Abdullah Yusuf

Sunni kitabon se tehreef e Quran ka akida Shia k ilzamat Tafseer dur e mansoor Muwatta imam malik itiqan ulum ul quran imam jalalud din sayuti Fatah al Bari, Volume 8 page 742, kitab al tafseer Tafseer Dur al Manthur, Volume 6 page 416 Tafseer Ibn Kathir, Volume 4 page 571 Tafseer Qurtubi, Volume 2 page 251 Tafseer Ruh al Mani, Volume 1 page 279 Sharah Mawafiq, page 679 Al Itqan fi Uloom al Quran, Volume 1 page 99 Tafseer Ibn Kathir, Volume 1 page 9 Tafseer Fatah al Qadeer, Volume 1 page 6 by Allamah Shokani Tafseer al-Kabeer, Volume 1 page 218 Tafseer Gharaib al Quran, Volume 2 page 57 Tafseer Kabeer, Volume 4 page 294 Tafseer Ibn Kathir, Volume 3 page 331 Tafseer Mazhari, Volume 4 page 32 Tafseer Mualam al Tanzeel, Volume 3 page 410 Tafseer Khazin, Volume 3 page 46 Tafseer Ruh al Mani, Volume 9 page 41 In Tafaseeron main or in Tamam sunni kitabon main tehreef e quran ka zikar (SHIA ILZAMAT ON AHLE SUNNAT)

Kuch Shia ne mil kr social media per or facebook pages per sunni books se yeh hadees or riwayaten naqal keen hain Jin main sunni mufasireen or sunni kitabon main quran ko badal diya gya (Nouzubillah) aesa likha hai Quran k ander surah Ahzab ki bohat sari ayaten gum gayen theen yeh ilzam lgaya hai or Quran k ander tabdeeliyan kr dee gayen theen Nouzubillah yeh ilzamat lgaye gaye hain Ahle sunnat per In ka jawab inayat kren Abdullah b. `Umar reportedly said, 'Let none of you say, "I have got the whole of the Qur'an." How does he know what all of it is? MUCH OF THE QUR'AN HAS GONE. Let him say instead, "I have got what has survived."' (Jalal al Din `Abdul Rahman b. Abi Bakr al Suyuti, al-Itqan fi `ulum al-Qur'an, Halabi, Cairo, 1935/1354, Volume 2, p. 25) Imam jalalud din sayuti ki kitab al-Itqan jild 2 page 25 per likha hai Hazrat umar ka qol k koi aesa mat kahe k usey quran aata hai kyunki bohat sa quran gum chuka hai (Aitraz) Zirr ibn Hubaish reported: "Ubayy ibn Ka'b said to me, 'What is the extent of Suratul-Ahzab?' I said, 'Seventy, or seventy-three verses'. He said, 'Yet it used to be equal to Suratul-Baqarah and in it we recited the verse of stoning'. I said, 'And what is the verse of stoning'? He replied, 'The fornicators among the married men (ash-shaikh) and married women (ash-shaikhah), stone them as an exemplary punishment from Allah, and Allah is Mighty and Wise."' (As-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.524).Imam jalalud din sayuti ki kitab jis main zikar hai k surah ahzab surah baqra jitni lambi thee (Aitraz) Ubayy bin Ka'b asked the people around him, "How many verses do you count in Surah Ahzab (The 33rd Surah of the Quran)?" They replied, "72 or 73 verses." Ubayy said to them, "Surah Ahzab used to contain the same number of verses as Surah Baqarah (over 280 verses) or more. We used to recite a verse from Surah Ahzab, 'When a muhsan male and female commit adultery, then stone them both as a deterrent [punishment] from Allah.'" (An-Nasai and Abdullah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal both have narrated this hadith. Hafiz ibn Hajar has classified this as a hasan hadith (Muwafaqatu Al-Khubr Al-Khabr - vol. 2, pg. 304.)). "Ibn Mardawayh reported that Hudhayfah said: 'Umar said to me 'How many verses are contained in the chapter of al-Ahzab?' I said, '72 or 73 verses.' He said it was almost as long as the chapter of the Cow, and in it was the verse of stoning." (Cited In: Durr Al-Manthur, 5/180 & Shawkani's Tafsir: Fath Al-Qadeer Surah ahzab k ander 200 se zyada ayat gum ho chuki (Aitraz) Yeh aitrazat hain in k jawabat jald az jald inayat kren or meri request hai moderators se bhi or tamam logon se k hum itna dhyaan dete hain wahabiyon or deobandiyon k radd main humain is cheez per bhi dhyaan dena chahiye jo log ISLAM K KHILAF propoganda kr rahe hain kitne log is tarhan ki cheezen parh kr aaj gumrah ho rahe hain bache bichare school jate hain college jate hain aesi cheezen sun kr gumrah ho jate hain social media in cheezon se bhara para hai MERI REQUEST HAI MODERATORS OR SAB SE K PLEASE IN PER DHYAAN DEN IN CHEEzon KO AHMIYET DEN WARNA WOH DIN DOOR NAHI JAB KOI SCHOLAR KOI ULAMA KARAM NAHI BACHEN GE OR LOG FITNA FASAD KREN GE JAISE K HADEES HAI K DEEN MAIN ITNI GHALAT FEHMIYAN AA JAYEN GE PLZ IS PER GHOR KREN IN CHEEZON PER GHOR KRNA LAzmi HAI I REQUEST ALL OF YOU APNE MUSLIMS KO GUMRAH HONE SE BACHAYEN

