MuhammedAli

Agar kissi kay pass is ka link ho toh please share karen.

Maulana Fazal ur Rehman kay baray meh mujjay ilm nahin kay woh kesay aur kon thay. Magar Imran Hussain Sullah Qulli aur ek bewaqoof banda heh. Pata nahin kistera log is ko suntay hen. Kohi patay ki baat nahin is kay bayanat mein. Hadith kay zahir ko esay gol guma guma kar esay bey tukkay mana karta heh kay Mirza qadiyani ka shagird lagta heh. Jistera Mirza Imam Mahdi walay aur Dajjal walay Ahadith ki taweelat karta thah ... yehni Arya Samaj walay Dajjal hen, Christian missionary Dajjal hen. Is ko bi yahi maharat hasil heh kay bey-tukkay mana biyan karta heh. Hadith meh aya heh kay falan darya sookh jahay ga toh sona niklay ga ... is ka mana yeh keeya, yeh gold nahin balkay American dollar heh. Aur gold nikalnay say rokay janay ka matlab heh kay dollar meh trade nah karo. Is ki sab kahani baazi meh khadam nay sirf ek hee kaam ka point note keeya, qarn ash shaytan meh qarn ka mana ek zamana, ek mukhtasar waqt kay mafoom meh istimal huwa heh. Yehni hadith ka mafoom yeh bataya kay Najd say Shaytan ka ek mukhtasar waqt jari hoga ... joh fit hota heh, keun kay pichlay teenso saloon meh Wahhabiat pehal hee rahi heh ... yeh Wahhabiat ka zamana heh ... in ki jhooti baten bi logh maan kar in kay saath ho jatay hen aur hamari sachi sun kar bi kohi nahin aata, joh peechay guzray hen aur joh ainda zamana ahay ga yeh sab Wahhabiyon ka heh yeh pehal jahen gay aur ham khatam ho jahen gay aur phir ek dafa Islam pehlay ga Madinah say. Imran Hussain ki yahi ek baat heh jis ki agar bunyad yehni qarn ka mafoom darust ho toh meh keh sakta hoon kay darust heh baqi sab chavlen aur baqwasat ka mujmua heh.

Introduction: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: "You will be gathered, bare-footed, naked and not circumcised." He then recited: “As We began the first creation, We, shall repeat it: A Promise We have undertaken: Truly we shall do it.” (21:104) He added, "The first to be dressed on the day of resurrection will be Abraham, and some of my companions will be taken towards the left side and I will say: My companions! My companions! It will be said: 'They renegade from Islam after you left them.' Then I will say as the pious slave of Allah said: 'And I was a Shaheed over them while I dwelt amongst them. When you took me up you were the Watcher over them, and you are a Shaheed to all things. If you punish them they are your slaves. And if you forgive them, Verily you, only you are the all-Mighty, the all-Wise." (5:117) [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H568] This Hadith is source of one of the most popular and well thought of arguments against Hadhir Nazir is; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will negate being Shaheed (i.e. witness). By using words of Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam), on the judgment day when he is found lacking knowledge about some members of his Ummah who had apostatized. An Earlier Response In Nutshell: In an earlier response, which can be read here, it was argued if word Shaheed is in meaning of Shahid (i.e. witness) then his negation is out of humility and respect for Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). And there is precedent for this type of understanding in the following verse 5:109. Where the Quran states Prophets will be asked, how the nations did receive you, and the Prophets due to respect for Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and humility will negate having any kind of knowledge. It was also argued; word Shaheed is not used in meaning of Shahid but it is used in meaning of Raqeeb (i.e. watcher, modern equivalent; security) and Hafeez (i.e. protector). In this context Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is saying, he was Raqeeb/Hafeez over his Ummah until he was alive and he was not Raqeeb/Hafeez over his Ummah after his departure from earth and therefore he is/was not responsible for the apostates. It was also argued that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was emulating the Sunnah of Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam) by uttering the following words and the words do not entirely reflect reality: “And I was a Shaheed over them while I dwelt amongst them. When you took me up you were the Watcher over them, and you are a Shaheed to all things. If you punish them they are your slaves. And if you forgive them, Verily you, only you are the all-Mighty, the all-Wise." [Ref: 5:117] This is akin to Tawaf of Safa and Marwa. The historical reason for running between these two mountains and modern practice are different. She ran between these mountains for sake of help and we run to worship Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and to show strength to disbelievers. So even ‘if’ Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam) did intend to negate his own knowledge because he lacked knowledge about his Ummah same cannot be said about Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). The creed of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) witnessing the deeds of mankind is firmly rooted in Quranic teaching. Therefore it is evident that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) could not have used the phrase in same meaning as Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam) used. Point to note is; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) would be emulating a prophet’s Sunnah to show respect and to be humble about his knowledge and not to negate his own knowledge. The Purpose Of Narrating Earlier Response: The strength of above explanation that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) enacted the Sunnah of Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam) to be humble and show respect to Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and not due to absence of knowledge hinges on the proof that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew the apostates and had fore knowledge regarding their apostasy. Hence this article will only focus on this aspect and establish with clear evidence that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew they were apostates. Why he referred to them as ‘my companions’ and ‘my Ummati’[1] is subject of another objection and another response. Anti Hadhir Nazir Argument In Light Of Evidence: Hadith records that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will attempt to intercede on the behalf of apostates by calling them his companions but Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will remind him that these people are not from his Ummah but they are disbelievers: "… and some of my companions will be taken towards the left side and I will say: My companions! My companions! It will be said: 'They renegade from Islam after you left them.'” [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H568] Another Hadith reveals what else will be said: "Some men from my companions will come to my Lake-Fount and they will be driven away from it, and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'You have no knowledge of what they innovated after you left: they turned apostate as renegades (reverted from Islam).” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H586] It is then that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will utter words of Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam): “And I was a Shaheed over them while I dwelt amongst them. When you took me up you were the Watcher over them, and you are a Shaheed to all things. If you punish them they are your slaves. And if you forgive them, Verily you, only you are the all-Mighty, the all-Wise." [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H568] The opponents argue Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is asked if he knows what these people did after his departure and because he will not know what had happened after his death he will negate being Shaheed over them. Our Principle Response To Anti Hadhir Nazir Argument: Out of the many versions of Hadith quoted above one version is with ہمزہ (ء) of استفہام and matter of principle is that: -نفی کا انکار اثبات ھوتا ھے -جملہ منفیہ پر ہمزہ (ء) استفہام انکاری ھے Therefore ہمزہ استفہام establishes knowledge and not lack of knowledge. Explaining The Meaning Of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام: When in a negative sentence there is ہمزہ (ء) of استفہام negating the negative then that negation of negative means affirmation. Suppose a student in presence of Albert Einstein says to him: You don’t know answer to this question. Note this is a sentence in which knowledge is being negated for Albert Einstein therefore it is a ‘negative sentence’. If there was ء of استفہام on ألف (ا) and it was negating the negative in sentence then it would mean knowing the answer to question because not knowing was negated by ہمزہ (ء) of استفہام. Meaning it has negated ‘not knowing’ part of following sentence and sentence now implies ‘knowing’ the answer: You don’t know answer to this question. The Hadith Of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “I would be on the Cistern so that I would be seeing those who would be coming to me from you, but some people would be detained (before reaching me).” Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) would say: “My Lord, they are my followers and belong to my Ummah and it would be said to me:فَيُقَالُ أَمَا شَعَرْتَ مَا عَمِلُوا بَعْدَكَ وَاللَّهِ مَا بَرِحُوا بَعْدَكَ يَرْجِعُونَ عَلَى أَعْقَابِهِم Which translates into considering ہمزہ (ء) استفہام: “Don’t you know what they did after you?”[2] The angel continues to testify: “By Allah, they did not do good after you, and they turned back upon their heels.” The Hadith ends with narrator of Hadith seeking Allah’s (subhanahu wa ta’ala) protection from apostasy: “He said: lbn Abu Mulaika used to say: O Allah, I seek refuge with Thee that we should turn back upon our heels or put to any trial about our religion.” [Ref: Muslim, B30, H5684] Note the words of Hadith in bold: “Don’t you know what they did after you?” These words indicate that to one being addressed already possesses the knowledge but his attention is being directed toward it, with this rhetorical question. Important Note For Remaining Discussion: The Hadith of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام insinuates fore knowledge therefore if any other Hadith indicates contrary to it then there will be contradiction between Ahadith. Due to presence of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام in the above quoted Hadith we have to assume the implications of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام in every Hadith on related topic and believe ہمزہ (ء) استفہام has been omitted. Example of such omission of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام is in the verses; 2:106, 2:107, 94:1, and 105:1.[3] Yet the translators translated these verses to indicate; one being addressed already possesses knowledge about the topic being a discussed in these verses. Hence all statements of Ahadith, with or without ہمزہ (ء) استفہام , on this subject, which indicate lack of knowledge regarding apostasy will have question mark inserted to indicate rhetorical under tones to convey meaning that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) already possesses knowledge regarding the reality of apostates. To ignore the implications of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام will mean that Ahadith contradict each other. And Ahadith establish; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will recognize the apostates, and they will recognize him, and he will even know names of apostates, and their fathers names, and names of the tribes they belong to, and not just that but even the apostates will know who they are talking to. Considering all these facts, regarding which the evidence will follow, then to translate all related phrases without implications of ہمزہ (ء) استفہام is foolishness and distortion of reality. The Apostates Mentioned In Hadith Will Be Leaders Of People Of Innovation: It is recorded in the following Ahadith that those men who will be turned toward the left will be leaders of innovators: “Some men from my companions will be brought and taken towards the left side, whereupon I will say, 'O Lord, (these are) my companions!' It will be said, 'You do not know what new things they introduced (into the religion) after you?' I will then say as the righteous pious slave …." [Ref: Bukhari, B65, H4740] "Some men from my companions will come to my Lake-Fount and they will be driven away from it, and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'You have no knowledge of what they innovated after you left? They turned apostate as renegades.