MuhammedAli

Salam meri behan, Allah ta'ala aap kay jazbay ko salamat aur imaan o amal ko salamat rakhay, meri behan agar aap english par aur samaj sakti hen toh meray articles yahan par mojood hen: http://www.islamimehfil.com/forum/94-articles-and-stories/ Aap in ko paren aur samjen, jab aap samaj jahen gee toh phir discuss karen. Yeh Urdu link heh is meh hamaray ek Sunni baee, joh be hen Allah ta'ala un kay darjaat ko buland karay unoon nay hazaroon kee tadad meh kitabeh lagahi hen, un ko paren aur apnay rishtay daroon say share karen: http://www.scribd.com/Muhammad%20Tariq%20Lahori Wahabiyoon Deobandiyoon kay khilaf bot kuch material heh.

s a l a m a l a y q u m m e r a y b a e e b u r a m a t m a n a y e h g a m a g a r a a p k o f o r m a t in g y e h w a l i k i s s i k i m a d a d h e h y a u s k a y s a r k g u m a n a y k a k o h i t a r e e q ? Jahan par aap itni mehnat kartay hen ek message likhnay meh sirf ek mint ka kaam heh formating darust karnay ka, logoon kay leyeh deen samajnay kee asaani karen, jistera aap nay mera nahin para hoga istera mujjay yaqeen nahin kohi aur aap ka be paray ga. Deen kee samaj ko itna asaan bananay kee koshish karen kay aap kee koshish honi chahyeh kay paani meh mix kar kay Rooh Afza kee tera pila doon.

Introduction: The Very Rigorously Argued Path: Zindeeq’s demand explicit evidence from Quran/Hadith for innovated practices by saying; show me one verse, one hadith, which states celebration of birth day of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam), Geeyarweenh and others are to be practiced or establishes that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) practiced them or his companions, or Tabiyeen Taba Tabiyeen practiced them in their lives. We Muslim’s reason with Ahadith; who so ever innovates good Sunnah, good biddat which is followed after him, there will be reward for him and those who follow it equale to one who innovated it. So Milad, Geeyarween, are combinations of various forms of; worship, Sunnats, hence they are good by nature, rewardworthy and permissible to engage in. In these practices people engage in Dua which is worship. Giving foods, reciting Quran, remembering Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala), engaging in Nawafil, all these are Sunnats and actions were of companions but Zindeeq dismisses this methodology of validating a practice. Zindeeq doesn’t want to acknowledge this methodology nor accepts this way of legitimzing innovated practices/innocations but instead Zindeeq wants explicit evidence, using filmi type of dialogues. Saying; this is patch work scholarship, bit from there and bit from there and you made your practice legitimate, this is how all people of innovation supported their innovations. Explicit Or Implicit Evidence Methodology – To Choose Or Not To Choose: Establish methodology which will be used to validate practices. There are two metholdogies of validating a practice, 1) explicit evidence, 2) implicit evidence – patch work scholarship, in other words, bit from here and there and making a whole type scholarship. Make sure you have agreement from your opponent which methodology is valid, have it written from him. Eye For Eye And Explicit For Explicit: If he wants to go the explicit evidence methodology, then you go on the war path without the battle cry. Charge into the centre of battle and say; can you quote me a verse of Quran or Hadith in which Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) or Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) instructed the Muslims to read Sahih of Imam Bukhari or Sahih of Imam Muslim for sake of learning about the religion of Islam? Each time he utters something, you just demand; one clear, explicit, unequivocal Hadith or Ayat which instructs the Muslims to take Bukhari, Muslim as source of Islam. Rest assured there does not exist such Ayat or Hadith. If Zindeeq has knowledge he will use verses of Quran which indirectly/implicitly make a plausible case for Hadith but not for Bukhari/Muslim. You keep reminding him; brother you said explicit proof, now I want explicit evidence for Sahih Al Bukhari/Muslim. The verses you quoted are vaguely implying Hadith but not clearly stating we read or use Bukhari/Muslim for our deen – I want clear explicit unequivocal evidence for Bukhari/Muslim, with their names mentioned in text of the Hadith/Ayat. When nothing works then suggest to him that his demand for clear, explicit text of Hadith or Ayat for validation of something in Islam is unjust. Ijtihad on matters which did not exist in time of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is based on the indirect evidence. These matters which are innovated after the time of Prophet, companions, therefore these are matters of ijtihad which do not require explicit direct evidence rather implicit indirect or ijtihadi evidence to judge their permissibility. Sahihs of Imam Bukhari/Muslim, celebration of Prophet’s (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) birthday as it is done in modern times is later invention. Without explicit sanction by Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) we have made Sahih Bukhari and Muslim as part of deen and we use them to learn deen. If without explicit text it is permissible to employ Sahih Bukhari/Muslim then why should we need explicit text to celebrate birthday of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam)? Point out that Mr Zindeeq used indirect/implicit evidence to establish the legitimacy of Bukhari/Muslim yet demanded that Muslims present clear/explicit evidence for the practices which originated after the time of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Tell him the explicit methodology fails to establish legitimacy of Bukhari/Muslim as well as celebration of birthday of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and other innovated practices. With indirect/implicit evidence methodology, which he used to establish Bukhar/Muslim, a Muslim can also establish celebrating birthday of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam), and other innovated practices. The Real Aim And The Clear Objective: Your objective was not to refute the legitimacy of Sahih Bukhari or Sahih Muslim nor to put doubt in the mind of Zindeeq rather the objective was to refute his methodology – demanding explicit evidence methodology and correct it to implicit evidence methodology. Explicit evidence methodology is being wrongly employed by Zindeeq’s. This demand can only be made if someone claims y is Sunnat of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) or Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) instructed us to do this. Once you have established that explicit evidence methodology for legitimacy of a innovation is not valid methodology you are on the way to K.O. your Zindeeq. Correct Methodology Of Establishing Permissibility: Bakr: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) performed two Sunnats in the morning prayers. Umar: Can you please quote me explicit, clear text of Hadith which establishes this claim of yours. Ali: It is permissible to recite Surah Ikhlas in the morning after Fajr prayer. Zindeeq: Produce one Ayat or Hadith where Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) instructed the Muslims to or Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) himself recited Surah Ikhlas after Fajr prayer. Considering it permissible to recite Surah Ikhlas before or after Fajr prayers is not valid basis for Zindeeq to demand the permissibility of reciting Surah Ikhlas after Fajr prayer be established via route of it being Sunnah of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). This is not the methodology of the Muslims nor the Zindeeq’s themselves but when it involves inter-sectarian issues then the Zindeeqs engage such dubious scholarship to forbid which is good. Has propogation of Islam over internet been made permissible after it was established that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) himself used internet or instructed the use of internet for propogation of Islam? So why should one has to establish that reciting Surah Ikhlas before/after the Fajr prayer is permissible on the back of establishing it has a Sunnah? Why should the celebration of birthday of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and other innovated practices be only permissible after they have been established has Sunnah of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam)? Permissibility is not established based on the condition that practice is Sunnah of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Permissibility for a practice is established based on if the practice combines various Sunnahs of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) – like dua, recitation of Quran, performing of Nawafil, propogating Islam, feeding the poor, friends, family, and clothing the poor. In short as long as the innovated practice is composed of various aspects of Isamic activities which have been sanctioned/instructed in Quran/Hadith the practice is permissible. Refuting A Zindeeq And Establishing Permissibility: As a demonstration, Zindeeq considers y to be reprehensible innovation. Ask him what type of evidence will your position and disprove his. He will likely to respond with something similar to the following; proof of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) instructing y or Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) engaging in y himself and failure will establish it is innovation – innovation which takes to hellfire. Say to him y is a innovated praiseworthy Sunnah/Biddah then quote the Hadith which tells of reward for one who introduces praiseworthy Sunnah and for those who follow it. You ask him how do we establish a practice is praiseworthy? If his answer matches the one above given and repeated again - innovated Sunnah/Biddah has to be composed of aspects taught in Quran/Hadith, it is fine but also educate him with the following. Quote the words of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam): "If somebody innovates something which is not in harmony with the principles of our religion that thing is rejected.” [Ref: Muslim, B49, H861]. What ever does not accord with the teachings of Islam it is to be rejected but what so ever is from the teaching of Islam as a whole or part of innovated practice is accepted and permitted. Every Sunnah of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is good, acts of worship, charity, kindness, etc are good hence they cannot be against the spirit of Islam and they are of part of Islam and what is part of Islam cannot be evil nor bad. Actions done in various innovated practices are acts of worship, charity, love, effection, rememberance of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and means of preaching Islam. Hence these practices come into the category of good Sunnah, for which there is reward if followed. Implicit Evidence Methodology To Establish Permissibility: Note this, no Zindeeq would ever agree to use implicit methodology for establishing permissibility because then nature of discussion defeats his objective. If someone ever agreed to it, he/she will loose the debate. All that is required you request how he/she will determine a practice is permissible. Likely he/she would not know how to answer this question. So to help him/her to understand how they determine permissibility of actions which are not Sunnah you ask number of questions. Muslim: 1) Is it permissible to use internet? 2) Is it permissible to use internet to propogate Islam? 3) Is it permissible to watch belly dancing on internet? Answering the first question, he might say depends on for what purpose you use internet for. Or he/she may also say, it is permissible by its nature cause it has good connected to it. The first answer would establish, that internet by itself is not bad but what you do with makes it good/bad. The second answer, would establish that even though there are bad elements with internet as long as one engages in good, it is permissible. Answering to question two he may say, it is permissible to propogate Islam on internet. You then ask him based on what evidence? He will likely say, Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) instructed to spread the message beautifully, reading is recommended because Allah(subhanahu wa ta’ala) said read in the name of your Lord, we write so other read about Islam and this is beautiful presentation of Islam to non-Muslims. From this we establish it is permissible to use internet to propogate message of Islam because it is a good method. Answer to question three he may say; it is haram to watch belly dancing. Here you ask him, based on what evidence watching a woman belly dance is Haram? He will likely say, because you are watching a ghair-mehram woman dressed semi naked dancing sexually. Here to point out, he does not have explicit evidence prohibiting belly dancing but he has implied the prohibition because the dance contradicts a aspect of Islam. Tell him that his principle is; if a action/practice goes against teaching of Islam the action/practice is Haram. The Derived Principles And What They Establish Overall: Based on the answers to first question we derive the following general principles: 1) permissibility depends on for what purpose you use practice/action for. 2) it is permissible by its nature cause it has good connected to it. The other side of the elephant is: 1) Action/Practice by itself is not bad but what you do in it makes it good/bad. 2) Even though there are bad elements with action/practice as long as one engages in good, it is permissible. Answer to second question yielded the following general understandings which I will expand a little: We are instructed to spread the message beautifully and we are instructed to read, and remember, and listen therefore it serves this purpose – hence using it for progation is permissible. Answer to the third question yields that he deems it Haram based on the principle; if a action/practice goes against teaching of Islam the action/practice is Haram. Note these principles will help you to refute him with regards to innovative practices which are composed of good practices of Islam but apart from this you have established to him that for practices/actions which do not have clear, explict, direct, evidence we judge if parts of it are in contradiction to Islam. If those bits/parts of which the practice/action is composed of, contradicts a teaching or teachings of Islam then the practice/action is Haram. If the action/practice is composed of bits/parts which accord the teaching of Islam then it is permissible. Employing The Derived Principles Against The Opponent: Let’s invent a practice for a Zindeeq’s education sake. The name of practice is Monday. The activity in the practice is: reciting the Darood Ibrahimi, Surah Fatihah, Surah Ikhlas, Surah Kauthar, Surah Jinn, Surah Ya Seen, Darood Ibrahimi, in the same order, twelve times each, on every Monday, and then invoking Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and making following dua: O Allah you are the Rabb of Alameen, you are ar’Rahman and ar’Raheem, I gift the rewards of my recitation of those Surahs of Quran to all the; Ambiyah (alayhis salam) , to three protected generations, the Awliyah-Allah who came thereafter, to the Momineen/Moninaat, to the Muslimeen/Muslimaat, and to those Muslims not born yet, and those who will be born uptil judgment day, O Allah Rabil Alameen I gift the reward to them all, ameen. Now you ask the Zindeeq is Monday permissible or impermissible? If he says’s permissible, you have two options; !) you question him why it is permissible? What ever his answer is, the undercurrent of matter is he is making Monday permissible based on implicit evidence and not explicit evide, remember that point. !!) Or you can move to next topic like Mawlad Un Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and define what it is and what is done in it, and ask if it is permissible or innovation which will lead to hellfire? If he says, Biddat/Haram take him back to his principle that if bits/parts are established from Quran/Hadith the practice is permissible not Haram. Coming back to the main question if Monday is Haram or Halal. If he he says Haram, it is time to employ his own rules upon him and point out his inconsistantcy in application of his own methodology. Note he used bits/parts to permit and prohibit, if Zindeeq holds to this methodology, a Muslim can also utilize this methodology to establish permissibility of Monday. The bits/parts of Monday are also established from Sunnah. Two Methodologies Employed To Establish Permissibility: The readers should note in this article two methods of establishing permissibility have been employed. One, utilized the Hadith of good Sunnah/Biddah and argued all the acts of worship, charity, civility established from Quran/Sunnah are good. Therefore if any practice is composed of these Sunnahs then it is permissible. Second, utilizes the principles derived from the answers of Zindeeq and uses them to argue against his own position with aid of practices which are Sunnahs. Strictly there is no restriction upon to employ one methodology at a time. In most discussions you will have to switch between these two methodologies. You must be prepared for the switch from one to another and ideally it would be best if you can mix them both in a discussion. If you want to employ deriving principles from Zindeeq’s answers to pin the Wahhabi down with his own methodology then it would be best to know the definition of innovation properly. It is essential that onefamiliarises with ‘Wahhabi’ definition of innovation and its proper explanation. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi

Abhi taq aap ka khiyaal nahin badla ... ajeeb baat heh shahzad baee.

Jis par Allah ta'ala kee lanat us kee maut is anjam par hoti heh. Allah ta'ala ham sunniyoon ko apni hifazat meh rakhay. Hamara iman, amal, ishq o muhabbat, qayim o dahim rakhay. Ya Allah maut Islam par deh, eman par deh, apni muhabat aur ibadat aur apnay habib kee muhabbat aur tazeem par deh, Ya Allah mujjay aur meri walden, behan bahiyoon, meri nasal ko ta qayamat taq tamam fitnoon say mafooz rakh aur hammeh apnay habib kee shaan kay difa meh jaan laranay wala bana deh. Ya Allah tera shukr, tera shukr kay tooh nay mujjay in mardood say nikal kar apnay habib kay ashiqeen ki saf meh la khara keeya, ya Allah meh nay ibrat hasil kee is mardood ki maut say, ya Allah is kee maut ko auroon kay leyeh bi nishan e ibrat bana ameen. Al hamdulillahi rabil Alameen.

please note i mistakenly clasified the dispute to; Not As Described, took time to write and session kept signing out. so i forgot to change the nature of dispute. Items were and are not delivered to this day ...

Salam alayqum. Recently I have been writing quite a bit and reworking my old material removing mistakes and restructuring them. I cannot edit my old posts and because of this i have old and new material in the same article ... I was wondering if Admin team could grant me limited ability to edit my own material. I am not interested in being a Moderator ... I dont have much time to Mod the forum ... but I would like some ability to be able to edit my own articles. If that is possible please let me know. Also can someone tranfer my article to Islami Eduction english section, I suppose to be doing this my self, but I have been awfully busy with work and writing. I am gladly willing someone else to earn this bit of sawab . please by my fave guest and place them on Islamieducation. I have been so busy that i havent had the time to upload my old articles even yet. So far I have written 150+ articles on various subjects out of which about 100 are online.

Introduction: Hadhrat Ibn Umar (radiallah ta’ala anhu) narrates that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was making dua for Sham and Yemen: "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." Some people from the gathering said: "Our Najd as well." Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) continued: "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." The people said again: "Our Najd as well." Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) ignored the request and said: “There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the group of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, B17, H147] This establishes Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) ignored their request to make dua of blessing for Najd and informed them that group of Satan will emerge from Najd. Wahhabism Emerges From Najd: In the 17th century just as Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) foretold Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab appeared in region of Najd accusing Muslims of Shirk – thus invalidating their belief in Islam. On grounds of this he legalized the killing and the property of Muslims. Legalized enslaving of their wives, daughters, sisters, mothers, and legalized engaging in sexual acts with the enslaved Muslim women without Nikkah. On grounds that these women are polytheist slaves which are property of the master and he can do what he likes to what he owns. Including forced sexual activity without Nikkah and sexual activity with already married Muslim women. Thus he applied all the Ihkams of Sharia upon Muslims reserved for polytheist non-Muslims. This reveals how he and his sect truly sees the Muslims – see the Muslims as polytheistic Kafirs. Apart from emerging Najd his followers folded the lion cloth from waste – which revealed their ankles. They also excessively shaved their heads and these were the signs mentioned in Ahadith about the first Khariji in the time of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). His name was Abdullah bin Dhil Khuwaisirah he is reported to have said: “The news come to me from the heaven morning and evening. Then there stood up a person with deep snnken eyes, prominent cheek bones, and elevated forehead, thick beard, shaven head, tucked up loin cloth, and he said: Messenger of Allah, fear Allah.” [Ref: Muslim, B5, H2319] The missionary center of Wahhabism was based in Al Dirriyah which almost exact east from Madinah. The following Hadith narrates what Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “Sahl b. Hunaif reported Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There would arise from the east a people with shaven heads.” [Ref: Muslim, Book 005, Number 233] Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have informed that to kill a Muslim is Kufr and to accuse a Muslim of being Kafir, atleast one of the two (i.e. accused and accuser) is Kafir. Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab along side minions are engaged in accusing the Muslims of committing major Shirk which is a diplomatic way of saying polytheistic Kafir. It is firmly established from the Ahadith that Muslims of Arabian Peninsula as a whole and Muslims of world as whole in general will never fall into Shirk. Based on these two factors; 1) killing Muslims and 2) falsely accusing Muslims of being polytheists, they are the Kuffar being foretold to emerge from east of Madinah, in the following Hadith: “It is narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessings be upon him) remarked: The summit of unbelief is towards the East and the pride and conceitedness is found among the owners of horses and camels who are rude and uncivil, people of the tents, and tranquillity is found among those who rear goats and sheep.” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H87] Hence Wahhabism is, the sect, the gathering, the group, the peak/summit of Kufr foretold by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) to appear from east of Madinah in Najd. Wahhabi Belief Najd And East Are In Iraq: Considering the seriousness of the charge levelled against the Wahhabism – Wahhabism is the group of Satan, the group of Kufr. The Wahhabi’s have resorted to distorting the Hadith. They argue, Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was Iraq, by Najd Iraq was intended, or Najd is Iraq east is toward Iraq. Wahhabi Justification – Why Iraq Is Najd: Following quote gives reasons why the Wahhabi’s believe Najd is Iraq, quote: “The region today known as "najd" in Saudi Arabia was not historically known by that name, in part because the meaning of the word najd (an elevated region and a region that is to the East) does not accurately describe the part of modern-day Saudi Arabia known as Najd (which is a region that is not directly East of Medina, where Muhammad sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam was when the hadith in question was said, and is also a region that is not elevated above Medina). In respect to Medina, which as I mentioned is the area where this hadith was said, the "najd" would refer more accurately to Iraq. The 'ulama of the past were united in understanding this. Furthermore, the "najd" is a term that partially depends on your location; thus, there were thirteen regions that were historically known as "najd." There are number of claims being made by the author; 1) modern Najd historically was not known by name Najd, 2) because the word Najd means elevated/raised [land] which does not accurately describe modern Saudi Najd, 3) modern Saudi region of Najd is not in east and Najd is to east from Madinah, 4) Ulamah were united on Najd being Iraq, 5) there were thirteen Najds known historically. The author makes his case clear that Najd of the Hadith in discussion is Iraq and not ‘modern’ Najd. His first point, ‘modern’ Najd not being known by the name of Najd in time of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) has been addressed, here. The following points; ‘modern’ Najd is not East of Madinah, Ulamah of past agreed Iraq is Najd and existance of thirteen Najds historically, will be dealt individually in separate articles in due time. The second point that Najd means elevated land and the ‘modern’ Najd is not elevated land and Najd is Iraq due to this reason, will be discussed here in the article. Linguistic Meaning Of Iraq And Najd: Wahhabi’s argue Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) used the word Najd. Najd means high/raised land therefore Iraq was intended target of Najd and not Eastern Arabian province of Najd. Point to note is that the Wahhabi’s focus on the lingusitic meaning of Najd but not Iraq. There is reason for this, the word Iraq means land of rivers, streams and it is flat land consisting of marshes, and flat dry regions. By presenting the reality of Iraq as well as Najd and then arguing Najd means Iraq, it would establish a glaring inconsistancy. If Iraq is linguistic najd then how can it be low laying flat land? Iraq is either a low laying flat land or mountainous terrain (i.e. najd). If it is mountain it is not flat and if it is flat it is not moutain. In another words, If it is najd then it is not Iraq and if it is Iraq then its not najd. Maps On Ground Elevation Data Of Various Cities Of Iraq And Najd: On the bottom of picture the ground elevation figures given above will be shown. Compare and tele the data with maps and also do verify it independantly using daftlogic website. Please note the figures will increase/decrease depending upon where the marker was placed. You are more then welcome to use daftlogic tool to varify the data presented above. All you have to do is find the cities, click on a random location on the map and it will give you ground elevation, that’s all. Following three maps are of locations within Arabian Peninsula: Following four maps will be of various cities of Iraq and important places connected with Khawarij. It is recommended that readers use the daftlogic website to do a comprehensive authentication of the claim that Iraq in respect to Saudi Arabian Najd is a low land. Bare Facts About Ground Elevation Of Cities Of Iraq And Najd: Hisotrical Najd consisted of modern provinces of Riyadh, Al Qassim, and Ha'yil. These provinces are in direction of east and fit the linguistic meaning of Najd (i.e. elivated land). - Riyadh: 614.071 M 2014.670 Feet - Buraydah: 623.899 M 2046.914 Feet - Ha'yil: 1012.044 M 3320.355 Feet - Baghdad 40.997 M 134.506 Feet - Nahrawan 38.724 M 127.049 Feet - Najaf 55.923 M 183.475 Feet - Kufa (roughly) 28.000 M 91.870 Feet In contrast to Najd (Saudi provinces; Riyadh, al Qassim, Ha'yil) Iraq is a low land. This is enough to refute the claim that Najd referrs to Iraq due to Najds linguistic meanings. It has been established that Iraq is a flat land. Where as the Saudi province of Najd is a raised/mountainous terrain and the linguistic meaning also fits Saudi eastern province of Najd perfectly. Therefore the Wahhabi claim that the linguisitic meaning of word Najd fits unto Iraq has been refuted. The region which Ahle Sunnat consider to be Najd in Saudi Arabia is in accordance with the linguistic meaning of najd. Maps Demonstrating The Linguistic Meaning Of Najd And Iraq: Below is the map of Saudi Arabia in it’s original form: The following map is Saudi Wahhabi states designated Najd: The following map contains in green the Najd designated by Saudi Wahhabi state. The red outline of Najd is linguistic Najd. The blue outline of Najd is one which I have managed to decipher from the geographical data passed on by Islamic geographers. This blue outline is not precise just about rough outline of historical Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). This blue Najd is where Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat believe historical Najd is and not in Iraq. Following map was googled in google images using search term ‘Saudi Topography’. It was part of article, Geography Of Saudi Arabia., following is direct link to the map, click. Following is the picture of Iraq, please compare with central Arabian Najd: The region which Ahle Sunnat deem as being Najd is between 500 metres and 1500 metres in comarision to sea level. Iraq on other hand is pretty is between 25 metres to 150 metres in height. You can see Iraq is definitely not the linguisitic najd which the Wahhabi’s want the Muslims to believeit. Conclusion: The position of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat that Najd is in East of Madinah and it is a province within Arabian Peninsula is supported and established by topographical maps. The linguistic meaning of Najd – raised/elevated land perfectly fits unto the Saudi Arabian province of Najd. In contrast to Najd, Iraq is a low laying land between Saudi Arabia and Iran and the linguisitic meaning of Iraq – land of rivers, streams perfectly fit it. In light of all the evidence it is safe to conclude that the Wahhabi position is based on gross distortion of facts and I dare say deliberate attempt to distort the Hadith of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Over all conclusion is that Najd of Hadith of group of Satan is directly east of Madinah and Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab was born in this Najd. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi

Introduction: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was making dua for Yemen and Shaam. The inhabitants of Najd requested Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) to also mention Najd in his dua. Twice Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) ignored their request and third time informed them the group of Satan will emerge from Najd, hence he cannot make dua for Najd.[1] Najd is located exact east of Madinah comprimising vast region around Saudi capital Riyadh. The Wahhabi brand of Kharijism emerged from exact east of Madinah. Founder of Wahhabi branch of Kharjism Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab at-Tamimi was born in Uyaynah about 70 km northwest of Riyadh. After his return from Iraq he made Al Dirriyah his missionary centre. From there with aid of Al Saud family’s millitary muscle he began to raid and kill Muslims on grounds that muslims in Arabian Peninsula are polytheist – worst then polytheists who lived at the time of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).[2] Followers of this group of Shaytaan have invented new Najd to fit the Hadith of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) in a vain attempt to discredit the charge that Wahhabism is a new manifestation of Kharijism which emerged from Najd. Belief Of Khawarij and Belief Of Muslims: In order to fend off criticism levelled against Wahhabism the proponents of this Khariji sect have argued: 1) the Najd of Prophet’s (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) time is not the modern Najd, 2) and Najd known to Prophet’s (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is Iraq or intended meaning of Najd was Iraq. Contrary to Wahhabi claim the Muslims believe Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is in East of Madinah and at very least compromises of large region surrounding Saudi capital Riyadh. We also believe that Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his Khariji minions emerged from Najd and they are the group of Satan referred in the Hadith by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Establishing What Is Fundamental Requirement For The Case Of Ahle Sunnat: There is no need to figure out the entire historical region of Najd because it will not serve any serious objective. Aim would be to establish – Najd; known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) included region surrounding Saudi capital of Riyadh. With this the position of Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat will be established that Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is in east of Madinah and Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his group emerged from this very Najd. Note the very reason the Wahhabi’s believe Iraq is Najd is because they wish to establish the Wahhabi sect did not originate from a place about which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said group of Satan will emerge from it. So if it can establish Wahhabi sect originated from a region of Arabia which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and his companions considered Najd it will defeat the very purpose of shift of Najd from Arabia to Iraq. The Najd of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam): Hadith records Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) sent cavalry to capture Thumama bin Uthal from Najd who was chief of Banu Hanifa, Hadith: “Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle sent some horse men to Najd and they brought a man called Thumama bin Uthal from Bani Hanifa. They fastened him to one of the pillars of the mosque.” [Ref: Bukhari, B8, H458] Another Hadith states he was chief of Al Yamama: “Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Messenger sent horsemen to Najd and they arrested and brought a man called Thumama bin Uthal, the chief of Yamama,[3] and they fastened him to one of the pillars of the Mosque. When Allah's Apostle came up to him; he asked, "What have you to say, O Thumama?" He replied, "I have good news, O Muhammad!" Abu Huraira narrated the whole narration which ended with the order of the Prophet "Release him!" [Ref: Bukhari, B41, H604] From this Hadith it is established that Bani Hanifa are situated in the region of Al Yamama and Al Yamama is in Najd. Now if we can locate Al Yamama we have at least discovered a part of Najd which was known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Al Yamama And Bani Hanifa East Of Madinah: It is apparent from last map that Najd is in direction of East from Madinah. The Saudi capital Riyadh can be seen in the last map spelt Riad and underneath it Yemamah. In some maps location of Banu Hanifa is also indicated making it easier for the readers to discern the reality of historical Najd. Hadith states Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) sent cavalry into Najd in the region of Al Yamama to arrest a man from Bani Hanifa. From the maps it is evident that cavalry travelled from Madinah to region surrounding Saudi capital Riyadh to arrest this man. Hence at very least region surrounding Riyadh is part of Al Yamama which is part of Najd. Reasonable Assumption Regarding Al Yamama And Najd: The Hadith which mentions Najd as place of origin of group of Satan also has mentioned of Sham and Yemen. These two are major regions made up of large swaths of land and not ten mud hut house villages. In context of this it would be reasonable to assume that Najd also a vast region and not ten mud hut house village. So here is a generously purposed Najd and in it Al Yamama. The green circle represents generously small Al Yamama of Prophet Muhammad’s (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) era and the pink one is to depict generously small Najd known to Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). The birth place of Shaykh an-Najd Al Uyayna and his missionary center Al Dirriyah are even within the boundaries of generously small Al Yamama and even more generously small region of Najd. This establishes Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is in east of Madinah and Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his followers originated from this historical part of Najd. Matter of fact is historical Najd and Al Yamama is vast regions in Arabian Peninsula and the above depictions greatly under depict the historical reality of these regions. Rough Estimation Of Najd In Context Of Modern Najd: In one aspect it was generosity to minimize the region of Najd in above map to bare minimum but on other hand one can feel ted bit of victimization and persecution of Khawarij with this tiny Najd. So the following map is extension of generosity to a wider area so the Khawarij don’t feel they are being unjustly narrowed down to Khariji central – Al Dirriyah. Note this boundary is strictly based on linguistic meaning of Najd (i.e. raised, elevated). Even with this enlargement of Najd, the Khawarij have no reason to celebrate. Hadith has connected Najd with Al Yamama. By identifying the region of Al Yamama in Arabian Peninsula we have identified part of historical Najd. Below is depiction of modern Najd – with Al Yamama and Riyadh illustrated - roughly: If one accepts the mini pink depiction of Najd or lingusitical Najd or modern Najd, the fact will be - historical Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is in east of Madinah. The Saudi capital Riyadh is situated in the Najd from which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said group of Satan will originate. Purpose Of Riyadh Being Highlighted On Map: Riyadh is being used as a marker to indicate Al Uyaynah which is Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab’s place of birth and Al Dirriyah - the Khariji missionary center. Here is a map depicting connection of Riyadh with these two places: It is apparent that modern province of Najd at least consists of some parts of historical Najd. Even more importantly it is established that Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his Ibleesi minions emerged from part of central Arabia which was known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) as Najd. Hence in light of this fact and other established facts it is established the Wahhabi sect is the group of Satan foretold to originate from Najd. Najd Known To The Prophet Was Iraq Or By Najd Iraq Was Intended: The regions Najd and Iraq were known as two different regions. The Wahhabi belief that Najd: 1) was Iraq, 2) in Iraq, contradict a well established fact - the Miqat for Najd is Qarn Al Manazil and for Iraq it is Dhat Al Irq. Now if Najd was in Iraq then Miqat for both would be same just as Al Yamama is in Najd and Miqat for them is Qarn Al Manazil.Coming to - by Najd Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) intending Iraq because Khawarij emerged from Iraq. Why stop at designating Iraq as Najd if emergence of Khawarij is criteria for a place to be considered Najd? Khawarij in England, Omar Bakri, Anjem Chaudri group, therefore England is Najd and in the East. Khawarij in Syria – the Isis – Syria is Najd and in East. Ali standing in France, pointed to East says; there is army in Pakistan ready to fight enemies of Pakistan, and on another occasion he says; there is army in America ready to fight enemies of America. The description matches there armies in both places, both armies ready to fight enemies, therefore by saying Pakistan Ali intended America because America is East of France. Human being, there is a country called Pakistan in East therefore by Pakistan he meant Pakistan. Aaah stupid person look the description of both armies matches, America is East from France therefore by Pakistan he meant America. What a stupid Wahhabi logic - description matches therefore both countries are one and the same. Description matches therefore Najd is Iraq, but Iraq North and not East, but the description matches therefore East is where Iraq is. This is how a Wahhabi identifies directions and names of places. What a stupid methodology and equally intelligent Wahhabi. Conclusion: Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his sect appeared from the region of Al Yamama. This Al Yamama is part of historical Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and his companions. This establishes that place from which Muhammah bin Abdul Wahhab the leader of group of Satan started his compaign of Takfir and murder of Muslims, is at very least part of historical Najd known to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) as Najd. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi Footnotes: - [1] Hadhrat Ibn Umar (radiallahu ta’ala anhu) narrates that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: "O Allah! Bestow your blessings on our Sham! O Allah! Bestow your blessings on our Yemen." Najdites were part of the gathering and they said: "And also on our Najd." He ignored their request and continued: "O Allah! Bestow your blessings on our Sham! O Allah! Bestow your blessings on our Yemen." Once again the Najdites requested: "O Allah's Apostle! And also on our Najd." Narrator thinks it was third time when Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said in response to their requests: "There is the place of earthquakes and afflictions and from there comes out the side of the head of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H214] In other words Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said there in Najd will appear afflictions and earthquakes and group of Satan. - [2] This was exactly how the Khawarij of earlier times operated, first they accused the Muslims of being polytheists, then legalized their blood, women, and property, then began the whole sale slaughter of Muslims. All this in the name of preaching pure Tawheed and preserving the purity of Tawheed. If you want to see Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab in action, see ISIS in action. Another good example would be Al Shabab in Somalia and TTP in Pakistan. Everything which the ISIS, Al Shabab, TTP do Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab did on bigger, grander scale with more zealatory. Google or Youtube these Wahhabi groups for graphic display of spreading Islam and message of pure Tawheed. Beware, images will be too graphic if you are faint hearted, it will include sharp knife beheadings while shouting, Allahu Akbar! Or executing children while reading long sermon about how Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is great and merciful, and how Islam is peaceful and not spread at the point of sword. - [3] To harmonize the difference, Thumama bin Uthal was chief of tribe of Banu Hanifa which was situated in the area of Al Yamama: “It was narrated from Sa'eed bin Abi Sa'eed that he heard Abu Hurairah say: "The Messenger of Allah sent some horsemen toward Najd, and they brought back a man from Banu Hanifah who was called Thumamah bin Uthal, the chief of the people of Al-Yamamah. Then he was tied to one of the pillars of the Masjid." [Ref: Nisa’i, B8, H713]