Is ayat Quran e Kareem se yeh tau sabit ho gya hai k londiyan bhi halaal hain lekin is per yeh aitrazat hain K Allah Tala ne londiyon k sath hum bistri ki ijazat kyun dee is ki kya wajoohat theen? Allah Tala ne londiyon ko halaal kyun keh diya or un se hum bistri or un ko bechne ki ijazat kyun dee jab k hum bistri ki ijazat tau sirf biwi ka haq hona chahiye Nabi kareem ne Azal ki ijazat kyun dee Azal matlab Coitus interrupt ki ijazat Sahaba Karam ko kyun dee k woh londiyon k sath hum bistri kren jab k yeh haq sirf biwi ka hona chahiye in ki kya wajoohat theen in sab ka kya sabab tha ? YEH SAWALAT AITRAZAT AYE HAIN IN K JAWABAT ZAROOR INAYAT FARMAYEN

Bohaaat bohaaat shukriya MuhammadAli bhai jaan jo ayat apas main takra rahin theen us ki apne bohaat achi wazahat kr dee hai Ab jo imam jalaludin sayuti ne apna qol likha hai k surat 9 ayat 5 wali ayat un tamam ayat ko mansookh kr rahih hai jo kufar se aman or sakoon k liye nazil huwin thee us aitraz ka jawab agar kisi ki tehqeeq ho tau jawab zaroor de den And if they incline to peace (read silm or salm, meaning, 'settlement'), then incline to it, and conclude a pact with them: Ibn 'Abbas said, 'This has been abrogated by the "sword verse” [Q. 2:191]'; Mujahid said, 'This [stipulation] applies exclusively in the context of the People of the Scripture, for it was revealed regarding the Banu Qurayza; and rely on God, put your trust in Him; truly He is the Hearer, of words, the Knower, of actions. (Tafsir al-Jalalayn; online source; bold and capital emphasis ours) Yeh imam jalalud din sayuti ka qol hai jis main woh bta rahe hain k kufar se aman or sakoon ki ayaten sari mansookh ho gayen hai surah 9 ayat 5 se jis main kufar se sirf kital ka hukam hai or kital hoga aman or sakoon nai hoga IS BAAT KA JAWAB ZAROOR INAYAT KREN AGAR KISI KI BHI YEHQEEQ HO BERELVI ULAMA KARAM KA AQWAL PESH KREN OR DOOSRE IMAM KI TAFSEERON MUFASIREEN K AQWAL SE JAWAB INAYAT KREN YA BERELVI ULAMA K AQWAL BHI KAFI HON GE :)

Nabi kareem ne Azl or londi k sath hum bistri ki ijazat kyun dee in ki kya wajoohat theen? londi k sath hum bistri krne ka kya sabab tha or yeh kyun halal kiya gya is ki wazahat kr den zara in hadeeson ki sharah se bhi wazahat kr den ta ke main jawab de sakon aage yahoodi ko

