Jump to content

Ahlussunnah

اراکین
  • کل پوسٹس

    1
  • تاریخِ رجسٹریشن

  • آخری تشریف آوری

About Ahlussunnah

Ahlussunnah's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

کمیونٹی میں شہرت

  1. Fadl e Haqq Khairabadi was of heretic views. He wrote some works against 'Imam 'Ahlussunnah 'Ash-Shah 'Isma'i:l Shahi:d RH:. Although it is controversial weather the works of Fadl H:aqq are Corrupted [Tah:rif] of are conserved [Mahfiz:]. I have read two books :- 1] Tahqiq 'Al Fatwa Fi 'Ibt:a:l 'Ahl 'At:t:agh:wa . 2] 'Imtina'Un Naz:ir. Both of these books use abusive and arressive languages against the Great 'Imam of 'Ahlussunnah , 'Ash-Sha:h 'Isma'i:l Shahi:d. Takfi:r and Tafsi:q is also embedded in these two books. https://issuu.com/alimkanwalimtinaa/docs/the_alleged_participation_.docx So those who doubt that Fadl e H:aqq was not against 'Imam Shahi:d RH: may read these two works cited above before making a final decision. How ever there are some points which makes doubts in these two works. Fadl Haqq died in 1861 CE in Islands of Andaman . The book 'Imtina 'An Naz:ir was first published in some year between 1902 CE and i910 CE. So there is a possibility of corruption and manipulation in the text. Any How the present text of the book is in Persian. The book named Tah:qi:q Al Fatwa was published much latter. One may see a scholarly work on the credibility and incredibility of these two works. https://www.scribd.com/document/306014853/Imtina-Un-Nazeer-Tardeed https://issuu.com/ahlussunnahvaljamaah/docs/google.docx But one thing is clear. Fazl e Haqq was not a Barailvi , yet Barailvis try to include him in there latter founded sect. So if the works are assumed to be conserved and credible then one has no option but to accept that Fazl e Haqq was a Heretic who was the first person in Subcontinent who attempted to prove that he Nazir of Holy Prophet is Muhal Bizzat. Alsodeclared that to speak a false sentence is MuhalBizzat. Fadl Haqq not only disputed but also declared 'Iman 'Ahlussunnah 'Shah Shahi:d as Bid'ati or Kafir. Coming back to the other option if these works are manipulated and incredible then he was just an opponent . So this is an open field. https://issuu.com/ahlussunnahvaljamaah/docs/ahlussunnah_waljama.docx_cdb3f12a288ed7 I personally think that Fazl Haqq finally revertedo the beliefs of Imam Shahid before his death , but 'Abdul H:aqq his son rejected his reversion and deliberately hide his reversion.
×
×
  • Create New...