[4]” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H586] “Narrated Quaggas: "Those were the apostates who renegade from Islam during the Caliphate of Abu Bakr who fought them.” [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H656] These people will not be ordinary innovators because in the Hadith angel stated they innovated [reprehensible] aspects into religion after the death of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Now it is established the people being turned from the Hawd Al Kawthar are leaders of sects of innovators. And some of these leaders were part of apostasy rebellion after departure of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Prophet Knows Names Apostates And Will Recognize Apostates: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew the names of leaders of tribulations (i.e. Fitnah) and their father’s names, and their tribes, up till the judgment day, and told they will be more than three hundred in numbers: “I swear by Allah, I do not know whether my companions have forgotten or have pretended to forgot. I swear by Allah that the Apostle of Allah did not omit a leader of Fitnah up to the end of the world. Whose followers reach the number of three hundred and upwards but he mentioned to us his name, his father's name and the name of his tribe.” [Ref: Abu Dawood, B35, H4231] Hence he knew who will be the leaders of apostasy from his contemporizes and he recognized them. Following Hadith establishes that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will recognize the apostates and they will recognize him on Hawd Al Kauthar: “The Prophet said, "While I was sleeping, a group (of my followers were brought close to me), and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from amongst (us) me and them … Then behold! (Another) group (of my followers) were brought close to me, and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from (me and them) he said (to them); Come along.' I asked, "Where?' He said, 'To the Fire, by Allah.' I asked, What is wrong with them?' He said …” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H587] “The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor (forerunner) at the Lake-Fount, and whoever will pass by there, he will drink from it and whoever will drink from it, he will never be thirsty. There will come to me some people whom I will recognize, and they will recognize me, but a barrier will be placed between me and them." [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H585] Confirmation Of Derived Understanding From Ahadith: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will not only recognize them at Hawd Al Kauthar but will also know the lineage of each and every leader of innovation/apostasy. The following Hadith establishes that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will recognize the apostates and will recall their Nasab once Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) poses rhetorical question to him: "You think my nearness to my tribe will not benefit them? By Allah, nearness to me [via blood relation] will be rewarded on earth and in hereafter. On judgment day a tribe will be raised who will be ordered to go toward the left. One will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. Another will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. I will say; without doubt I recognize your ancestry but you innovated after me and you became apostates by turning on your heels."[5] [Ref: Msnd Ahmad, Baqi Msnd Al Muksireen, Sa’id Khudri, Hadith 11284] From the following Ahadith it is clear that Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) did not state the Nasab of apostates nor there is another Hadith in which Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) had informed him of Nasab of apostates on judgment day: 'It will be said, 'You have no knowledge of what they innovated after you left: they turned apostate as renegades?” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H586] “O Lord, (these are) my companions!' It will be said: 'You do not know what new things they introduced (into the religion) after you?” [Ref: Bukhari, B65, H4740] So it cannot be argued that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) merely regurgitated what Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) had informed him on judgment day. This establishes, Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) had recalled from his memory what he already knew during earthly life and during which he informed about leader of every Fitnah: “I swear by Allah, I do not know whether my companions have forgotten or have pretended to forgot. I swear by Allah that the Apostle of Allah did not omit a leader of Fitnah up to the end of the world. Whose followers reach the number of three hundred and upwards but he mentioned to us his name, his father's name and the name of his tribe.” [Ref: Abu Dawood, B35, H4231] Discussed Evidence In Perspective Of Islamic Understanding: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will be at Hawd Al Kawthar when a group of people will be prevented from reaching him and will be taken toward left and a group toward right[6] and he will remonstrate with Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) that they are his companions. Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will point out to him that they became apostates. This much is evident from the following Hadith: "You will be gathered, bare-footed, naked and not circumcised." He then recited: “As We began the first creation, We, shall repeat it: A Promise We have undertaken: Truly we shall do it.” (21:104) He added, "The first to be dressed on the day of resurrection will be Abraham, and some of my companions will be taken towards the left side and I will say: My companions! My companions! It will be said: 'They renegade from Islam after you left them.'” [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H568] Another version of same account adds that Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will also state that the apostates innovated after the death of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). And following Hadith is evidence of this: “... and added, "The first man who will be dressed on the Day of Resurrection, will be Abraham. Lo! Some men from my followers will be brought and taken towards the left side, whereupon I will say, 'O Lord, (these are) my companions!' It will be said: 'You do not know what new things they introduced (into the religion) after you?'”