We used to practice coitus interruptus in the time of the Messenger of Allah when the Qur'an was revealed." He also narrated on the authority of Malik bin Anas, on the authority of Az-Zuhri, on the authority of Ibn Muhairiz, on the authority of Abu Sa'id Al-Khudri, may Allah be pleased with him, that he said: "We acquired some (female) captives and we were practicing coitus interruptus and we asked the Messenger of Allah (about it) and he said: "Do you do it?" He said it three times. "There will be no living person until the Day Resurrection, except that it is written that it will be, and so it is created." Al-Bukhari no. 5210, and Muslim no. 1438. It was also narrated by Abu Dawud that a man said: "O Messenger of Allah! I have a slave girl and I practice coitus interruptus with her, because I dislike that she should become pregnant. But I want (from her) what men want from her; and the Jews says that coitus interruptus is the minor from of burying alive." He replied: "The Jews told a lie, for if Allah wishes to create it, you would not be able to turn it away." You do not need your slave-girl's permission to practice 'azl with her[edit]Yahya related to me from Malik from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a man called Dhafif said that Ibn Abbas was asked about coitus interruptus. He called a slave-girl of his and said, "Tell them." She was embarrassed. He said, "It is alright, and I do it myself." Malik said, "A man does not practise coitus interruptus with a free woman unless she gives her permission. There is no harm in practising coitus interruptus with a slave-girl without her permission. Someone who has someone else's slave-girl as a wife, does not practise coitus interruptus with her unless her people give him permission." IN HADEESON PER AITRAZAT AYE HAIN KYA LONDI K SATH JAMA KRNA HALAAL HAI IS MASLAH PER WAZAHAT KR DEN Or kya londiyon ki ijazat k baghair un k sath krna jaiz hai? IS MASLAH KI TAFSEELI WAZAHAT KR DEN SHUKRIYA

Is Quran e Kareem ki Ayat per aitraz aya hai k yeh wali ayat So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Isl�m), while you are having the upper hand. God is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds. S. 47:35 Hilali-Khan is doosri Ayat se takra rahi hai Dono ayaten apas main ikhtalaf kr rahin hain But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it, and (put your) trust in God. Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower. S. 8:61 Hilali-Khan jawab inayat kren In 2 Quran e Kareem ki Ayat k baad Tafsir Jalalain jo imam jalalud din sayuti per bohat bara aitraz kiya gya jo main yahan paste kr raha hon And if they incline to peace (read silm or salm, meaning, 'settlement'), then incline to it, and conclude a pact with them: Ibn 'Abbas said, 'This has been abrogated by the "sword verse” [Q. 2:191]'; Mujahid said, 'This [stipulation] applies exclusively in the context of the People of the Scripture, for it was revealed regarding the Banu Qurayza; and rely on God, put your trust in Him; truly He is the Hearer, of words, the Knower, of actions. (Tafsir al-Jalalayn; online source; bold and capital emphasis ours) Imam jalalud din sayuti in hi 2 ayaton ko le kar farmate hain k jo ayat peace or sakoon k liye nazil huwi thee woh is ayat se mansookh ho gaye hai jis main larai krne ka hukam diya gya hai YEH BAAT KAHAN TAK THEEK HAI OR IS PER AITRAZ HAI K ISLAM TAU KHOON KHARABA OR QATAL KA DARS DETA HAI NOUZUBILLAH KYUNKI JO AYAT PEACE OR SAKOON K LIYE NAzil huwi K AGAR YAHOOD AP SE AMAN OR SAKOON CHAHEN TAU UN SE MAT LARO LEKIN IMAM JALLAUDIN SAYUTI NE LIKHA K YEH AYAT IS AYAT SE MANSOOKH HO GAYE HAI K JAHAN BHI INHEN PAKARO MAAR DO YEH AITRAZAT AYE HAIN JAWAB INAYAT KREN MAINE JO JO US YAHOODI K ALFAZ THEY WAISE K WAISE HI YAHAN BTA DIYE HAIN JO AITRAZAT US NE KIYE THEY

Assalamualaikum Usman bhai jan mujhe pta nai tha rules ka is liye yeh badmazhab website ka link lga diya tha us k liye mazrat chahta hon yeh post meri kafi purani post hai phir is post k baad jo maine posts keen theen un main bad mazhab ka link remove kr diya or koi link dobara use nai kiya Or bohaaat mazrat chahta hon mujhe is baat ka nai pta tha k S.A.W.W nai likhna chahiye main ainda is baat ka poora khyaal rakhon ga or koshish kron ga k us page ka scan provide kr don lekin scan ki zaroorat nai pare ge kyunki apne reply main hi mujhe jawab mil gya hai k Maulana sahab ne doosre logon ko quote kiya hai apka be had shukriya apne reply kiya Main ainda khyaal kron ga Nabi kareem ﷺ likha kron ga apni har post main apka bohaaat shukriya apne meri islah kee

