صلى الله عليه وسلم؛ أي قال ذلك تنزيهاً لله عز وجل عن أن يعجز عن شيء وعن أن يعترض عليه في فعل. وقيل: هذا كله تعجب عن فرط كفرهم واقتراحاتهم. الباقون «قل» على أمر؛ أي قل لهم يا محمد { هَلْ كُنتُ } أي ما أنا «إلاّ بشراً رسولاً» أتبع ما يوحى إليّ من ربّي، ويفعل الله ما يشاء من هذه الأشياء التي ليست في قدرة البشر، فهلسمعتم أحداً من البشر أتى بهذه الآيات! تفسير الجامع لاحكام القرآن/ القرطبي (ت 671 هـ) مصنف و مدقق Imam Qurtubi bhi wohi baat kar rahay hein ke " Rasool ne kaha mein kia hoon..Mein to sirf usi cheez ki ittibah karta hoon jo mujhe wahi ki jati hay, aur jo cheez tum maang rahay ho wo Allah hi kar saktay hein,Aik BASHAR ki qudrat nahi ke wo ye kaam kar sakay jo tum keh rahay ho,is se pehlay kabhi tum ne suna hay ke kisi BASHAR ne is tarah ka kaam kia ho.. IMAM QURTUBI Bilkul clear kaha ja raha hay ke Rasool aam bashar ki tarah aik bashar thay..ab tum log mano ya na mano..ya phir in mufassiron ko jhutla do..Ab in mufassiron par fatwa lagado..Kafir..badmazhab..gustaakh..wahabi..deobandi..pata nahi kia kia..

Shukar hay tum ne tameez se baat to ki .. Tum ajeeb aadmi ho aik taraf to iqraar kar rahay ho ke ye tafaseer sahi hein..to mere bhai..Imam Razi saaf tor se keh rahay hein ke ...aaey logon mujh mein aur tum mein koi IMTIAZ nahi hay bashriat ki sifaat mein..sirf ye fazilat hay mujh ko tum par ke mein Allah ka peghamber hoon mujh par wahi aati hay..to kia aap ki logic inko kion na samjh mein i.. yahi baat baqi dono mufassiron ne kahi hay..jab wo Nabi jismani bashar maan rahay hein to aap kion logic pesh kar rahay ho..unko ye logic ziyada pata honi cha hiye thi na.. Aur sab se bari baat to ye hay ke jo sifaat aap log Rasool mein sabit karna chah rahay ho..hum aur tum to sirf unko parhatay hein..kufaar to barah e raast mushhida kar rhay thay..to wo kion kehtay thay Nabi ko ke tum aik aam insaan ho..hum tum par emaan nahi laingay..aur tumharay sath to khazanay hone chahiye ..aur hum apne par tumhari koi fazilat bhi nahi dekhte.. وَقَالُواْ مَالِ هَـٰذَاٱلرَّسُولِ يَأْكُلُ ٱلطَّعَامَ وَيَمْشِي فِي ٱلأَسْوَاقِ لَوْلاۤ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْهِ مَلَكٌ فَيَكُونَ مَعَهُ نَذِيراًo اًأَوْ يُلْقَىٰإِلَيْهِ كَنْزٌ أَوْ تَكُونُ لَهُ جَنَّةٌ يَأْكُلُ مِنْهَا وَقَالَ ٱلظَّالِمُونَ إِن تَتَّبِعُونَ إِلاَّ رَجُلاً مَّسْحُور Jo mafoqul bashri Rasool Allah ki aap biyaan karte ho..in kuffar ko jo barah e raast unka mushahida kar rahay thay..unko kion na nazar i ye baat. Aur sab se barh kar khud Rasool jo inki hidayat ke liye puri puri raat rote thay ..kion in kuffaar se na kaha aao dekho mere khazane..dekho mera saya nahi hay..dekho mere jisim se kaysa noor nikalta hay..aao mein tumko wo sab kuch dikhata hoon jo tum aik special insaan mein dekhna chahatay ho..mein sarapa noor hoon..kion aesa hoa ke Rasool Allah ki wo qualities jo aap log bayan karte ho ..kion Rasool Allah ne un kuffaar ko dikha kar unka muh kion band nahi kar diya.. aur rahi baat bukhari ki hadees (ke kon meri misil hay) isko aap samjh lo..Rasool Allah ne jo sahaba ko kaha ke kon meri tarah hay..unka maqsad unko itne mujahide se rokna tha..ke tum mein itni taaqat nahi hay..iski misaal yun samjho..Aik bohot taqatwar aadmi bohot bhari wazan uthata hay aur us mein us wazan uthane ki salahiyat hay is liye wo utha raha hay..magar agar wohi wazan koi kamzor aam sa banda uthaega to uski kamar zaroor jaegi..to taqatwar aadmi bolega ..bhai to mujh jaysa nahi hay..to na utha ye wazan..iska ye matlab nahi hay kay wo kamzor aadmi kuch aur hi zaat ka hay aur taqatwar aadmi kuch aur hi zaat ka hay.. Dunya mein bohot saray mazahib ke log hein..unke mazhab mein bare bare ajeeb mujahide hein..koi un mujahidon ke karne ka soch hi nahi sakta..BUDHIST..HINDU JOGI..SAADHU AUR PATA NAHI KAYSAY KAYSAY LOG HEIN JO MA FAUQ UL BASHRI MUJAHIDE KARTE HEIN JINKO KOI NAHI KAR SAKTA..ISKA YE MATLAB NAHI HAY KE WO INSAAN NAHI HEIN KOI NOORI MAKHLOOQ HEIN.. BILKUL YAHI TASHREE BUKHARI KI HADEES KI HAY..(AYYUKUM MISLI) AUR JANNAT AUR DOOZAKH DEKHNA ANBIYA KA MUJZA HOTA HAY YAHI CHEEZ UNKO AAM AADMI SE MUMTAZ KARTI HAY..