[7] [Ref: Bukhari, B65, H4740] Rhetorical statement of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will remind Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) that these men are apostates. Then he will say: Without doubt I recognize your lineage but you innovated after me and retreated on your heels and became apostates. Then considering the being of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and His knowledge, in state of humility and respect for Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will utter the words of Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam): “' Then I will say as the pious slave of Allah said: 'And I was a Shaheed over them while I dwelt amongst them. When you took me up you were the Watcher over them, and you are a Shaheed to all things. If you punish them they are your slaves. And if you forgive them, Verily you, only you are the all-Mighty, the all-Wise." (5:117) [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H568] He will say this, not to negate his witnessing or knowledge regarding the apostates but because the One posing rhetorical question was Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and He knows it all and nothing needs to be told to Him. Hence Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will completely deny being Shaheed due to respect for Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and in selfless humility. An example of such respect and humility is in the following verse where Prophets will completely deny having any knowledge regarding how their nations received them: "On the Day when Allah will gather the Messengers together and say to them: "What was the response you received (from men to your teaching)?" They will say: "We have no knowledge, verily, only You are the All-Knower of all that is hidden (or unseen)." [Ref: 5:109] Anger Of Allah And Its Implications: Respectful and humble students negate their own knowledge if the teacher enquires something from them in state of anger. Prophets honor Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) as he is to be honored. Following Hadith establishes that Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will be extremely angry, like never before: “On that Adam will reply, 'My Lord is so angry as He has never been before and will never be in the future; (besides) He forbade me (to eat from) the tree, but I disobeyed (Him), (I am worried about) myself! Myself! Go to somebody else; go to Noah.”[8] [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H556] Due to this anger and majesty of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) the Prophets will show Him utmost respect, which He deserves. And they will display selfless humility by completely negating own knowledge (5:109). Prophet Isa (alayhis salaam) and Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will negate being Shaheed as mark of respect for Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and as display of humbleness. Humility has home in Prophets of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and they are most respectful of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) in creation. Far more respectful of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) then a student is of his teacher and far more humble about their own knowledge then a student is in presence of his teacher. Conclusion: It was established that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) in his life time foretold who the leaders of innovations would be, including their names, names of their fathers, and the tribes they belonged to. He also said he will recognize them and they will recognize him on judgment day. Considering all this information it is apparent that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will not deny his station Shaheed because he was not Shaheed (i.e. witness) over actions of his Ummah. Instead there has to be another reason. Muslims believe Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will deny his station of Shaheed out of humility and respect for Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). This is just like the Prophets including Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam), who will deny having any knowledge about how their own nations received them despite knowing all too well how they were received. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi Footnotes: - [1] “Therefore turn to thy Lord for prayer and offer sacrifice, and surely thy enemy is cut off (from the good). Then he (the Holy Prophet) said: Do you know what Kauthar is? We said: Allah and His Messenger know best. The Prophet said: It is a canal which my Lord, the Exalted and Glorious has promised me, and there is an abundance of good in it. It is a cistern and my people would come to it on the Day of Resurrection, and tumblers there would be equal to the number of stars. A servant would be turned away from (among the people gathered there). Upon this I would say:رَبِّ إِنَّهُ مِنْ أُمَّتِي (i.e. My Lord, he is one of my people). And He (the Lord) would say: You do not know that he innovated new things (in Islam) after you. Ibn Hujr made this addition in the hadith:" He (the Holy Prophet) was sitting amongst us in the mosque, and He (Allah) said: (You don't know) what he innovated after you" [Ref: Muslim, B4, H790] - [2] In the online translation the phrase is translated as: “…and it would be said to me: Do you know what they did after you? By Allah, they did not do good after you …” Yet in other places the words أَمَا شَعَرْتَ were translated to mean: “The Prophet said, "Expel it from your mouth. Don't you know that we do not eat a thing which is given in charity?" [Ref: Bukhari, B24, H568] “As for al-Abbas, the uncle of the Messenger of Allah, I shall be responsible for it and an equal amount along with it. Then he said did you not know that a man’s paternal uncle is of the same stock as the father or his father?” [Ref: Abu Dawood, B9, H1619] In both places affirmation of knowledge is being indicated and not negation. - [3] I have compared Arabic scripts of Quran from subcontinent and Saudi script published by Darus Salam and noted the difference in the scripts. Arabic scripts from subcontinent, published by Sunni, Deobandi, and Ghair-Muqalideen do not have ہمزہ (ء) استفہام on alif of a’lam on these verses but the Saudi published script ہمزہ (ء) استفہام is part of Arabic script. If the subcontinent script is correct then implication is obvious; ہمزہ (ء) استفہام was omitted from these verses and despite this scholars translated the verses keeping ہمزہ (ء) استفہام in perspective. Of course other side is; ہمزہ (ء) استفہام was part of