Salal alayqum, baee sahib pehli baat toh yeh heh kay qabr par azaan dena nah hee farz heh aur nah hee sunnat e RasoolAllah sallalahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam. Ham sunniyoon ka yeh nazriya nahin kay yeh farz hen ya sunnat. Is ko ijtihad kee rooh say jaiz karar deeya gaya heh. Hadith meh ata heh kay jahan azaan ho shaytaan chalees qaus door bag jata heh ... qabr par azaan is leyeh dee jaati heh kay ... shaytaan bag jahay ga toh murday say sawaloon kay jawab meh asaani hogi. Madad ho ya nah ho, magar kam say kam irada niyat yahi hoti heh kay musalman joh mara heh us kee bakshish ho jahay. Ghaibana Janaza sunnat samaj kar para jata heh, aur zahir heh aap sunnat tehrahen gay toh phir daleel talab hogi kay kis hadith meh is ka sunnat hona sabat hota heh. Agar aap is ko ijtihadi biddat hasanah samaj kar karen toh mujjay is meh kohi harj nazr nahin aata keun kay dua janazah meh ilfaaz mayyitina aur ghaybina kay ilfaaz ata hen ... is leyeh ghaybana janaza kee biddat e hasanah kay tor par gunjaish heh ... magar sunnat samaj kar bilqul nahin. Ek aur tareek say is ka biddat e hasanah hona be sabat nahin hota keun kay yeh sunnat ko maskh keeya jaha raha heh, joh samnay nahin us ka janazah ki pabandi kissi ko nahin. Wesay agar ghaybana janaza jaiz karar deeya jahay toh phir logh gar say keun niklen gar meh hee beth kar ghaybana muhallay walay ka janaza parh lenh ... keun kay ghaybana janaza say sunnat maskh hoti heh is leyeh is ka biddat hona be sabat ho jata heh ... lehaza biddat e hasana maan kar keeya jahay toh phir jaiz bee heh aur biddat e hasanah samaj kar keeya jahay toh sunnat maskh hoti heh is leyeh najaiz be banta heh, aur moobah woh heh joh biddat e hasanah ho aap to biddat e hasanah kay naam ko tasleem nahin kartay biddat e hasanah ijaad karnay ka amal kesay kar leeya?

Wah ray Wahhabi, Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala asman kee taraf heh toh tum nay uppar ka ishara kar deeya. Khoob, bot khoob. Pehlay yeh samaj loh kay asman nay zameen ko ahatay meh leeya huwa heh. Abh joh zameen kee taraf jahan khara heh us ka uppar mukhtalif hoga. Yehni joh tumara uppar heh woh kissi aur ka neechay hoga, aur joh kissi aur ka neechayheh woh kissi aur ka uppar hoga, yeh tumari madad kay leyeh: Abh bataho, Allah kis taraf heh ... agar asman kee taraf heh toh tum nay uppar keun ishara keeya? Kia asman sirf tumaray sar kay uppar kee taraf heh? Asman kee ek taraf ishara kar kay [yehni joh tumara uppar heh] tum nay Allah ko asman kee ek taraf muqayyid/imprison kar deeya aur baqiyoon kee taraf say azaad kar deeya. Allah kohi enak wala jinn toh nahin joh tum nay apnay uppar kee simt meh qedh kar deeya. Bewaqoof banday Allah ko simt o jehat meh qed kar rahay ho, Allah tumari qedoon say paak heh, musalman ho jaho. Quran parra toh heh magar halq say neechay nahin utra. Mujjay ek waqia yaad aya joh is kay mutalliq heh, ek Wahhabi nay mujjay kaha Allah uppar heh aur ishara asman kee taraf keeya ... meh nay kaha kohi daleel. us nay woh zaeef ghulam larki wali hadith pesh kee jis nay asman kee taraf ishara keeya ... meh nay kaha is larki nay asman kee taraf ishara nahin keeya balkay apnay sar say uppar ishara keeya heh, kehnay laga yaar baat wohi heh sar say upar asman kee taraf huwa nah, ... meh nay kaha toh toh muttafiq heh kay us nay sar say uppar ishara keeya .... us nay kaha han, meh nay kaha likh deh, jab us nay likha ... meh nay kaha tumara dawah heh kay sar say uppar asman kee taraf ishara keeya ... kehnay laga han, meh nay kaha tum ishara kar kay bataho kis taraf banta heh ... akhar us nay asman kee taraf ishara keeya ... meh nay kaha acha yeh tumara sar say uppar heh zeroori nahin kay mera sar ka uppar yahi ho, dekho, meh gas par let'h gaya aur kaha mera sar kay uppar toh east heh aur tumara toh North heh ... aur agar meh sar kay bal khara ho jahoon toh meray sar say upar toh south hoga ... tum bataho Allah kis uppar kee taraf heh. kehnay laga yaar us larki nay toh asman kee taraf ishara keeya thah ... meh nay kaha meh leyta hoon toh meray sar kay uppar kee janab bee toh asman heh, peet peechay asman heh, moon kay agay asman heh. pans gaya. Meh nay kaha chal yeh bata larki nay kis taraf ishara keeya thah us nay phir uppar ishara keeya, meh nay kaha laalay, yeh toh tera uppar heh tooh toh UK meh khara heh joh dunya kay top heh, woh toh middle east meh khari thee, us ka uppar toh aur thah. Meh nay us ko yeh tasweek dikhahi: Meh nay bola, is tasweer ko agar dunya kay oppar super impose keeya jahay, abh tooh toh UK meh khara heh is leyeh tera ishara toh Zenith kee taraf joh uppar heh us taraf heh, magar woh larki toh middle east meh thee is leyeh us ka ishara is tasweer kay mutabiq north banta heh ... mujjay yeh bata kay tumara sar say uppar kee taraf Allah heh? ya har ek insaan kay uppar kee taraf Allah heh? ya sirf Makkah/Madinah say joh uppar kee direction heh us uppar kee taraf Allah heh? Kehnay laga har insaan kay uppar joh asman heh us taraf. meh nay kaha kohi daleel, kehnay laga wohi larki wali, meh nay kaha yeh toh tum nay qiyas keeya kay us kay uppar heh toh tumaray uppar kee taraf Allah heh. Kehnay laga Allah asman kee taraf heh is leyeh meray sar kay upar be asman heh is wastay, Meh nay bola aray shareef banday mujjay yeh bata asman toh insaan, janwar, sab kay uppar heh phir tumara ek hee direction kee taraf ishara karna darust kesay huwa. Agar tum ek taraf ishara kartay ho toh zahir baat heh kehtay ho kay baqi simt nahin. Agar meh poochoon lahor kidr heh toh tum ek taraf ishara karo toh mafoom yahi heh nah kay udhar heh is ka matlab yeh toh nahin hoga nah kay har taraf heh ... yehni jistera ishara keeya jata heh kissi kay honay ka us ko makhsoos keeya jata heh usee simt. Tum nay toh Allah joh har simt heh makhsoos ek simt meh kar deeya ... ishara kar kay, tum kesay musalman ho. Meh nay kaha chalo mujjay yeh bataho larki nay uppar ishara keun keeya kehnay laga uppar asman heh is leyeh, meh nay kaha baee asman toh tumaray moon aur us kay moon aur tumari qamr aur us ki qamr kee taraf be thah us kay sirf uppar ishara keeya, mujjay bataho kia asman sirf uppar hee heh ya joh tumaray samnay aur peechay heh woh be asman heh ... kehnay laga yar sab asman heh magar us nay ishara uppar keeya thah, meh nay poocha, toh phir Allah saray asman kee janab heh ya joh tumaray sar kay uppar asman heh us janib ... kehnay laga larki nay sar kay uppar ishara keeya thah, meh nay kaha toh phir sirf sar kay uppar heh joh moon kay samnay asman nazr aa raha heh us taraf Allah nahin phir? kehnay laga Allah asman par heh toh zahir bat heh udhar be heh ... meh nay bola phir kia uppar uppar kee baq baq laga rakhi thee ... jab sirf uppar nahin samnay upar neechay har simt kee taraf heh toh uppar uppar ka shor kia laga rakha heh ... Allah ko kissi ek jehat kee taraf muqayyid karna kufr sari heh, toba karo aur musalman ho jaho. Kehnay laga yaar behas meh par kar pata lagta heh musalman be nahin maroon ga.