Tumhari itni fazool batein parh li ..is baat par bhi apni mantaq pesh karo..ke Hazrat Ibn Abbas ne kion Jirael ko bashar nahi balkay ..SHABIH kaha.. Aur tum ne aik bhi daleel aesi nahi pesh ki ke farishtay ne libas e basharyat mein koi bashar wala kaam kia ho..jokay bashri taqzay hote hein..kionke zaat badalti hay to fitrat bhi badal jati hay..aur aik tafseer pesh kar raha hoon..ab mujhe ye nahi pata ke Imam Razi ko ROOT WORD ka pata tha ya nahi. قُلْ إِنَّمَآ أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مِّثْلُكُمْ يُوحَىٰ إِلَيَّ أَنَّمَآ إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ فَمَن كَانَ يَرْجُواْ لِقَآءَ رَبِّهِ فَلْيَعْمَلْ عَمَلاً صَالِحاً وَلاَ يُشْرِكْ بِعِبَادَةِ رَبِّهِ أَحَدَاً } أي لا امتياز بيني وبينكم في شيء من الصفات إلا أن الله تعالى أوحى إلي أنه لا إله إلا الله الواحد الأحد الصمد، والآية تدل على مطلوبين: الأول: أن كلمة { إِنَّمَا } تفيد الحصر وهي قوله: { أَنَّمَا إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وٰحِدٌ }. والثاني: أن كون الإله تعالى: *تفسير مفاتيح الغيب ، التفسير الكبير/ الرازي (ت 606 هـ) مصنف و مدقق aik aur tafseer mulahiza ho { قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مّثْلُكُمْ } أي: إن حالي مقصور على البشرية لا يتخطاها إلى الملكية، ومن كان هكذا فهو لا يدّعي الإحاطة بكلمات ال له إلا أنه امتاز عنهم بالوحي إليه من الله سبحانه فقال: { يُوحَىٰ إِلَىَّ } وكفى بهذا الوصف فارقاً بينه وبين سائر أنواع البشر، ثم بيّن أن الذي أوحى إليه هو قوله: { أَنَّمَا إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وٰحِدٌ } لا شريك له في ألوهيته، وفي هذا إرشاد إلى التوحيد، ثم أمرهم بالعمل الصالح والتوحيد فقال: * تفسير فتح القدير/ الشوكاني (ت 1250 هـ) مصنف و مدقق قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مّثْلُكُمْ } لا أدعي الإِحاطة على كلماته. { يُوحَىٰ إِلَىَّ أَنَّمَا إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ } وإنما تميزت عنكم بذلك. { فَمَن كَانَ يَرْجُو لِقَاء رَبّهِ } يؤمل حسن لقائه أو يخاف سوء لقائه. { فَلْيَعْمَلْ عَمَلاً صَـٰلِحاً } يرتضيه الله. { وَلاَ يُشْرِكْ بِعِبَادَةِ رَبّهِ أَحَدَا } بأن يرائيه أو يطلب منه أجراً * تفسير انوار التنزيل واسرار التأويل/ البيضاوي (ت 791 هـ) مصنف و مدقق. ye tafaseer aaplogonki ke har dil aziz hay jinpar par aap log dil o jaan nichawar karte hein..wo khud kia keh rahay hein..mulahiza karlo..SHAED IMAM RAZI AUR DOOSRE MUFFASIR TUM SAY ZIYADA ARBI GRAMMER JAANTE HEIN..YA TO INKO ROOT WORD AATA HI NAHI.. IN TAMAAM MUFASSIR NE AIK HI BAAT KAHI HAY KE RASOOL MEIN AUR DOOSRE INSANO MEIN SIFAAT E BASHRI KE LIHAZ SE KOI FARQ NAHI..FAZILAT SIRF YE HAY KE WO PEGHAMBER HEIN UNPAR WAHI AATI HAY.. detail mein jawab mein fursat mein doonga kionke office mein beth kar sari debate karta hoon.. rahi baat KUTTO ki ye mat bolo mujhe please, mujh par case ho jaega.. kionke KUTTON wali sifaat ke saray copy rights aap ki dawat e islami ke pass hein.. baqi jawab fursat mein abhi kuch masroofiat hay..