script and in subcontinent it was omitted but its implications were always considered in understanding of the verses. My research on this issue has lead me to believe; traditionally ہمزہ (ء) استفہام was not part of script in these verses but the Saudi’s have inserted it into script because ہمزہ (ء) استفہام was intended to be part of it in meaning. - [4] There is indication that the apostates will be guilty of committing major Kufr and will not intend to become apostate. Then they would revert to Islam by professing Islamic fundamentals once again without intending to become Muslim but that will be accepted, and the cycle will continue. Evidence of this is in the following Hadith: “Then will be brought some men of my followers who will be taken towards the left (i.e., to the Fire), and I will say: 'O Lord! My companions whereupon Allah will say: You do not know what they did after you left them. I will then say as the pious slave, Jesus said, And I was witness over them while I dwelt amongst them (up to) the All-Wise.' (5.117-118). The narrator added: Then it will be said that those people (relegated from Islam, that is) kept on turning on their heels (deserted Islam).” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H533] - [5] Please note, English translation was based on Urdu translation based on the following Urdu translation. Following is the Arabic rendering of the translation and the scanned images of this can be found here and here:حدثنا أبو النضر ثنا شريك عن عبد الله بن محمد بن عقيل عن سعيد بن المسيب عن أبي سعيد الخدري عن النبي أنه قال تزعمون أن قرابتي لا تنفع قومي والله إن رحمي. موصولة في الدنيا و الاخرة إذا كان يوم القيامة يرفع لي قوم يؤ مر بهم ذات اليسار فيقول الرجل يا محمد أنا فلان بن فلان ويقول الخر أنا فلان بن فلان فأقول أما النسب قد عرفت ولكنكم أحدثتم بعدي و ار تددتم على أعقابكم القهقري. [Ref: Msnd Ahmad, Baqi Msnd Al Muksireen, Sa’id Khudri, Hadith 11284] Following is another version of same Hadith and it was taken from IslamWeb Arabic website:حدثنا أبو عامر حدثنا زهير عن عبد الله بن محمد عن حمزة بن أبي سعيد الخدري عن أبيه قال سمعت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول على هذا المنبر ما بال رجال يقولون إن رحم رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لا تنفع قومه بلى والله إن رحمي موصولة في الدنيا والآخرة وإني أيها الناس فرط لكم على الحوض فإذا جئتم قال رجل يا رسول الله أنا فلان بن فلان وقال أخوه أنا فلان بن فلان قال لهم أما النسب فقد عرفته ولكنكم أحدثتم بعدي وارتددتم القهقرى حدثنا زكريا بن عدي حدثنا عبيد الله عن عبد الله بن محمد بن عقيل عن حمزة بن أبي سعيد الخدري عن أبيه قال سمعت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم على المنبر يقول فذكر معناه [Ref: Msnd Ahmad, Baqi Msnd Al Muksireen, Sa’id Khudri, Hadith 10754] - [6] “Ibn Abbas narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: "The people will be gathered on the Day of Resurrection bare-foot, naked and uncircumcised as they were created." Then he recited: "As we begin the first creation, we shall repeat it: A promise binding upon Us. Truly We shall do it. And the first of people to be clothed will be Ibrahim. Among my companions will be some men who are taken to the right (i.e. toward paradise) and to the left (i.e. hell fire). I will say: 'O my Lord! My companions!’ It will be said: 'You do not know what they innovated after you, they continued to be apostates since you parted from them.' So I will say as the righteous worshipper said: If you punish them, they are your slaves, and if You forgive.” [Ref: Tirmadhi, B11, H2423] - [7] “Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: "The Messenger of Allah stood to deliver a Khutbah, he said: 'O you people! You will be gathered before Allah naked and uncircumcised.' Then he recited: 'As We began the first creation, We shall repeat it...' until the end of the Ayah (21:104). He said: 'The first to be clothed on the Day of Resurrection is Ibrahim. Indeed some men from my Ummah will be brought and taken from the left side, so I will say: My Lord! My companion! It will be said: "Indeed you do not know what they innovated after you.' So I shall say as the righteous slave said: 'And I was a witness over them while I dwelt among them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them. If You punish them, they are your slaves, and if You forgive them, Verily you, only you are the all-Mighty, the all-Wise." (5:117/118) I shall be told: 'These people have not ceased turning on their heels as apostates ever since you parted from them.'" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B44, H3167] - [8]“They would come to Noah and would say: O Noah, thou art the first of the Messengers (sent) on the earth, and Allah named thee as a" Grateful Servant," intercede for us with thy Lord. Don't you see in what (trouble) we are? Don't you see what (misfortune) has overtaken us? He would say: Verily, my Lord is angry today as He had never been angry before, and would never be angry afterwards. There had emanated a curse from me with which I cursed my people. I am concerned with only myself, I am concerned only with myself; you better go to Ibrahim (peace be upon him).” [Ref: Bukhari, B65, H4712] “They will go to Ibrahim and say: "O Ibrahim! You are Allah's Prophet and His Khalil among the people of the earth, so intercede for us with your Lord, don't you see what has happened to us?" He will say: "Today my Lord has become angry as He has never before been angry and will never be thereafter. Indeed I uttered three lies." Abu Hayyyan (a narrator) mentioned them in his narration: "Myself! Myself! Myself! Go to someone else! Go to Musa." [Ref: Tirmadhi, B37, H2621] “They would come to Moses (peace be upon him) and say: O Moses, thou art Allah's messenger, Allah blessed thee with His Messenger-ship and His conversation amongst people. Intercede for us with thy Lord. Don't you see in what (trouble) we are? Don't you see what (misfortune) has overtaken us? Moses (peace be upon him) would say to them: Verily. my Lord is angry as He had never been angry before and would never be angry afterwards. I, in fact, killed a person whom I had not been ordered to kill. I am concerned with myself, I am concerned with myself.” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H378]