Sahih bukhari Sahih Muslim Sunnan abu dawud Sunan ibn majah Sahih tirmizi Sunan Nisai Muwatta imam malik In books ki arabic or urdu sharah (Shuruhat) ki kitabon ki list or naam chahiyen university project main software banane k liye help kren gi In kitabon ki jitni bhi arabi or urdu shuruhat ho chuki hain agar kisi ko list or naam pata hain tau plz yahan likh den

JAWAB MIL GYA ABHI hadees parhte hi jawab mil gya sharah parhne ki zaroorat hi nai pari IS HADEES KO PARH KR APNA IMAAN MAZBOOT KREN

Yeh aik facebook page per humare Aqa NABI KAREEM ﷺ per Aitraz huwa hai Is ki wazahat kr den JAWAB INAYAT FARMAYEN

Great WORDS from 6:45 to 14:00 SYED HASHMI MIYAN NE IMAAN TAZA KR DIYA

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 139: Narrated Abdullah: We used to participate in the holy wars carried on by the Prophet and we had no women (wives) with us. So we said (to the Prophet). "Shall we castrate ourselves?" But the Prophet forbade us to do that and thenceforth he allowed us to marry a woman (temporarily) by giving her even a garment, and then he recited: "O you who believe! Do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you." Tafseer al Kabeer, by Imam Fakhr ul-Radhi, Page 42 & 43  Ibn Qalaba narrates Umar said, 'During the lifetime of Rasulullah(s) there were two types of Mut'ah, I now prohibit them and shall inflict the punishment of the Zina on its perpetrators. Sunni Reference: Kanz al Ummal Volume 8 p. 93 Bab Mut'ah  Sunni classical scholar, Hafidh Jallaluddin Suyuti, in Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume 2 p. 41 Ayat Mut'ah Ibn Abbas said: Mut'ah was blessing of Allah upon the Ummah of Muhammad and had Umar not prohibited it the only person to fornicate would be a wretched person. In the same book, we read on the next page: Hakim was asked whether the verse on Mut'ah has been abrogated, he said "No. Ali said: The Mut'ah is a blessing from Allah to his servants. If it were not for Umar forbidding it, no one would commit (the sin) of fornication except the wretched (Shaqi; an utmost wrongdoer).  We read in Tafseer Durre Manthur. Hadhrath Hakim was asked if the verse on Mut'ah had been abrogated . He replied "No, because Ali said if Umar had not banned Mut'ah, then the only person to fornicate would be a wretched person." Sunni Reference: Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume2 p. 40  Indeed, the Sahaba deemed Umar to be a liar when it came to this issue. We read in Tafseer Kabeer p. 41: "Imam Ali(as) said "Had Umar not banned Mut'ah then the only person to fornicate would be a wretched person." Tafseer al-Kabeer, Page 41  The only claim for the abrogation of Mut'ah which remains, then, is the only claim which is true: that it was "abrogated" by 'Umar, who of course had no authority to do such a thing. This acknowledgement is made in Ahl'ul Sunnah's esteemed work al Awail, wherein we read: "The first to make Mut'ah haraam was 'Umar" Al Awail  We quote from Ahlul Sunnah's authoritative, work Tafseer Ghareeb al Quran p. 6 part 5: The Sahaba of Rasulullah Imran Ibn Abi Husain said the verse of Mut'ah appeared in the Book of Allahand no verse descended to abrogate it. Rasulullah(s) gave order allowing for the practise of Mut'ah and we did Mut'ah in his presence. Rasulullah(s) dies and till then he did not refrain us from practising it, after him Umar gave his personal view and banned Mut'ah. 2 Aitraz huwe hain woh yeh jo uper shia ne reference diye hain unka jawab or doosra yeh k Nabi kareem S.A.W.W k time per Mutah ki ijazat kyun dee gaye agar yeh zina hai ?