tum log apni mantaq bazi se baaz nahi aaogay.. * Surah Al Kahf {18} Verse 110: "Tum farmaho! Zahir soorat Bashri meh toh meh tum jesa hoon, mujjay wahi aati heh kay tumara ma'bood ek hee heh ..." yahi baat isi tarah se Allah ne kion na kehdi kion aesi baat kari jis par ummat larai kare.. turjuma ko turjuma hi rehne dena chahiye..hamare ghar ki kitaab nahi hay jo chahay tehreef kardi..(Zahir soorat Bashri) kis lafz ka turjuma hay..ya apni dimaghi ikhtara hay..Ahmed Raza ne quran mein tehreef ke siwa kia kia hay? Allah farmate hein ke ye quran seedhi baat karta hay..to khud faisla karo..Allah ne to ye seedhi baat na ki..parho kuch matlab kuch.. aur quran ke alfaaz ma'aniat rekhte hein aik lafz bhi quran mein faltu nahi hay..isko apni dunyawi language aur misalon se tashbie na do..(MISTUKUM) ahmiat rakhta hay quran mein..

Tum mein kitna ilm hay ..ye tumhari guftugo ke andaaz se pata chalta hay..jisko uske ilm ne baat karna nahi sikhaya khali apni barai maarna deengay maarna..is say pata chal raha hay konsa sa ilm hasil kia hay aur kis say hasil kia hay..bas apne muh mian mitthhu banne ka shok hota hay kuch logon ko ..zabardasti apne jahilnana ilm ka sikka bethana chahatay hein..deobandion mein ..wahabion mein tumhari daal nahi gali..tum ne socha yahi aik firqa hay sufion wala ..har ulti seedhi baat par Subhan Allah..Masha Allah..bas tum bralvi ban gaey aur ..in andho mein kaane raja ban gaey..aur ye tumhari wah wah karte hein aur tum khush hotay rehtay ho..chalo Allah tumko aesi aur khusian day.. Aap ke ittilah keay liye arz hay ke ye samjh lo ke MOAJZAY AUR JADOO mein kia farq hay.. jadoo mein jadogar jab kisi cheez ki shakal badal deta hay..to haqeeqat mein wo shakal nahi badalti balkay nazarbandi kar deta hay wo logonki aankh mein..asal mein haqeeqat mein cheez wohi hoti hay..magar nazar kuch aur aati hay..uski misaal yun samjho Moosa ke saamne wohi jadugar jo thori der pehlay firaon ki azmat ke geet ga rahay thay..magar jab unho ne AZDAHA dekha to wohi log sajde mein gir gaey aur firaon jaysay shakhs ko jawab day diya kay jo kar saktay ho tum sirf is dunya mein..magar ab hum eeman nahi chor saktay..sochne ki baat hay jadugar ko aesi kia cheez nazar aagai..to meray bhai..baat ye thi jadugaron ne jo rassian pheki thi wo dekhne walon ko saanp nazar aarahay thay magar wo haqeeqat mein rassi hi