Article Reworked - Corrections And Rephrased Sentences. Introduction: Wahhabi’s believe the Ahadith which indicate east as the direction and province of Najd as place of emergence of group of Satan/Khawarij are about Iraq. In contradiction to their belief, the Muslims believe the vast majority of adherents of early Khawarij were from Arabia – from the sub-tribes of Banu Rabia and Banu Mudhar. One will question – why does a Wahhabi believe those Ahadith are about Iraq? Answer is, Wahhabi’s and their Wahhabism emerged from Najd, fulfilling all the conditions which identify them as a Khariji sect, so to do damage control they declared the Ahadith of Najd/east were in reality about Iraq/north. To decide between position of Muslims and their opponent the Wahhabi’s it is important to take into account the Hadith of - group of Satan is to emerge from the direction of sunrise. If one is living in Madinah and sees the sun rising from the direction of Iraq then applying the Hadith of east/sunrise to Iraq would be acceptable. If it is not possible to see the runrise from Iraq while standing in Madinah then application of east/sunrise Ahadith to Iraq is a innovation which takes to hell-fire. Group Of Satan Is Sect Of Kufr: Regarding Khawarij (i.e. group of Satan) Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “... Messenger of Allah remarked: The summit of unbelief is towards the East and the pride and conceitedness is found among the owners of horses and camels who are rude and uncivil, people of the tents, and tranquillity is found among those who rear goats and sheep.” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H87] In another Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “Narrated 'Abdullah: The Prophet stood up and delivered a sermon, and pointing to 'Aisha's house, he said thrice, "Affliction (will appear from) here," and, "from the side, where Satan's head will come out." [Ref: Bukhari, B53, H336] He was precisely pointing toward region of Riyadh, which is toward central Arabian province of Najd, read. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) came out of Hadhrat Aysha’s (radiallah ta’ala anha) house and while pointing toward east said: “Ibn Umar reported that Allah's Messenger came out from the house of 'A'isha and said: It would be from this side that there would appear the height of unbelief, viz. where appear the groups of Satan.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6941] This establishes Khawarij are Kuffar. Group Of Satan Appearing From Direction Of Sunrise: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was making dua for Yemen and Sham. Amongst the gathering people of Najd were present they requested that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) also make dua for Najd but Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) refused and said he will not make dua for Najd because group of Satan will emerge from Najd: "The People said, "And also on our Najd." He said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham (north)! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The people said, "O Allah's Apostle! And also on our Najd." I think the third time the Prophet said, "There (in Najd) is the place of earthquakes and afflictions and from there comes out the side of the head of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H214] Najd is east of Madinah and Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “Narrated Ibn 'Umar: I heard Allah's Apostle while he was facing the East, saying, "Verily! Afflictions are there, from the side where group of Satan will come out." [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H213] In another Hadith it is recorded Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “Narrated Salim's father: The Prophet stood up beside the pulpit and said, "Afflictions are there! Afflictions are there, from the side where group of Satan will come out," or said, "... the side of the sun (rise) ..." [Bukhari, B88, H212] Both are possible, if Prophet (sallallalahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “Afflictions are there, from the side where group of Satan will come out.”, this is supported Hadith and if he said: “Afflictions are there from the side of the sunrise!”, this also is supported by evidence. He reportedly has said: “Abu Huraira said: I heard the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon him) saying: There came the people of Yemen, they are tender of feelings and meek of hearts. The belief is that of the Yemenites, the sagacity is that of the Yemenites, the tranquillity is among the owners of goats and sheep, and pride and conceitedness is among the uncivil owners of the camels, the people of the tents in the direction of sunrise.” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H91] So far we have established from direction of east, the direction of sunrise, from the province of Najd group of Satan will emerge and the people of sunrise/east are uncivil owners of camels. The following hadith establishes people of east/sunrise are merciless and they are preoccupied with their camels and pay no attention to religion and group of Satan will appear from their direction: "True belief is Yemenite yonder but sternness and mercilessness are the qualities of those who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to the Religion where the two sides of the group of Satan will appear. Such qualities belong to the tribe of Rabi`a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, Bo54, H521] This conclusively establishes the group of Satan is to emerge from east of Madinah in province of Najd from the direction of sunrise. Extremities Of Sunrise And Sunsetting: The following image explains the diagram used on suncalc website, image: Please do click on the link provided above. Then slide the time bar from zero to twenty. As the time changes so does the position of the sun. Next cycle the date from 1st January to 1st of every month in any year and note the place of sunrise and sunset change. You will also note that position of sunrise/sunset does not exceed the yellow arch but moves from south to north and back to south and then back to north, cycle continues. By zooming in and out of the map you will see precise locations of sunrise and sunset as well as general direction of sunrise/sunset. Sunrise And Sunset From Madinah: The following images point to position of sunrise and sunset during different months of 2014. Note every month the place of sunrise/sunset changes, note the change of dates on the images. The following picture displays the northern boundary of sunrise: Conclusion: This establishes it is impossible for one living in Madinah to see the sunrising from the direction of Iraq and it is obvious that sunrises from Yemen and between Riyadh and Buraydah region of Arabian peninsula. Hence the Ahadith which say the group of Satan will emerge from east from the direction of sunrise and from Najd cannot be referring to Iraq but they are about Najd which is precisely east from city of Madinah. The only fully fledged faction to emerge from east, as a sect, from the direction of sunrise, and from the province of Najd, from al Uyayna and al Dirriyah, fulfilling all the conditions which help the Muslims to identify them as group of Satan (i.e. Khawarij) are Wahhabi’s. This is the group of Kufr about which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said, the summit of Kufr is in east [of Madinah]. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi

wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen.

Allah kay bandoon par be kohi court order nahin kay woh zeroor jawab denh, ... aur khaas baat, Allah ka wali joh kartay hen bi iznihi ta'ala kartay hen, jab Allah bey niyaaz heh aur chahay toh deh aur chahay nah deh, toh woh bey niyaaz Allah chahay toh wali e kamil ko izn deh kay jawab doh aur chahay nah deh, ... Ghaws e azam makhlooq aur woh Khaliq, Isa alayhis salam makhlooq aur woh Khaliq ... baat barabari ki nahin baat principle kee heh ... jistera Allah par kohi pabandi nahin kay woh tummeh hidayat deh is'see tara Allah kay waliyoon par be kohi pabandi nahin kay woh tummeh ya mujjay jawab denh, keun kay masla izn e illahi ka heh jab woh chahay ga izn deh ga wali ko ... Tum nay joh likha heh kay Allah chahay toh jawab deh aur chahay toh nah deh yeh sarasar ghalat aur gumrahi heh. Yeh baat meri bari ghor o fikr say perna. Ho tum Wahhabi is waja say tawako nahin kay samjoh gay. Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala kabi kissi ko kissi kay sawal ka direct jawab nahin deta:"And it is not for any human being that Allah should speak to him except by revelation or from behind a partition or that He sends a messenger to reveal, by His permission, what He wills. Indeed, He is Most High and Wise." [Ref: 42:51] Yeh Allah kay leyeh muhaal* heh kay direct jawab deh. Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala jawab ba zariya e Nabi aur Wahi deta heh. Shahid toh kaho kay Allah kay leyeh zeroori nahin kay woh direct jawab deh woh kissi waseeleh yehni khawab ya esa asbab peda kar sakta heh kay kissi Aalim say mila kar jawab puncha denh. Wesay toh yeh bilqul darust heh kay Allah hidayat wasail kay zariyeh deta heh. Magar is context meh direct baat ho rahi heh kay direct Allah say jawab lena. Aap nay bi direct Shaykh Abdul Qadir Al Jilaani rahimullah alayhi ta'ala kay mutaliq kaha thah kay un say jawab leh loh, yaad heh nah, yeh direct ka thah. Is'see kay context meh, meh nay be Allah say direct Allah say sawal ka likha thah ... is leyeh yahan par ba zariya e wasail baat nahin ho rahi balkay direct, aur tum nay direct kay mutaliq likha kay Allah directly jawab deh ya nah deh yeh us kee marzi heh. Agay, kia Allah chah sakta heh kay woh jawab deh? Abh agar aap ko Allah nay jawab dena ho toh phir Allah aap kay wastay Nabi behjna paray ga keun kay Allah khud toh jawab deh ga nahin. Abh agar Nabi behijta heh toh phir khatamun Nabiyeen wali ayaat kay khilaaf hoga aur Allah apnay waday kay khilaaf be nahin karta. Aur is say bar waja ... Allah jab chahta heh toh kehta heh hoja toh woh jaati heh: "Verily, His command, when He intends a thing, is only that He says to it, “Be!”– and it is!" [Surah Yasin:82] Alhasil agar Allah jawab dena chahay toh Nabi behjna parta heh, is waja say Allah chah hee nahin sakta, keun kay jissay chahay ussay kehta heh hoja.Is leyeh aap kay sawal ka jawab dena chahna possible meh nahin. Tum yeh mantay ho kay Allah tummaray sawal ka jawab dena chah sakta heh aur meh manta hoon kay Allah jawab dena chah hee nahin sakta. Lamba kissa mukhtasar, tum nay likha kay Allay chay toh jawab deh chahay nah deh, yeh ghalat heh keun kay tum nay jawab kay denay ko jaiz mana aur nah denay ko be jaiz mana, aur qaid lagahi kay Allah chahay toh. Aur is ka rad yeh heh kay Allah joh chahta heh ussay kehta heh hoja aur woh ho jaati heh, is leyeh muhaal heh Allah ka tumaray sawal ka jawab dena chahna. Footnote: * meri muraad muhaal fitrati nahin, yehni woh muhaal nahin kay Allah kee qudrat say bahir ho, misaal kay tor par Allah ka apnay aap ko fana karna yeh Allah kay leyeh muhaal fitrati heh, Allah ka apnay walden ka naam batana muhaal fitrati heh, keun kay esa ho hi nahin sakta. Is jaga meri murad woh muhaal heh joh Allah kay kuch farmanay kay baad lazam ahay. Yehni Allah nay farmaya kay Allah kay Rasool Khatam un Nabiyeen hen, abh Allah apnay leyeh muhaal ker leeya kay aynda kohi Nabi behjay.

Salam, Jistera tum keh rahay ho Istera toh Allah be jawab nah deh. Joh shehrag say be ziyada qareeb aur hamesha zinda thah heh rahay ga, har cheese sunta janta heh woh be istera jawab nahin deta, yaqeen nah ahay toh pooch kar dekh loh mang kar dekh loh. Jab Allah joh Malik heh Awliyah e Kamileen ka aur AwliyahAllah jis kay tabay hen, toh phir woh kesay deh saktay hen?

Narrated Muhammad bin `Amr bin `Ata': I was sitting with some of the companions of Allah's Messenger () and we were discussing about the way of praying of the Prophet. Abu Humaid As-Sa`idi said, "I remember the prayer of Allah's Messenger () better than any one of you. I saw him raising both his hands up to the level of the shoulders on saying the Takbir; and on bowing he placed his hands on both knees and bent his back straight, then he stood up straight from bowing till all the vertebrate took their normal positions. In prostrations, he placed both his hands on the ground with the forearms away from the ground and away from his body, and his toes were facing the Qibla. On sitting In the second rak`a he sat on his left foot and propped up the right one; and in the last rak`a he pushed his left foot forward and kept the other foot propped up and sat over the buttocks." [bukhari, Vol. 1, Book 12, Hadith 79] One hadith that comes to my mind is; He raised his hands once in the beginning. Some narrated: (raised his hands) once only." [Ref: Abu Dawood, Boook 2, Hadith 748] It was narrated that 'Uqbah bin 'Amir said: "Shall I not show you how I saw the Messenger of Allah () pray?" We said: "Yes." So he stood up and when he bowed, he placed his palms on his knees and put his fingers behind his knees, and held his arms out from his sides, until every part of him settled. Then he raised his head and stood up until every part of him settled. Then he prostrated and held his arms out from his sides, until every part of him settled. Then he sat up until every part of him settled. Then he prostrated again until every part of him settled. Then he did four rak'ahs like that. Then he said: "This is how I saw the Messenger of Allah () pray, and this is how he used to lead us in prayer." (Hasan) [Ref: Sunan Nisa'i, Vol. 2, Book 12, Hadith 1038] Narrated Wa'il ibn Hujr: I witnessed the Prophet (ﷺ) raise his hands in front of his ears when he began to pray. I then came back and saw them (the people) raising their hands up to their chest when they began to pray. They wore long caps and blankets. [Abu Dawood: Book 3, Hadith 727] Jabir b. Samurah said:The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) entered upon us while the people were raising their hands. The narrator Zubair said: I think( they were raising the hands) during prayer. He (the prophet) said: What is the matter, I see you raising your hands as if they are the tails of restive horses! Maintain tranquility during prayer. [abu Dawood: Book 2, Hadith 995] Narrated Abdullah ibn Mas'ud: Alqamah said: Abdullah ibn Mas'ud said: Should I pray in the way the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) had performed it? He said: He prayed, raising his hands. [Abu Dawood, Book 3, Hadith 747] Alqamah narrated that: Abdullah bin Mas'ud said: "Shall I not demonstrate the Salat of Allah's Messenger to you?" Then he offered Salat and he did not raise his hands except while saying the first Takbir." [Tirmadhi, Vol. 1, Book 2, Hadith 257]