According to the western world, the sun is the stationary centre of the universe and the earth revolves on its own axis as well as around the sun. Insha Allah hereunder you will find proof from the Holy Qur’an that the earth is in fact stationary and the sun revolves around in an orbit. It is therefore incumbent on us to believe what the Holy Qur’an teaches us and to reject the western school of thought. Allah Ta’ala states in the Holy Qur’an, “And the sun moves on a prescribed course. This is the Commandment of the Most Honourable, the Most Knowing.”[Surah 36, Verse 38] This tells us that the heavens and the earth are anchored and the stars are floating in them. The movement of the sun is until its appointed time i.e. until the Day of Judgment. [Tafseer Noorul Irfaan] Allah Ta’ala further states, “The sun is not permitted to overtake the moon, nor can the night overtake the day. And each is floating in an orbit. [Surah 36, Verse 40] The first part of the verse means that the sun cannot rise at night to take away the light of the moon. Also, it cannot move swiftly like the moon; therefore the stages which the moon completes in twenty-eight days are completed by the sun in one year. If the sun were as swift as the moon then the seasons would not be formed correctly. The last part of the verse tells us that the orbit of each planet is different and that the stars are floating in such a way like the fish in the sea. But the sky itself is stationary. [Tafseer Noorul Irfaan] In another verse it is stated, “The sun and the moon have been set proportionately.” [Surah 55, Verse 5] This refers to the speed of the moon and the sun, which is determined by Allah Ta’ala. The speed with which they complete the heavenly stages helps man to determine the solar and lunar months of the year. [Tafseer Noorul Irfaan] The Glorious Qur’an further tells us, “And He made the sun and moon subservient for you which are constantly moving, and made the day and night subservient for you.” [Surah 14, Verse 33] The sun and the moon are constant without any breakage in them, nor do they take any leave for the purpose of resting. They serve us in such a manner that they would never become tired or ever be off duty. They are in constant movement for millions of years so that we can determine our time for work and rest and derive countless benefits from them. [Tafseer Noorul Irfaan] In proving the static nature of the earth, the Holy Qur’an says, “Undoubtedly, Allah upholds the heavens and the earth lest they deviate.” [Surah 35, Verse 41] This tells us that neither the earth nor the sky is in motion. Only the stars, the moon and the sun are in motion. Thus even the ancient philosophy, which advocated the movement of the sky, is false, as well as the modern philosophy which accepts that the earth moves on its own axis. [Tafseer Noorul Irfaan] Besides the above verses, there are numerous other verses of the Holy Qur’an that prove that the earth is stationary and the sun is in rotation. Some of these verses are quoted hereunder: “And made the sun and the moon subservient. Each one runs to a term stated. Allah plans every affair and explains clearly the signs so that you may believe the meeting with your Lord.” [Surah 13, Verse 2] “And He made the sun and moon and stars subservient to His command.” [Surah 7, Verse 54] “And He made the day and the night, the sun and the moon subservient to you. And the stars are subservient by His command. Verily, in it there are signs for the wise people.” [Surah 16, Verse 12] “And it is He Who created the night and the day and the sun and the moon. Each one is floating in a circumference.” [Surah 21, Verse 33] “O listener! Did you not see that Allah turns night into the day and returns the day in the night and He makes the sun and the moon serve you? Each one pursues the course till an appointed term, and Allah is aware of your deeds.” [Surah 31, Verse 29] “And He engages the services of the sun and the moon that each one runs up to an appointed time. This is Allah, your Lord. His is the Kingdom of the entire universe.” [Surah 35, Verse 13] “And He has employed the sun and the moon into service. Each moves on its course to an appointed time. Do you hear? He is the Most Exalted in Power, the Most Forgiving.” [Surah 39, Verse 5] If someone insists on defending the western way of thought, then the following verse should suffice in answering them, “Does He not know, Who created? And He is the Knower of the minutest, being Well Aware.” [Surah 67, Verse 14] Therefore it is a clear denial and rejection of the Qur’anic verses to accept the sun as the static centre and the earth revolving around it. A’la Hazrat Imam Ahle Sunnat Imam Ahmad Raza Khan (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) has explained the Islamic theory (based on Qur’an and Hadith) that the earth is static. In favour of this A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) wrote the following treatises: Nuzool-e-Ayat-e-Furqan Besukoon-e-Zameen-o-Aasman Mueen-e-Mubeen Bahar Daur-e-Shams-o-Sukoon-e-Zameen Fauz-e-Mubeen Dar Radd-e-Harkat-e-Zameen In his first treatise, A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) has discussed the earth theory in light of the Qur’an and Hadith that the earth and sky are static, by quoting several verses from the Holy Qur’an. In his second treatise, A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) has elaborated that the sun is in motion while earth is static based on astronomical observations and calculations. In his treatise “Fauz-e-Mubeen” A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) has not only proved that earth is static with 105 argumentations in light of modern physics, but also criticized the ideas of renowned scientists like Galileo, Kepler, Newton and Albert Einstein. In “Fauz-e-Mubeen” A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) has discussed various scientific spheres of knowledge including Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Astronomy, Astrology, Mathematics, and covered the topics of planetary motion in the orbits and physical mechanics like attractive and repulsive forces, centripetal force, centrifugal force, friction coefficient, projectile motion, relative velocity, circular speed, buoyant force, density & pressure, structure of earth, theory of tides and distance from the sun, along with dozens of geometric diagram representations with algebraic, logarithmic and mathematical calculations. Subhaanallah! If this is the knowledge of the slave of Rasoolullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam), then what must be the knowledge of the Beloved Rasool (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) himself? Hereunder is an extract from the book “Fauz-e-Mubeen” to show us that not only does the Holy Qur’an disprove the western school of thought, but A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) has also scientifically proven (with extensive calculations, explanations and proofs) that the earth is stationary and the sun revolves around in an orbit. In his explanation, A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh) uses the assumption of the earth’s rotation to show the west how absurd a theory it is. “Two birds fly from a branch of a tree with equal speed to that of the earth’s rotation which is 1036 mph and one flies to the east and the other to the west. The one flying to the west will reach a distance of 2072 miles because as much as it went to the west, this branch went to the east due to the earth’s rotation. And the one going to the east will not move a hair’s length from the branch because as he is flying with the same speed the branch of the tree too, is going along with it. But we practically observe that both of them have equal speed going opposite to each other, and go to the same distance. If their speed of flying is less than that of the earth, for example 1035 mph, then the west-bound one will reach a distance of 2071 miles to the west. And its opponent, the east bound having toiled for an hour and having traversed 1035 miles will find itself only a mile away from the branch of that tree and that too, to its west. Isn’t it awkward that he just flew to the east direction and found himself to the west of the place? All this is absurd, false and contrary to observation.” This is just a small segment of one of the simpler arguments put forward by A’la Hazrat (Radiallahu Ta’ala Anh). In fact he even went on to refute, with numerous proofs, the assumption of scientists that the atmosphere also rotates with the earth, i.e. the bird will also move together with the branch due to the earth’s motion. However, it is too complicated to discuss here. We can therefore see that without doubt the earth is stationary. It does not rotate on its axis nor does it rotate around the sun. It is the sun, moon and stars that rotate in orbits and it is obligatory on us to believe in this, since refutation of even a single verse of the Holy Qur’an throws us out of the fold of Islam.