thi..nazar bandi ki gai thi..magar Moosa ne jo apna ASSA pheka tha wo haqeeqat mein AZDAHA ban giya tha..jis baat ko sirf jadugar hi samjh sakay..jab haqeeqat mein azdaha ban giya to uski fitrat bhi badal gai.. Magar meray jahil dost farishtay jab bhi is dunya mein aain hein bashar ban kar ..unho ne sirf bashar ki shabih ikhtiar ki hoi hoti hay magar wo apni asliat ke lihaz say farishaty hi hotay hein.. Iski misaal ye hay... فَٱتَّخَذَتْ مِن دُونِهِم حِجَاباً فَأَرْسَلْنَآ إِلَيْهَآ رُوحَنَا فَتَمَثَّلَ لَهَا بَشَراً سَوِيّاً َأَرْسَلْنَآ إِلَيْهَآ } بعد ما فرغت { رُوحَنَا } رسولنا جبريل { فَتَمَثَّلَ لَهَا } فتشبه لها { بَشَراً سَوِيّاً } في صورة شاب لم ينقص { قَالَتْ } مريم { إِنِّيۤ أَعُوذُ } أمتنع { بِٱلرَّحْمَـٰنِ مِنكَ إِن كُنتَ تَقِيّاً } مطيعاً للرحمن ويقال التقي كان اسم رجل سوء فظنت أنه هو ذلك الرجل فمن ذلك تعوذت منه { قَالَ } لها جبريل { إِنَّمَآ أَنَاْ رَسُولُ رَبِّكِ لأَهَبَ لَكِ } ً * تفسير تفسير القرآن/ الفيروز آبادي (ت817 هـ) مصنف و مدقق Is tafseer Ibn Abbas mein Hazrat Ibn Abbas saaf tor say iski tafseer mein keh rahay hein kay Jibrael soorat bashri ki sirf TASHBEEH thay unki sirf soorat thi bashar ki..wo koi asli ke bashar nahi ban kar aaey thay.. Agar thori si bhi aqal ho na tum mein to ye baat kafi hay isko samjhne ke liye..mein hargiz tumko qail nahi karna chaha raha hoon..mujhe pata hay tumko aakhir mein phir deengay maarni hay.. Rahi baat Hazrat Ibrahim ke pass jo farishtay aaey thay....wo bhi bashar ke roop mein farishtay thay..libas bashar ka tha..jis tarah Jibrael Maryam ke pass aaey bilkul isi tarah wo farishtay bhi bashar ki shabih mein thay magar haqeeqat mein thay farishtay hi.. TUM MUJHAY YE SABIT KARDO KAY FARISHTAY HAQEEQAT MEIN BASHAR BAN KAR AATAY THAY..mein ne to daleel pesh kardi kay wo shabih ban kar aatay thay haqeeqat mein nahi..QURAN O HADEES SAY..tumhari mantaq nahi..kisi daleel say jo quran o hadees ki ho.... aur tum say aik sawal ye hay ke jis trah se TUMLOGON ne Rasool Allah ko ma fauq ul bashar aur na jane intahai intahai special qisim ki makhlooq banaya hay..YANI RAB KE BARABAR SIFAAT DAYDI....to sawal ye hay ke Allah Ta'ala ko peghambari ke kaam ke liye is tarah ki personality ki zaroorat kion pari..inki is mafauq ul bashari aur speciality se ummat ko kia faida dayna cha rahay hein Allah ??? kai kisi pure bashar say Allah ka kaam nahi ho sakta tha...???