------------------Duplicated post deleted on Author request----------------

Hokam aam kee tashri kee jaati heh, jistera Allah kay Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam) ka farmaan heh qullu muhdasatin bidda ... har new ijaad biddat heh ... yeh hokam aam heh agar aam ko qahim rakha jahay toh phir Quran meh zer zabr bukhari, muslim abu dawood, sab biddat o zalalat banti hen. Ahle ilm o aqal samajtay hen kay aam ko khaas keeya jata heh ... is aam ko khaas keeya gaya ... har woh amr joh talimat e deen kay rooh kay khilaaf heh woh biddat heh ... abh is takhsees say wazia huwa kay new ijaad hona bura biddat nahin balkay new ijaad ho kar deen ki rooh kay khilaf hona biddat heh. Aap ko samjana yeh thah kay aam ko khaas keeya jata heh ... Mufti Sahib rehmatulllah alayhi ta'ala ka fatwah hokam aam heh is meh takhsees nahin pahi jaati. Jistera soowar khana haram heh aur haram ko khana mana aur sakht gunna heh. Abh agar kissi kee jaan bhook ki waja say khatray meh pari heh toh kia phir bi us ka soowar khana us ko man-na heh? Shari tor par, fiqha ka masla heh kay bhook kee waja say agar jaan janay ka khatra ho aur soowar ka ghost mayyasir ho toh kha sakta heh aur kohi gunna nahin hoga. Is'see tara imaan bachanay kee khatir misl e soowar kitab pari ja sakti heh agar apna imaan aur auroon ka imaan bachanay kee niyyat ho. Niyyat ho kay joh is kay kufriat hen un ko biyan karoon ga aur logoon ko imaan bacha hoon ga. Abh agar kohi in kitaboon ko zariya aur wasta e hidayat man kar parta heh toh phir haram par amal karta heh aur gunna gar heh aur joh kohi apna aur auroon ka imaan bachanay kee khatir parta heh toh jaiz heh.

Introduction: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) foretold about the emergence of Khawarij from East[1] – from the direction of Arabian province of Najd.[2] He also foretold there will be two groups of Khawarij[3] to emerge from East with shaven heads.[4] About one he specificly said they will appear near the end of time - in the time of Dajjal[5] and join his forces against Muslims. The first major Khariji sect had it’s ranked filled with Arabs who had marched from Najd to Iraq. Most of them belonged to the sub-tribes of two main tribes banu Rabia and Mudhar. The second major sect of Khawarij to arise from Najd what we know today as Wahhabism. The man power of this Khariji sect also came from two tribes of Rabia and Mudhar. The Prophet’s (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) mentioning of direction and name of place of emergence of Khariji sect is a thorn in the eyes of Wahhabi’s. As such they resorted to distort those Ahadith which identify Najd/East as place from where group of Satan will emerge. They argue Khawarij emerged from Iraq therefore Najd is Iraq or in Iraq and they argue the intended east of the Ahadith toward the direction of Iraq. The basis of their these beliefs is logic and not scriptural evidence. Please refer to the following article to get a detail refutation of their logical dediction: ‘Hadith Distortion Series – Dajjal Is To Emerge From East And He Will Come From Iraq Therefore Intended East Is Iraq.’ Referr to footnote two to get the gist of their logic and then referr to following part of article: ‘Bring Forward Your Proof If You Are Truthful.’ In the mentioned section their logic is refuted with logical deductions which cannot be acceptable to any Muslim. In this article the logic behind their belief will be refuted uniquely, in sha allah subhanahu wa ta’ala. Wahhabi Logic – Iraq Is East Of Madinah: A Wahhabi argued Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “It was narrated that Jabir said: “The Messenger of Allah addressed us and said: ‘The Talbiyah of the people of Al-Madinah begins at Dhul-Hulaifah. The Talbiyah of the people of Sham begins at Juhfah. The Talbiyah of the people of Yemen begins at Yalamlam. The Talbiyah of the people of Najd begins at Qarn. The Talbiyah of the people of the east begins at Dhat ‘Irq.’ Then he turned to face the (eastern) horizon and said: ‘O Allah, make their hearts steadfast.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B25, H2915] He quoted Hadith which stated Dhat Al Irq is place of wearing for those coming from Iraq: “Abu Zubair heard Jabir b. 'Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) as saying as he was asked about (the place for entering upon the) state of Ihram: I heard (and I think he carried it directly to the Apostle of Allah) him saying: For the people of Medina Dhu'l-Hulaifa is the place for entering upon the state of Ihram, and for he people coming through the other way (i. e. Syria) it is Juhfa; for the people of Iraq it is Dhat al-'Irq; for the people uf Najd it is Qarn (al-Manazil) and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.” [Ref: Muslim, B7, H2666] Then he concluded – you see the place of wearing Ihram for people of east is Dhat Al Irq and Iraqi’s wear Ihram from Dhat Al Irq therefore Iraq is in East. Refuting Heretical Wahhabi Logic With Logic: Z says: Planes entering British airspace from east direct them to London Gatwick airport. Y: Those planes coming from Northern Ireland also land them at Gatwick airport. Wahhabi: Planes from east are landing at Gatwick airport and planes from Northern Ireland are landing from Gatwick – place of plane landing is same - logic dictates Northern Ireland is in EAST. You see, logic is very bad tool to interpret two statements, especially if they are being used to determin geographical locations or directions. Anyone who has looked at a map will not arrive at conclusion that Northern Ireland is in east. In comparable fashion, Dhat Al Irq being the place of assuming Ihram for people Iraqi and for people of east has got nothing do with Iraq being in east of prophetic city of Madinah. Bottom line is geographical maps should be used to understand where Iraq not logic. Here is a depiction of Iraq in relationship to Arabian Peninsula. Note on this map straight lines northern, southern, eastern, and western borders have been drawn to enhance the actual location of Iraq in relationship to Arabia and also note the green and the yellow lines meet on the centre of Arabia depending on where it was drawn from. Just from looking at the map above it would be obvious to everyone that Iraq is North of Saudi Arabia and not even remotely to its east. The lands of ancient Khurasan comprimises of parts of Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and it has been stated as a land in the east: “It was narrated that Abu Bakr Siddiq said: "The Messenger of Allah told us: 'Dajjal will emerge in a land in the East called Khorasan, and will be followed by people with faces like hammered shields.'" [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, same Hadith: H4072]“Abu Bakr As-Siddiq said: "The Messenger of Allah narrated to us, saying: 'The Dajjal shall emerge from a land in the East called Khurasan. He is followed by a people whom appear as if their f aces are shields coated with leather.'" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B7, H2237] In addition to this countries such as Pakistan, India, China, and Bangladesh are in the direction of East, Iraq is up North. Dhat Al Irq was nominated as place of assuming Ihram for easterners because Hujjaj from east of mentioned countries would use the land route of Iraq to perform Hajj. Those who would land on eastern sea shore of Arabian peninsula would have to use Qarn Al Manazil as place of wearing Ihram because they approach Makkah from direction of Najd. Conclusion: Iraq is north from Arabia and cannot be legitimately be taken as land in the east. East is toward the province of Najd about which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said group of Satan will emerge from it. Wama alayna ilal balalghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi Footnotes: - [1] “Narrated Ibn 'Umar: I heard Allah's Apostle while he was facing the East, saying, "Verily! Afflictions are there, from the side where head of Satan will come out." [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H213] - [2] “Narrated Ibn 'Umar: (The Prophet) said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." The Prophet again said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." They said again, "Our Najd as well." On that the Prophet said, "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, B17, H147] - [3] Tribes of Rabia and Mudhar are situated in region surrounding Riyadh and in the Arabian province of Najd, the Hadith states: “Verily Iman is towards this side, and harshness and callousness of the hearts is found amongst the rude owners of the camels who drive them behind their tails (to the direction) where emerge the two groups of Satan, they are the tribes of Rabi'a and Mudar.” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H83] This establishes emergance of two Khariji groups from Najd which is East of Madinah. - [4] “Narrated `Uqba bin `Umar and Abu Mas`ud: Allah's Messenger pointed with his hand towards Yemen and said, "True Belief is Yemenite yonder but sternness and mercilessness are the qualities of those who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to the Religion where the two sides of the group of Satan will appear. Such qualities belong to the tribe of Rabi`a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, Bo54, H521] Banu Rabia and Banu Mudhar were situated in the direction of east from Madinah: “Sahl b. Hunaif reported Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There would arise from the east a people with shaven heads.” [Ref: Muslim, B5, H2338] This establishes there will be two groups of Satan emerging from East from direction of Najd with shaven heads. - [5] It is stated in Hadith:“Abu Sa'id al-Khudri said that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) made a mention of a sect that would be among his Ummah which would emerge out of the dissension of the people. Their distinctive mark would be shaven heads. They would be the worst creatures or the worst of the creatures. The group who would be nearer to the truth out of the two would kill them.” [Ref: Muslim, B5, H2324] The dissention/disagreement mentioned in the Hadith was between Hadhrat Ali (radiallah ta’ala anhu) and Hadhrat Amir Muawiyah (radiallah ta’ala anhu). Khawarij emerged when both of them agreed to peace terms but the Khawarij from Hadhrat Ali’s (radiallah ta’ala anhu) side rebelled against his this decision and delcared him Mushrik and Kafir. They distanced from the army of Hadhrat Ali (radiallah ta’ala anhu) and camped seperatly. They were identifiable from Hadhrat Ali’s (radiallah ta’ala anhu) army due to their excessively shaven heads. The second group emerged in the 17th century from Najd almost identical to the first one in sense of barbarity, Takfir, rebellion, slaughter of Muslims, as well as having man power from sub-tribes of Banu Rabia/Mudhar, and placed excessive emphasis on extreme shaving of head until the Ulama used the Hadith of shaven head sect to indentify Wahhabi’s as Khariji’s. Then Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab put a stop to this practice. The following Hadith referrs to this second manifestion of Kharijism from Najd: “A people will come at the end of time; as if he is one of them (i.e. Muslims), reciting the Qur'an without it passing beyond their throats. They will go through Islam just as the arrow goes through the target. Their distinction will be shaving. They will not cease to appear until the last of them comes with Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal. So when you meet them, then kill them, they are the worst of created beings." [Ref: Nasai, Vol5, B37, H4108]