Nabi kareem S.A.W.W hayat hain Hayat un nabi per hi munazra kr lo hazir o nazir ka tau jawab ap ab de nai sake itne dalail k baad Yeh aik choti si jhalki dikhaye hai munazra kr len Hayat un nabi pe

Kashmeerkhan bhai jaan apne tau bolti hi band kr dee deobandi wahabi najdi ki

Tohfa jafria ki yeh jild number 1,3,4 yeh internet per kahin bhi nai mil rahin yeh aik website per theen haq chaar yaar jo shiyon k radd main hain lekin woh website bhi band ho chuki hai Ab internet per Tohfa jafria ki yeh jilden kahin bhi available nahin hain Agar kisi bhi bhai jaan k paas yeh jilden hon tau lazman upload kr de urgently chahiyen TOHFA JAFRIA JILD 1,3,4 MAULANA MUHAMMAD ALI NAQSHBANDI KI

GREAT AQEELAHMEDWAQAS BHAI JAAN APNE AESA RADD KR DIYA K AB TAU SHIA APNE MOUN KHOLNE SE PEHLE 100 BAAR SOCHEN GE APNE TAU UNKE AITRAZ KI DHAJIYAN BEKHER K RAKH DEEN APKA BE HAD SHUKRIYA K AP APNA WAQT NIKAL KR MERE POSTS KA REPLY KRTE HAIN MAIN APKA BE HAD SHUKAR GUZAR HON MUJHE HAMESHA IS PLATFORM SE AITRAZ KA JAWAB MIL JATA HAI