ISKO BOLTAY HEIN LAJAWAB... JAB JAWAB NAHI TO YE LAO WO LAO........

jab aadmi ke pass jawab nahi hota to yumhi keh deta hay ke mein ne radd kar diya..tum kia tumharay baray bhi us post ka jawab nahi day sakte..us mein pakki pakki sahih ahadees say daleel pesh ki gai hay..tumharay sufia ke aqwal wali daleel nahi hay..pehlay puri tarah perh tawajja say ..magar bralviat ka chasma utaar ka parhana phir samjh aega warna yumhi aai baiin karte raho ge apni fazool qabliat ke jhande lehratay raho gay..isko boltay hein apne muh mian mitthho

Aap ne jitni bhi mislein dein hein ke Farishtay bashar ke roop mein aatay thay..isi baat ko bunyad bana kar aap logon ko bewaqoof bana rahay hein ke dekho wo bhi to 2 roop mein thay isi tarah Rasool Allah ke bhi 2 roop hein.. magar mere bhai farishtay waqt e zaroorat bashar ke roop mein aaey zaroor hein magar unho ne kabhi wo kaam nahi kia jo bashar ke taqazay hotay hein..kionke ye unki fitrat ke khilaf tha.. iski chooti si misaal ke Ibrahim ke pass farishtay bashar ke roop mein aaey aur Ibrahim ne unke liye foran bhuna howa bachra pesh kia..magar unho ne khnay se inkaar kar diya ke hum farishtay hein..ye hoti hay fitrat.. magar Rasool Allah ne har wo kaam kiya jo aik bashar ke taqazay hote hein..unho ne shadi ki..bachay peda hoay..khana khatay thay..pani peetay thay..bazaron mein chaltay phirtay thay..unke jisim se aam aadmion tarah khoon nikalta tha..pkhana peshab karte thay..istinja karte thay..chotein khai..zakham khaey..gharz beshumar koi cheez aesi na thi jo unho ne na ki..karte kion nahi ..yahi unki fitrat thi..agar wo koi noorani aur ma fauqal bashar hotay to kabhi ye kaam na karte..jis tarah Ibrahim ke pass ana wale farishto ne na ki..aur jis kaam ke liye unko duya mein allah ne bheja ...uskay liye to phir kisi pure bashar ko bhi allah ta'ala nabi bana kar bhej detye...kion itni sifaat wala ..Allah ki qualities wala peghamber bheja ..kia iski koiwaja thi..magar kufaar hamesha yahi kehtay thay..tum to aik bashar ho aur tumhari to hum koi fazilat nahi dekhte ..jo kuch tum bayan karte ho kia kuffar ko nahi nazar i ye siffat ..to wo kion peghamber aam aadmi bolte thay... zara hosh karo..Allah se hidayat maango..asal mein tum log quarn o hadees ko parhtay hi apne akabir ka chasma lagakr ...

zabardasti ka to koi ilaaj nahi hay..baat ye hay ke pehlay aap ke toheedi bhai bohot israar kar rahay thay is daleel par ke Moosa qabar mein namaz parh rahay thay..isi tarah wo aur doosre bohot se anbiya bait ul maqdas mein namaz parh rahay thay us raat..to jab aap qabar mein moosa ko is daleel ki bunyad par zinda maan rahay ho to saray anbiya ko bait ul maqdas mein bhi zinda mano..un sabko wahan par dekha tha.. baat ye hay ke mairaaj ka waqiya pura ka pura mujza hay..aur mujza aqal se mawara hota hay..is liye mujze ki kisi baat ko aam zindagi ke liye daleel nahi banaya ja sakta.. Asal qabristan barsakh mein hay..ye nahi jo aap samjh rahay hein chahay wo anbiya hoon ya aam aadmi..marne ke baad khatam is duya ka connection.. meri ye post parh lijye ga http://www.islamimehfil.info/index.php?s=&...ost&p=52104