I do not appreciate being called Akh by you,you're neither my Ukht nor am your akh. Power, healing, and all that is belongs to Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala not in amulets, medicine, shirts or hairs, or on blowing onto things, but yet he has created means of granting it to people. The almighty heals you via medicine, does he not? Could he heal you without medicine? Then why doesn't He? Here is example of all powerful Allah healing eye sight of a Prophet. He granted Prophet Yaqoob alayhis salaam eye sight when he placed Prophet Yusuf alayhis salaam kameez on his eyes: "Go with this shirt of mine, and cast it over the face of my father, he will become clear-sighted, and bring me all your family." [12:93] "Then, when the bearer of the glad tidings arrived, he cast it (the shirt) over his face, and he became clear-sighted. He said: "Did I not say to you, 'I know from Allah that which you know not.'" [12:96] Allah the capable of healing without the kameez healed, with Kameez. If Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala could heal without the Kameez why didn't He? Did Prophet Yusuf believe Allah could heal without Kameez? Then why did he not make dua and ask Allah to heal his father Prophet Yaqoob? If Prophet Yaqoob believed Allah can heal without Kameez then why did he not refuse to put Kameez on face and directly invoke Allah for his eye sight? With regards to amulets, here is Hadith in which Sahabah used Taweez for minors: "Amr ibn Shu'aib (may Allah be pleased with him) said that 'Rasulu'llah(may Allah bless him and grant him peace) taught my father and grandfather a du'a which we would read before going to sleep, to protect us from fear and anguish.We told our elder children to recite this du'a before going to sleep as well.But for those children who were not yet literate, we would write it and then put it around their necks" [Ref: [Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal vol.2] I am absolutely certain the companions were aware just like the mentioned Prophets that power is with Allah (subhanahu wa ta'ala) and He does all, and He can heal with and without amulets and shirts, but question is despite all this why would they use these? Wahhabism is indeed a sect and not just a ordinary sect, it is a Khariji sect, and sect of disbelievers which emerged from Najd, from East of Madinah, place from where sun rises. Hadith records: Narrated Ibn `Umar: (The Prophet) said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." The Prophet again said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." They said again, "Our Najd as well." On that the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the group/horn/head of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, Book 17, Hadith 147] He also foretold that:Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "The main source of disbelief is in the east. Pride and arrogance are characteristics of the owners of horses and camels, and those bedouins who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to Religion; while modesty and gentleness are the characteristics of the owners of sheep." [Ref: Bukhari, B54, H520] Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab the leader of Wahhabi aka Khariji sect was born in Najd and his murderous sect engaged in murder of Muslims ISIS style because he accused the Muslims of Shirk, grave worship, bidda, and members of his sect acting on his teachings killed millions of Muslims, just like Wahhabi Isis in Syria/Iraq is killing thousands of Muslims. Those who follow his group of Satan are all disbelievers. Your excuse that we are not a sect is like saying of every other sect, even the Qadiyanis say we are not a sect we are the Muslims, no one is going to say they are not the Jammat of Muslims, all say we are the Jammat of Muslims. Also with regards to Muhammedi. Brainless woman if having name of AlWahhab isn't postive in your understanding how can you being labelled Muhammedi will make you feel better about your sect? The Qadiyanis call themselves Ahmadi you know Ahmad this is name of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa alihi was'sallam in paradise. Yet despite calling themselves Ahmadi it is no different. Its not the labels which make people feel good or bad its the activities. In your Wahhabi religion, it is permissible to kill Muslims, and your Wahhabi ancestors, killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims under pretext that they are polytheists, and robbed the muslims of their wealth property and raped hundreds of thousands of Muslim women in cities of Makkah and Madinah and took them for slaves and sold them into slavery. If you want to see your Wahhabism of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab al Kafir wal Dajjal then turn on news and watch ISIS in action. That is true representation of Wahhabism. As long as your doctrines are of nullifying Islam of Muslims, accusing them of worshipping graves, killing them because you deem them Mushrik. And raping the wives, sisters, mothers daughters of Muslims because they are wives sisters mothers daughters of those Muslims whom you consider mushrik. You can call your self, Al Wahhabiyyah, Muhammadiyyah, Ahmaddiyah, Najdiyyah, Muslimoon, Mominoon, Ahlul Jannah, what ever you can thnk of, it will mean nothing positive for your sect. Despite the label you choose, you will be from Khawarij and from those who have gone out of Islam into Kufr: "Narrated `Abdullah bin `Umar: Regarding Al-Harauriyya (i.e. Khawarij): The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "They will go out of Islam as an arrow darts out of the game's body.' [Ref: Bukhari, B84, H66] There are two meaning of this example given by PRophet sallallahu alayhi wa alaihi wassallam in the following two Ahadith: "... but they will recite the Qur'an which will not exceed their throats (they will not act on it) and they will go out of Islam as an arrow goes out through the game whereupon the archer would examine the arrowhead but see nothing, and look at the unfeathered arrow but see nothing, and look at the arrow feathers but see nothing, and finally he suspects to find something in the lower part of the arrow." [Ref: Bukhari, B61, H578] Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There will emerge from the East some people who will recite the Qur'an but it will not exceed their throats and who will go out of (renounce) the religion (Islam) as an arrow passes through the game, and they will never come back to it unless the arrow, comes back to the middle of the bow (i.e., impossible happens). The people asked, "What will their signs be?" He said, "Their sign will be the habit of shaving. [Ref: Bukhari, B93, H651] One meaning from above Ahadith is that upon investigation