Assalamualaikum AqeelAhmedWaqas bhai jaan ap ne tau poora aitraz ka hi post martem kr diya Ap ka BOHAAAT SHUKRIYA AP NE APNA KEEMTI WAQT NIKAL KR AITRAZ KA TAFSEELI JAWAB DIYA. Maine bohaat sari websites or different articles parhe lekin kisi bhi jagan koi sahi jawab mojood nai tha mujhe pta tha yahan post kron ga tau lazman tafseeli jawab mil jaye ga Mujhe is baat ki khushi hai k jahan is platform se deobandi or wahabiyon ka radd hota aaya hai ab yahoodiyon or eesaiyon ka bhi rad ho raha hai Ap ne itna tafseeli jawab de diya k ab koi aitraz baqi hi nai raha AP KA BE HAD SHUKRIYA ALLAH APKE ILM MAIN IZAFA FARMAYE APKA JAWAB HAMESHA TASALLI BAKSH OR TAFSEEL SE HOTA HAI.

Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal. (Sunnan abu dawud hadith (38:4450) IS HADEES PER AITRAZ AYA HAI AHLE TASHI SHIA KA Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma’i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab’i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said: "The prophet – peace be upon him – said, ‘If one sits between a woman’s four parts (shu’biha Al-arba’) and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.’ In the hadith of Mattar it is added ‘even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).’ Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase ‘Ashba’iha Al-arba’. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu’bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu’bah it has the phrase ‘then he labored’ but did not have the phrase ‘even if he does not ejaculate. (Sahih Muslim- Book of menstruation Hadith 525 ) IS HADEES PER IMAM NAWAWI KI SHARAH HAI WOH YEH HAI صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith The saying of the prophet – peace be upon him- ‘When he sits between a her fours parts) mostly its home animal (shu’biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her’ In another narration the word ‘Ashu’biha’ is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of ‘shu’biha Al-arba’ (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu’ means areas, its singular form being (Shu’bah). As for those who say (Ashba’iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu’. The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase ‘she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted’. Al-Qadi Ayad – may Allah rest his soul- said ‘Primarily, the word (Jahada’ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh’d) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying ‘he who plowed her’ meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best. The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. “the head of the male member,” i.e. head of the ) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously. Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman's anus, or a man's anus, or an animal's vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the is erect or not, whether the is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing. Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best. If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best. IS SHARAH K ANDER JO UNDERLINE KIYA HAI US PER BOHAT BARA AITRAZ AYA HAI AIK SHIA KA K AHLE SUNNAT KI HADEES KI KITABON MAIN OR SHARAH MAIN AESI GANDAGI HAI NOUZUBILLAH IS KI TAFSEEL SE WAZAHAT KR DEN

MuhammadAli bhai jaan maine yeh article parha hai or bhi bohat sare article parhe hain lekin un main zyada wazahat or sahi radd nai kiya gya Or tafsir jalalain k ander is ayat k neeche Imam jalalud din sayuti ne yeh story kyun naqal kee is ki wazahat kr den TAFSIR JALALAIN TAU DARS E NIZAMI MAIN PARHAYE JATI HAI US K ANDER IS STORY KO KYUN NAQAL KIYA K NOUZUBILLAH NABI KAREEM S.A.W.W NE SHAITAN KA KAHA MANA NOUZUBILLAH IS KI WAZAHAT KR DEN

Tafsir Jalalayn ka scan HAQEEQAT MAIN YEH STORY IBN ISHAQ SIRA SE NIKLI HAI JIS KO IMAM TABARI NE TAFSIR TABARI MAIN NAQAL KIYA HIA