Radiatiing sahab aap ke toheedi bhai ke mutabiq muslim ki hadees mein hay hadees ke moosa ko Rasool Allah ne qabar mein namaz parhate hoe dekha..aap logon ka to kaam ho gia mil gai bhie daleel qabar ki zindagi ki..bohot israar kar rahay hein toheedi bhai jisim hay ke rooh he batao na kon namaz parhata hay..toheedi sahab ka israar bohot barh raha hay... to mere bhai agar aap is qabar wali hadees se qabar mein moosa ki zindagi sabit kar rahay ho to usi Sahih Muslim ki aik aur riwayat hay....is mein to ye bhi likha hay ke jab mein bait ul maqdas pohoncha to wahan Ibrahim Essa And Wohi Moosa jinko abhi thori der pehlay qabar mein namaz parhata chor kar aaey thay ab wo bait ul maqdas mein namaz parh rahay hein.. To mere radiating bhai aur toheedi bhai aap log aakhir kion bazid hein ke Moosa qabar mein zinda hein..is riwayat ko pakar kar..to bhaionye Anbiya to bait ul maqdas mein bhi namaz parh rahay thay wahan unki zindagi kion sabit nahi karte..Essa to aasman par zinda hein ..magar is riwayat se aap logonke ke dimaagh ke mutabiq unko bait ul maqdas mein zinda mano..kionke inko bhi dekha tha aur Ibrahim ko bhi dekha tha..balkay is zabardast mantaq se to saray Anbiya ko bait ul maqdas mein zinda manna parega..magar qabar parasto ka kaam to aik hi hadees se chal giya becharon ko doosri riwayat nazar hi na i...hai bralvi tum logon ki aqal par matam ke siwa kia kia ja sakta hay.. wo riwayat mulahiza karein (4) It is narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: I found myself in Hijr and the Quraish were asking me about my might journey. I was asked about things pertaining to Bait-ul-Maqdis which I could not preserve (in my mind). I was very much vexed, so vexed as I had never been before. Then Allah raised it (Bait-ul-Maqdis) before my eyes. I looked towards it, and I gave them the information about whatever they questioned me I also saw myself among the group of apostles. I saw moses saying prayer and found him to be a well-built man as if he was a man of the tribe of Shanu'a. I saw Jesus son of Mary (peace be upon him) offering prayer, of all of men he had the closest resemblance with 'Urwa b. Masu'd al-Thaqafi. I saw Ibrahim (peace be upon him) offering prayer; he had the closest resemblance with your companion (the Prophet himself) amongst people. When the time of prayer came I led them. When I completed the prayer, someone said: Here is Malik, the keeper of the Hell; pay him salutations. I turned to him, but he preceded me in salutation. (Book #001, Hadith #0328)

tum logon mein agar aqal hoti to ye mushriko wala kaslak ikhtiar na karte... saaf saaf hadees dikha raha hoon..musnad ahmed ki ke Rasool Allah Hazrat Ali ko apne baad khlifa nominate kar rahay hein..jahil itni si baat samjh nahi aati ....isi baat ka to jawab maang raha hoon..kai ye riwayat sahi hay..isi baat mein tumhari tamaam baton ka jawab hay..aqal choti hay balke hay hi nahi..tumhara qusoor nahi hay..jo baron ne sikha diya bas wohi sahih hay..

mein sahi to kehta hoon ke tum log doosron ki baat ko nahi sunte sirf apna gana gate ho...post ke end mein arabic ibarat likhi hay musnad ahmed ke hawale say ...jahillllll

Azad Umeedwar sahab bare adab se aik baat poochna chahata hoon..sirf apni maaloomat ke liye.. karbala ka waqiya aik qayamat se kam nahi tha..ajab nafsa nafsi ka alam tha..har aankh ro rahi thi..zulm ki intaha ho rahi thi.. poochna ye hay kay ..itni bari pareshani ke aalam mein bhi kon tha jo itni detail se wo sari karawai word to word likh raha tha..jis tarah aap logonki majlis mein bayan ki jati hay..

Meray khyal se toheedi sahab school teacher hein sawal bohot karte hein..jawab bhi daydo phir bhi wohi sawal karte hein..inka kaam sirf aik hay logonko ko masle mein uljhana usko becheeda banana..seedhi saadhi baat ko tool dena..

aap ne tafseer se sabit kia kay Rasool Allah noor thay lekin wo kon se noor thay... HIDAYAT KE NOOR THAY..YA JISMANI NOOR THAY YE TO BATAO NA..TUMHARI TAFSEER YE KAHIN NAHI LIKHA HAY MAGAR MEIN TUMKO TAFSEER SAY SABIT KAR SAKTA HOON KE IS AYAT MEIN UNKO HIDAYAT KA NOOR KAHA GIYA HAY..