Introduction: First group of the Khawarij was powered by members of Banu Mudhar and Banu Rabia. Sub-tribes belonging to these two major tribes filled the ranks of Khawarij. Both these tribes were situated in central Arabia – in the province of Najd. Their members marched from Arabia into Iraq and in there they created fitna which resulted in the first official sect – named Khawarij. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) foretold that from east the group of Satan will emerge. The due east of Prophetic Madinah was toward Saudi capital Riyadh, where ancient Najd province is located. About this Najd Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said group of Satan will emerge from it. The first Khariji sect and it’s second major manifestation emerged in the form of Wahhabism from area surrounding modern Saudi capital Riyadh. Due to the first sect of Khawarij emerging from Iraq the Wahhabi’s distort the natural meaning of Ahadith to force fit them onto Iraq, saying east of Madinah is toward Iraq. Qualities Of Inhabitants Of East Form Where Group Of Satan Will Emerge: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reportedly have said: “It is narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessings be upon him) remarked: The height of unbelief is towards the East and the pride and conceitedness is found among the owners of horses and camels who are rude and uncivil, people of the tents, and tranquillity is found among those who rear goats and sheep.” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H87] In another Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reported to have said about people of east – Rabi and Mudhar: “Narrated Abi Mas'ud: The Prophet said, "From this side from the East, afflictions will appear. Rudeness and lack of mercy are characteristics of the rural bedouins who are busy with their camels and cows (and pay no attention to religion). Such are the tribes of Rabi'a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, B56, H702] Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) also said: “It is reported on the authority of Jabir b. Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and, blessings be upon him) observed: The callousness of heart and sternness is in the East and faith is among the people of the Hijaz (i.e. West).” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H95] In one Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) described the people who would appear from east with shaven heads: “Sahl b. Hunaif reported Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: There would arise from the East a people with shaven heads.” [Ref: Muslim, B5, H2338] This group is also decribed by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) as group of Satan: “Narrated Ibn 'Umar: I heard Allah's Apostle while he was facing the East, saying, "Verily! Afflictions are there, from the side where group of Satan will come out." [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H213] This is also attested by: “Ibn Umar reported: I heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying while pointing his hands towards the East: The turmoil would appear from this side; verily, the turmoil would appear from this side (he repeated it thrice) where appear the group of Satan.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6942] Ahadith pertaining to emergence of tribulations and group of Satan from east are mutwatir – therefore possibility of inaccurate report is out the window. Najd is in east of Madinah and about Najd Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said group of Satan will emerge from it: “Narrated Ibn 'Umar: (The Prophet) said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." The Prophet again said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." They said again, "Our Najd as well." On that the Prophet said, "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the group of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, B17, H147] Ahle Sunnat’s Position Based On The Evidence Presented: 1) Riyadh area is perfectly due east of Madinah and it is situated in historical Najd, 2) Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) described the mentioned the qualities of Banu Rabia and Banu Mudhar has lacking mercy, busy with camels and cows – other words pay no attention to learning proper teaching of Islam.[1] Banu Mudhar/Rabia were situtated in form of sub-tribes in central Arabia, area surrounding Saudi capital Riyadh, and up toward Iraq border. 3) Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) pointed toward the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) while standing besides the pulpit of Masjid Nabvi (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and said: group of Satan will emerge from this direction. This is precise direction leading to region surrounding Riyadh. 4) Najd is in province of Arabia and not Iraq. These four reasons establish the belief of Ahle Sunnat that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was pointing toward the region surrounding Saudi capital Riyadh and not Iraq. Wahhabi Position Based On Their Distortions Of Factual Information: Khawarij emerged from Iraq therefore Ahadith which say group of Satan will emerge from East means Iraq is direction of East. Prophetic Ahadith indicating emergence of Khawarij from Najd mean Khawarij will emerge from Iraq because Khawarij emerged from Iraq.[2] Bring Forward Your Proof If You Are Truthful: One Wahhabi I challenged to establish his position with evidence that Iraq is East of Madinah he quoted the following Hadith as evidence: “We informed him that he had overcome those in his neighbourhood and they had submitted themselves before him. Thereupon he said to us: Has it actually happened? We said: Yes. Thereupon he said: If it is so that is better for them that they should show obedience to him. I am going to tell you about myself and I am Dajjal and would be soon permitted to get out and so I shall get out and travel in the land, and will not spare any town where I would not stay for forty nights except Mecca and Medina as these two (places) are prohibited (areas) for me and I would not make an attempt to enter any one of these two. An angel with a sword in his hand would confront me and would bar my way and there would be angels to guard every passage leading to it; then Allah's Messenger striking the pulpit with the help of the end of his staff said: This implies Taiba meaning Medina. Have I not, told you an account (of the Dajjal) like this? 'The people said: Yes, and this account narrated by Tamim Dari was liked by me for it corroborates the account which I gave to you in regard to him (Dajjal) at Medina and Mecca. Behold he (Dajjal) is in the Syrian sea (Mediterranean) or the Yemen sea (Arabian sea). Nay, on the contrary, he is in the East, he is in the East, he is in the East, and he pointed with his hand towards the East. I (Fatima bint Qais) said: I preserved it in my mind (this narration from Allah's Messenger.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H7028] Then he proceeded to quote the following Hadith: “Al-'Iryan ibn al-Haytham said, "My father came to Mu'awiya when I was a body. When he reached him, he said, 'Welcome, welcome.' A man was sitting with him on the elevated seat. He said, 'Amir al-Mu'minin, who is this you are welcoming?' He said, 'This is the master of the people of the east. This is al-Haytham ibn al-Aswad.' I asked, 'Who is this?' They replied, 'This is 'Abdullah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'As.' I said to him, 'Abu so-and-so. From where will the Dajjal emerge?' He said, 'I have not seen the people of a town who asked about what is far nor left what is near. You are from the people of a town.' Then he said, 'He will emerge from the land of Iraq with the trees and palm trees.'" [Ref: Al Adab Al Mufrad, B47, H1160] He then proceeded to argue that Dajjal is to appear from east as the Hadith says and second Hadith says Dajjal will appear from Iraq, this establishes Iraq is in east – Khalas (i.e. finish!). His logic brought smile on my face I responded – Khannas, Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) Rauf ar’Raheem (16:7), Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is Rauf ar’Raheem (9:128). Employing similiar logic to yours, Rauf ar’Raheem is Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala), Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is Rauf ar’Raheem, therefore Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). Logic which contradicts established matters of religion of Islam is to be rejected. Neither Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) nor Iraq is east according to the Hadith because both contradict the established facts of deen of Islam. The east which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) referred to is east in the direction of Afghanistan because there are Ahadith which state Dajjal will emerge from east in a land called Khurasan: “It was narrated that Abu Bakr Siddiq said: "The Messenger of Allah told us: 'Dajjal will emerge in a land in the East called Khorasan, and will be followed by people with faces like hammered shields.'" [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H4072] Imam Tirmadhi recorded the same Hadith: “Abu Bakr As-Siddiq said: "The Messenger of Allah narrated to us, saying: 'The Dajjal shall emerge from a land in the East called Khurasan. He is followed by a people whom appear as if their f aces are shields coated with leather.'" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B7, H2237] The land of Khurasan is comprimised of Aghanistan, eastern regions of Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and according to some maps western border of Pakistan are also part of ancient Khurasan – google search images for Khurasan. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) told the Dajjal will be followed by ten thousand Jews from Isfahan, currently in Iran: “Anas b. Malik reported that Allah's Messenger said: The Dajjal would be followed by seventy thousand Jews of Isfahan wearing Persian shawls.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H7034] In short Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) himself explained what he meant by emergence of Dajjal from east – emerging from Khurasan who will be followed by ten thousand Jews of Isfahan. Conclusion: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) foretold about the emergence of Dajjal from east. He also stated in east from the land of Khurasan Dajjal will emerge and will be followed by ten thousand Jews from Isfahan. The Hadith of Dajjal emerging from Iraq is Daeef (i.e. weak) but even if it is taken as a valid evidence it only supports the understanding that Dajjal will emerge from Khurasan will be followed by Isfahani Jews from there he will march into Iraq. After this he will cause tribulation amongst the Muslims of ancient Syria and in the land of Iraq, Hadith: “There are things that I fear more for you than the Dajjal. If he appears while I am among you, I will contend with him on your behalf, and if he appears when I am not among you, then each man must fend for himself, and Allah will take care of every Muslim on my behalf. He (Dajjal) will be a young man with curly hair and a protuberant eye; I liken him to 'Abdul-'Uzza bin Qatan. Whoever among you sees him, let him recite the first Verses of Surat Al-Kahf over him. He will emerge from Khallah, between Sham and Iraq, and will wreak havoc right and left. O slaves of Allah, remain steadfast.' We said: 'O Messenger of Allah, how long will he stay on earth?' He said: 'Forty days, one day like a year, one day like a month, one day like a week, and the rest of his days like your days.' We said: 'O Messenger of Allah, on that day ....” [Ref: Muslim, B36, H4075] Therefore logic infered EAST being Iraq and NAJD being Iraq or in Iraq is baseless. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi Footnotes: - [1] The brutality of Khawarij is established fact - which is sign of lack of mercy. So is their ignorance of Islam – established by the fact that they apply the verses revealed for Kafirs upon Muslims. The first major sect of Khawarij and second major infestation known to us has Wahhabism - both displayed these signs. - [2] A: In African jungle of Kenya there are lions. Z: There were lions in London Zoo. Wahhabi: London is African Kenyan jungle where lions roam. Did you see the logic? Based on logic they made London and it’s Zoo into African country Kenya, worst a jungle. Similarly the Wahhabi logic is – Khawarij will emerge from direction of East in the province of Najd. Khawarij emerged from Iraq in Kufa/Baghdad therefore Najd is in Iraq or Iraq itself. Logically it fits like a glove but geographically its distortion al akbar of factual information.