* تفسير Tafsir al-Jalalayn { وَمَآ أَرْسَلْنَا مِن قَبْلِكَ مِن رَّسُولٍ وَلاَ نَبِيٍّ إِلاَّ إِذَا تَمَنَّىٰ أَلْقَى ٱلشَّيْطَانُ فِيۤ أُمْنِيَّتِهِ فَيَنسَخُ ٱللَّهُ مَا يُلْقِي ٱلشَّيْطَانُ ثُمَّ يُحْكِمُ ٱللَّهُ آيَاتِهِ وَٱللَّهُ عَلِيمٌ حَكِيمٌ } And We did not send before you any messenger (rasūl) — this is a prophet who has been commanded to deliver a Message — or prophet (nabī) — one who has not been commanded to deliver anything — but that when he recited [the scripture] Satan cast into his recitation, what is not from the Qur’ān, but which those to whom he [the prophet] had been sent would find pleasing. The Prophet (s) had, during an assembly of the [men of] Quraysh, after reciting the [following verses from] sūrat al-Najm, Have you considered Lāt and ‘Uzzā? And Manāt, the third one? [53:19-20] added, as a result of Satan casting them onto his tongue without his [the Prophet’s] being aware of it, [the following words]: ‘those are the high-flying cranes (al-gharānīq al-‘ulā) and indeed their intercession is to be hoped for’, and so they [the men of Quraysh] were thereby delighted. Gabriel, however, later informed him [the Prophet] of this that Satan had cast onto his tongue and he was grieved by it; but was [subsequently] comforted with this following verse that he might be reassured [of God’s pleasure]: thereat God abrogates, nullifies, whatever Satan had cast, then God confirms His revelations. And God is Knower, of Satan’s casting of that which has been mentioned, Wise, in His enabling him [satan] to do such things, for He does whatever He will. Is TOPIC PER SALMAN RUSHDIE JAISE GHATIYA LOGON NE BOOKS LIKHI HAIN IS KI WAZAHAT KR DEN Yeh story jo Tafsir tabari main milti hai jis main Nabi kareem S.A.W.W or 3 shaitanon ka zikar hai LAT UZZA MANAT MUJHE IS TOPIC PER YEH MILA HAI K IS STORY KI CHAIN MAIN AL WAQIDI HAI JO DIFFERENT STORIES BNAYA KRTA THA NABI KAREEM S.A.W.W K BARE MAIN Salman rushdie or bohat se logon ne is per aitrazat kiye hain tafsir tabari Or sab se pehli sira Ibn Ishaq k ander bhi is story ka zikar hai or Tafsir jalalain main bhi zikar hai IS KI WAZAHAT KR DEN IMAM JALALUD DIN SAYUTI NE IS STORY KO KYUN TAFSIR MAIN LIKHA IS KI BHI WAZAHAT KR DEN YEH SAWALAT YAHOODIYON KI TARAF SE AA RAHE HAIN OR BOHAAT Sare AITRAZAT AA RAHE HAIN WAZAHAT KR DEN

Sag e Madinah bhai jaan in deobandiyon se behas krni fazool hai Woh jahil hai apni hi baat per ara huwa hai Khalil Ran BHAI JAAN NE OR Sag e Madinah bhai jaan apne or KashmeerKhan bhai jaan ne tafseeli jawab de diya hai ab koi aitraz baqi nai rehta Deobandi bhai apne apni jahalat ka muzahira kiya hai apko na tau science ka ilm hai or na hi apne ALA hazrat ki kitaabon ko bareeqi se dekha hai Ap fazool behas kr rahe hain Sag e Madinah Bhai jaan woh tau jahil hai us ne behas nai khatam krni ap isko iske haal per chor den ap jo bhi sawaal kren ge us k paas jawab nai hoga or woh na hi jawab dega deobandi sahib na tau apne inertia newtons law parha hai or na hi apne momentum parha hai jo k 9th 10th class k bachon ko parhaya jata ha physics main or ap chalen hai munazra krne ALA HAZRAT KI KITABEN APNE KHOL K NAI DEKHIN OR BEHAS PE BEHAS KIYE JA RAHE HAIN YEH SIRF APKI JAHALAT KA SABOOT HAI K APKO BILKUL SCIENCE NAI AATI JAISA K Sag e Madinah bhai jaan ne kaha apko momentum or inertia k bare main kya pta hoga jab apko OBSERVATION PREDICTION OR THEORY K BARE MAIN KUCH NAI PTA

Assalamualaikum BOHAAAAAAT BOHAAAAT SHUKRIYA APKA AqeelAhmedWaqas Bhai jaan ap ne poore maslah ki tafseeli jawab de kr wazahat kr dee hai ab koi aitraz baqi nai raha Is maslah per bohaat zyada aitraz aa rahe they apne tafseeli jawab main sari baaton ka jawab de diya APKA BE HAD SHUKRIYA AqeelAhmedWaqas Bhai jaan ALLAH APKO SALAMAT RAKHE OR APKO OR ILM ATA KRE