Emergence Of Satan’s Group From Direction Of Hadhrat Aysha’s House. Introduction: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reported to have said while pointing toward the hose of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) Satans group will emerge from this direction. The Rawafidh employ this Hadith to belittle Um Ul Momineen Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha). The Wahhabi’s on other hand affirm the Hadith but ignore the implication of the Hadith of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam). They believe group of Satan emerged from Iraq therefore Iraq is Najd and not ancient province of Najd in Arabia. Based on this belief of Wahhabi’s it seems they would understand from the Hadith that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed toward the direction of Iraq. Hence there are two real issues which need to be established. 1) Did Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) say Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) is will create group of Satan, or did intend something else, and if it was something else then, what was it? 2) Based on the available information can it be legitimately argued Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed toward the direction of Iraqi cities of Kufa/Baghdad?[1] The readers can answer this question themselves after reading this research material. Methodology Used: The Wahhabi distortion of the Hadith will be discussed in detail. This serve as ground work for explaining the Rawafidhi accusation against the Um Ul Momineen, the beloved wife of our the beloved Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and it will establish toward which direction Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) was pointing precisely – Iraq or ancient province of Najd in central Arabia. This will be followed by brief explanation of the Hadith to refute the Rawafidhi accusation against the mother of pious. Bare Essentials Of Discussion Ahead: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) delivered a sermon: “Narrated 'Abdullah: The Prophet stood up and delivered a sermon, and pointing to 'Aisha's house, he said thrice, "Affliction (will appear from) here," and, "from the side, where Satan's head will come out." [Ref: Bukhari, B53, H336] While standing beside the pulpit of Masjid Nabvi (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam): “Narrated Salim's father: The Prophet stood up beside the pulpit and said, "Afflictions are there! Afflictions are there, from the side where head of Satan will come out," or said: "... the side of the sun ..." [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H212] This establishes two facts, Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) standing beside the pulpit of Masjid Nabvi (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and he pointed toward the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha). These two facts are crucial in proper understanding of which direction he was precisely pointing toward, so please bare these in mind. Pulpit Of Masjid Nabvi And Revealing Direction Prophet Pointed Toward: The original Minbar/pulpit of Masjid Nabvi (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) was not the same as the modern one, please have a look at the following images: Mehrab is the semi circle niche in the mosque. It points the direction of Kabah and commonly it is used by Imam to lead prayers this is why it is also called Musalla. Note the Mehrab of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) differents from Mehrab which is used at present. Next to original Mehrab the Minbar is located on the right hand side if one faces the direction of Qibla. Note grave of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and two companions [marked above as Roza Mubarak] is in the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha). Below the house of Prophet Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) has been pointed out in square circle – indicated as Hujr A’isha, see illustration: Standing next to Mimbar Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed toward the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radialla ta’ala anha). On both images the red arrow points to the direction which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed toward. Fool Proof Method Of Knowing Which Direction The Prophet Pointed: Go to google map and locate Madinah, zoom to the level as displayed on first picture. Roughly mark a point for Mimbar on your monitor and draw a line from that Mimbar point to green dome but on your display monitor – the monitor screen. Then zoom out, now re-adjust the point to your hypothetical spot. Zoom out again then relocate the point. Once Masjid disappears from map start using inner ring road as guide and when that can’t be seen then use outer ring road. Then adjust the point to cityof Madinah eventually you will see the entire map of Arabia. Please note, you will have to zoom out at each step and relocate to points. Here is a video of how it is done, guide. Direction Which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) Pointed Toward: These fourteen pictures perfectly illustrate the direction which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed toward. It was the direction of Saudi capital Riyadh and it was in this direction the famed incient region of Najd is located. Saudi capital Riyadh is located in Najd and all surrounding area is in included in Najd. On the last image one can see the Iraqi city of Basrah on top right corner. Significance Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) Pointing Toward Riyadh: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) was invoking Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) for blessing for Sham and Yemen. In the gathering there were people from Najd he repeated requested that he make dua for Najd as well: “Narrated Ibn 'Umar: (The Prophet) said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." The Prophet again said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." They said again, "Our Najd as well." On that the Prophet said, "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the group of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, B17, H147] Here please see where Najd is located in Arabian Peninsula: Following map pretty accurately depicts historical Najd: Another Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) has reportedly said, group of Satan will emerge from the lands of Rabia and Mudhar: “Narrated `Uqba bin `Umar and Abu Mas`ud: Allah's Messenger pointed with his hand towards Yemen and said, "True Belief is Yemenite yonder but sternness and mercilessness are the qualities of those who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to the Religion where the two sides of the group of Satan will appear. Such qualities belong to the tribe of Rabi`a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, Bo54, H521] Now here is the map depicting where Banu Rabia and Mudhar were situated in Arabia: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) was pointing toward region of Najd which is in East of Madinah. Also this is the region where the tribes of Banu Rabia and Banu Mudhar and their sub-tribes were situated. Hence he was not pointing toward Iraq nor he was pointing to Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) but in fact he was pointing toward the region of ancient Najd in Arabian Peninsula. Answering The Accusation Of Rawafidh: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) was delivering a sermon from the pulpit of Masjid Nabvi (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and said: “Narrated Salim's father: The Prophet stood up beside the pulpit and said, "Afflictions are there! Afflictions are there, from the side where head of Satan will come out," or said: "... the side of the sun ..." [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H212] In this sermon Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed toward the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) and said: “Narrated 'Abdullah: The Prophet stood up and delivered a sermon, and pointing to 'Aisha's house, he said thrice, "Affliction (will appear from) here," and, "from the side, where Satan's head will come out." [Ref: Bukhari, B53, H336] He was pointing toward the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) and from pulpit the house of HadhratAysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) is in direction of East. Another Hadith records Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) stood at the door of Hadhrat Hafsa (radiallah ta’ala anha) and said groups of Satan would appear from this direction. Hadhrat Ubaidullah bin Sa’id (radiallah ta’ala anhu) said he stood at the door of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) and pointed toward east: “Ibn 'Umar reported that Allah's Messenger stood by the door of Hafsa and pointing towards the east, he said: The turmoil would appear from this side, viz. where the groups of Satan would appear, and he uttered these words twice or thrice and Ubaidullah b. Sa'ld in his narration said. The Messenger of Allah had been standing by the door of 'A'isha.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6939] It does not matter where he was standing the fact remains he was pointing toward the direction of east. Hence when he pointed from pulpit toward the direction of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) he only intended to point toward the direction of east not toward Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha). Logical Explanation To Refute The Rawafidh: Prophet pointed toward not at the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) but toward the region of Najd on other side of her house. The narrators mentioned her house to point out the precise direction he was pointing out. If one points to West and says: Obama in the White House is a monster, and a listener narrates it as: He pointed toward Europe and said Obama in the White House is a monster. Anyone familiar with geography of America/Europe will understand that his pointing toward Europe is not because White House is in Europe rather it is in the same direction. Similarly Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed at the direction of Najd by pointing toward her house and the narrator mentioned her house as a guide to direction he was pointing. Coming Back To The Wahhabi’s – Why The Distortion Of Hadith: Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab Najdi at-Tamimi the founder of Wahhabi sect was born not very far from Riyadh in a village called Uyayna. After completing his studies of Kharijism in Iraq he moved to Al Uyayna but due to his continous accusations of Muslims have fallen into Shirk he was forced to migrate to Al Dirriyah. See the map to note where direction of Al Uyayna and Al Dirriyah are: In Al Dirriyah he gained the support of Saud family and established his Wahhabi sect with edicts of Shirk and killing of Muslims, employing similar tactics to ISIS – mass murder of Muslims. His supporters in order to blunt the sword of truth raised by Ahle Sunnat against their Khariji sect have resorted to saying Najd is in Iraq. But the Hadith of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) refutes their distortion and exposes their Wahhabi sect for what it is – a group of Khariji spawns of Iblees. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said about these Khariji’s: “Ibn Umar reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) came out from the house of 'A'isha and said: It would be from this side that there would appear the height of unbelief, viz. where appear the horns of Satan.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H 6941] This group of Kufr is no other group then Wahhabi sect. Saud Family And Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhab – The Sides Of Group Of Satan: The Saud family traces it’s tribal ancestory back to Banu Rabia via Banu Anizzah [alternative spelling Anzah] and Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab’s tribal ancestory goes back to Banu Tamim and to Banu Mudhar. Regarding Banu Mudhar and Banu Rabia Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said: “Narrated Abi Mas'ud: The Prophet said, "From this side from the east, afflictions will appear. Rudeness and lack of mercy are characteristics of the rural bedouins who are busy with their camels and cows. Such are the tribes of Rabi'a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, B56, H702] "True belief is Yemenite yonder but sternness and mercilessness are the qualities of those who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to the Religion where the two sides of the group of Satan will appear. Such qualities belong to the tribe of Rabi`a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, Bo54, H521] Tribes of Rabia and Mudhar have been declared as two sides of groups of Satan. This specific fullfilment of prophesy was when the two tribes Rabia and Mudhar [Banu Tamim and Anizzah] – in other words Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and Saud family came togather to spread Wahhabism. This sect is the mother and the father of all suffering of Muslims. All terrorists, all suicide bombers, all civilian beheaders, all Muslim killers, all rebels in all Muslim countries are Wahhabi. Wherever this sect has gained strenth it has spread tribulation amongst Muslims. All the Prophecies which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) foretold about emergence of Khawarij from Najd were fullfilled by him and his Ibleesi spawns. Conclusion: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) pointed toward the house of Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) to indicate the direction from where the group of Satan will emerge. He was pointing toward ancient Najd where modern Saudi capital Riyadh is situated. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) told of two groups of Satan emerging from the lands of Banu Rabia and Mudhar, evidence: Narrated `Uqba bin `Umar and Abu Mas`ud: Allah's Messenger pointed with his hand towards Yemen and said, "True Belief is Yemenite yonder but sternness and mercilessness are the qualities of those who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to the Religion where the two sides of the group of Satan will appear. Such qualities belong to the tribe of Rabi`a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, Bo54, H521] The first group of Khawarij gathered its man power from Najd and emerged from Iraq as a distinct sect and the second group of Khawarij started from Najd - the land of Banu Rabia and Banu Mudhar. Then due to its missionary activity and active preaching fuelled by Saudi families oil income spread throughout the world. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi Footnotes: - [1] The first distinct group of Khawarij appeared in the cities of Kufa/Baghdad and later in Basrah.

Wahhabi aur deobandi fraud aur jhoot meh ilbees kay ustad hen.

Salam alayqum, Meray baee Allah ta'ala ham say kay imaan o amal o ishq ko salamat rakhay. Meray baee meh mazrat khawa hoon kohi sakhti maqsood nahin thee sirf apnay baee ko ba-khabr karna thah kay in kay amal ghalt hen aur dosra joh Kabah kee shabeeh kay mutabiq mazar bana bilqul jaiz nahin. Ala Hazrat alayhi rehma ka yeh sher kabi nah boolen, Soona jangal raat handeri, cha-hi badli qaali heh Sonay walo jagtay raho choroon kee rakhwali heh. Yahan chor esay bala kay hen ankh say kajla saaf chora len Teri gathri taqi heh aur tooh nay need sambali heh ... Kuch istera kay ashaar hen, choroon kee rakhwali say be bachen, ... ihtiyat ka daman thamay rakhen aur maslak e Ala Hazrat ko pehlahen, log kia kar rahay hen us ka nah difa karen, Sunniyoon ka behtreen difa yeh heh kay aap Sunniyoon ko basic taleem denh. Namaz, roza, tawheed, shirk, biddat. Agar aap awaam kay amaal ka difa karen gay toh kis kis jahil kay karen gay ... kis kis kay ghayr sharai amalsay barat ka ilaan aap aur meh karen gay ... jab log Tawheed aur Shirk samjen gay toh in Wahhabi hathqandoon meh kohi nahin pansay ga ...

Jee bilqul heh farq heh, magar jis soch ko zehan meh rakh kar banaya gaya heh joh is kee inspiration heh woh wazia nazr aa rahi heh. Jahiloon gumrah aur zindeeqoon kay amal ka difa mat keeya karen. Yeh joh tawaf kar rahay hen kia aap ko nazr nahin aa rahay.

Hammad chawal ibn Chawal heh is kay kazzab honay meh musalman hona chahyeh jitna mirza qadiyani kay kazzab honay par iman heh.