there will be little sign of Islam upon them. The other is that they will go out of Islam and will not return to Islam. You would wonder O but this Hadith doesnt apply to us, we are practicing Muslims, we pray and we fast, and we give charity, this is answered by Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wassallam himsefl: Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "There will appear some people among you whose prayer will make you look down upon yours, and whose fasting will make you look down upon yours, but they will recite the Qur'an which will not exceed their throats (they will not act on it) and they will go out of Islam as an arrow goes out through the game whereupon the archer would examine the arrowhead but see nothing, and look at the unfeathered arrow but see nothing, and look at the arrow feathers but see nothing, and finally he suspects to find something in the lower part of the arrow." [Ref: Bukhari, B61, H578] It is apparent from the first part of Hadith that, Khawarij, the ones whom Prophet said are group of Kufr in East, the ones whom he described as going out of Islam like an arrow, in meaning of going out of Islam and not comming back, and having little mark of Islam upon them, these people will be outwardly so pious that even the Sahabah would be ashamed of their ownselves. These people who would put Sahabah to shame in their actions, these people Prophet said are people of Kufr, who have gone out of Islam and who will not return to Islam. So you have no excuse of having knowldge of Tawheed, or pieity, or fear of Allah, you Wahhabis are people of Kufr. And you are from ahlul Kufr from group of apostates because Wahhabis accuse the great majority of Muslims of Shirk, which is Takfir, which is same as saying you are Kafir. If you make Takfir of Muslim and it is unjustified it returns to one who makes Takfir. Therefore all of Wahhabiyyah is from Ahlul Kufr because you Wahhabis accuse Muslims of major Shirk and Prophet said my Ummah will not worship idols nor you would worship anyone beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta'ala): "I am your predecessor before you, and I am a witness upon you, and I am looking at my Tank just now, and I have been given the keys of the treasures of the world (or the keys of the world). By Allah, I am not afraid that you will worship others besides Allah after me, but I am afraid that you will compete with each other for (the pleasures of) this world." [Ref: Bukhari, Book 59, Hadith 411] He also said: “The thing that I fear most for my Ummah is [minor shirk - worshiping Allah to please people which is] associating others with Allah. I do not say that they will worship the sun or the moon or idols, but deeds done for the sake of anyone other than Allah, and hidden desires.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol.1 B37, H4205] So the apostasy of those who accuse Muslims of Shirk is evident and the words of Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa alihi wassallam are true: "The main source of disbelief is in the east. Pride and arrogance are characteristics of the owners of horses and camels, and those bedouins who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to Religion; while modesty and gentleness are the characteristics of the owners of sheep." [Ref: Bukhari, B54, H520] East is the direction of sunrise, the region of Najd is in East and Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab was from Najd. The Wahhabiyyah are group of Kufr because the false Takfir retruns upon Wahhabis. That is enough in regards to Wahhabism being a Khariji sect. With regards to Hadith of Prophet not fearing his Ummah worshipping idols, sun, moon, you said the Ahadith more authentic says ... You cannot abrogate one Hadith because a stronger Hadith says something else. Did you invent this rule with your Wahhabi wand of innovation? Ulamah do not reject Ahadith because stronger Hadith says something different from weaker one. A conciliatory effort is made to reconcile both Ahadith. Just as we explain one verse of Quran with another, we explain one Hadith with another. Do we reject one verse of Quran for another? Foolish woman this is not the methodology of Muslims and must be unique to your group of satan. Let me explain to you the Hadith you quoted with the Hadith which i quoted. I am going to insert the implications of Hadith: By Allah, I am not afraid that you [myUmmah] will worship others besides Allah [such as sun, moon, idols] after me, but I am afraid that you will compete with each other for (the pleasures of) this world. Let me explain why I inserted the words my Ummah into the brackets. The Hadith you quoted begins with: "I am your predecessor before you, and I am a witness upon you, and I am looking at my Tank just now, ..." Who is this you,you? To whom is he refering to by saying qum/you. One way this can be determined is to find out upon whom he is been sent as a witness. Allah says: "Thus We have made you a just nation, that you be witnesses over mankind and the Messenger be a witness over you." [2:143] Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam is said to be witness over his Ummah in the quoted verse. Hence when he said I am witness over you in the Hadith he meant you my Ummah because he is witness over his Ummah. Hence in the Hadith of you is not Sahabah or a select group of people but entire Ummah, therefore I added the words my Ummah into the Hadith which you quoted as way of explanation of word you/qum. With regards to insertion of sun, moon, idols, that note this was explation of bi-ghairullah. Hence one Hadith explains the other. Hadith of Sahih Bukhari, explains Hadith of Ibn Majah and vice versa. You said: "There is nothing in the hadith to say that shirk (association of others with Allah) will not happen in this ummah; rather it may be understood that he did not fear it for the entire ummah, ..." Lets put your statement in perspective. I am not confident you will be able to grasp this but here goes the effort atleast. Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala states: "And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers." [3:85] Based on this I purpose the sects of innovation will go to hell hence their Islam [in other words sects] will be rejected. The only accepted Islam is the one which goes to paradise and that is Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jammah. What I am trying to say is, there is only one Islam (i.e. Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jammah) and every other sect is not THE Islam. Hence only THE Islam will be accepted and those who are cheap immitations will be rejected. The Jammah whos Islam is accepted is Sawad Al Azam, the great majority: "Anas bin Malik said: “I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say: ‘My nation will not unite on misguidance, so if you see them differing, follow the great majority.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H3950] Based on this Hadith we can soundly conclude the great majority will be upon THE ISLAM which will be accepted and will take them to paradise. Comming back to your statement, the entire Ummah, is wrong, rather he did not fear it for Sawad Al Azam, the great majority. And in fact your Wahhabi sect, whose members can be counted on my ten fingers started with the accusation and is accusing the great majority of Muslims of being Mushrikeen, and not just Mushrikeen but worse then polytheists of pre-Islamic era. Just read Kashf Shubuhat of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab. He even went far as saying only he in the entire world knew meaning of la ilaha il Allah and no one else knew it in his time. That was blanket Takfir of entire Muslim kind except for the sheep and camel violaters that followed him. With regards to your statement: "... based on the fact that it has occurred among some of them, as is indicated in other texts in which he (peace be upon him) stated that some of his ummah would fall into shirk." Those texts, which talk about tribes of his Ummah worshiping Dhil Khilasa, Lat, Uzza, Manat, and people reverting to religion of their fore-fathers, are about specificly about Arabs, and few tribes, and these tribes will worship idols mentioned above, after wind blows which takes life of every believer,. These Ahadith are regarding remaining Arabs who will all be atheistic type of Kafirs, Shaytan will incite them to worship idols of their fore-fathers and they will worship them, Laat, Uzza, Dhi Al Khalasa. Those Ahadith are not about Muslims. I have written extensively on this subject and you can find all of it on IslamiMehfil, English section, in articles and Stories section. name of the fourm is IslamiMehfil ... follow it by this .com/forum/94-articles-and-stories/ and find all the relevent articles which exposes Wahhabi distortions of Ahadith. You quoted Sharh of Imam Nawavi rahimullah alayhi ta'ala. You failed to realized that it supports the position of Muslims. Your Wahhabi sect declares the vast majority of Muslims Mushrik for one or another reason and even you accused Muslims of comitting Shirk.Your Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab in his Risail Al Shaykhiyah declared no one on earth knew meaning of La Ilaha il Allah, do you know what that means, no one before him in his time knew Tawheed. And if no one but him or until he rediscovered it, do you know what that means, all Muslims on earth at his time [he said since 300 years before his discovery] no one knew Tawheed, that means all Muslims were Kafir. And he accused the great majority of Muslims of being Mushrikeen. And your Wahhabi sect of modern times, believes exactly the same, but will not explicitly say everyone else is Mushrik apart from us. So what Imam Nawavi said is refutation to your Wahhabism. With regards to your Ahadith about women of Daws dancing/shaking their buttocks infront of their idols. I am just going to copy past part of my article below. Your evidence were the following Ahadith: 'A'isha reported: I heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza. I said: Allah's Messenger, I think when Allah has revealed this verse: ..." [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] "Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The Last Hour would not come until the women of the tribe of Daus would be seen going round Dhi al-Khalasa (for worship) and Dhi al-Khalasa is a place in tabala, where there was a temple in which the people of the tribe of Daus used to worship the idol." [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6944] Read the following Hadith which you quoted for yourself. It explains when the worship of idols will take place: "'A'isha reported: I heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza. I said: Allah's Messenger, I think when Allah has revealed this verse: "He it is Who has sent His Messenger with right guidance, and true religion, so that He may cause it to prevail upon all religions, though the polytheists are averse (to it)", it implies that is going to be fulfilled. Thereupon he (Allah's Apostle) said: It would happen as Allah would like. Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them. And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers." [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] You read it, only and did not understand it. So let me explain it to your feeble Wahhabi mind. Prophet said: "The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza." Hadhrat Aysha understood the implications of what Prophet said so presented her confusion because she thought what he said contradicted the verse she quoted: "He it is Who has sent His Messenger with right guidance, and true religion, so that He may cause it to prevail upon all religions, though the polytheists are averse (to it)" And then she said: "it implies that is going to be fulfilled." Her last words, it implies that [the said thing in the verse] is going to be fulfilled [because it is a prophesy] and according to it Islam should dominate over all religions. To which Prophet replied: "It would happen as Allah would like." Meaning conquering of Islam and kingdom of Islam over all religions will happen and last as long as Allah wills: "Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them. And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers." In other words, Islam will indeed rule, and then Muslims will die and some tribes of Arabs then will revert to religion of their forefathers (i.e. worship of Lat, Uzza, Dhi AlKhalasa). With this Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam) explained when the people will revert to idol worship, meaning after the Muslims are dead. Therefore this hadith is not evidence that Muslims will worship others beside Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala. Following is also explanation of your evidence and refutation of your claim: "RasoolAllah (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam) said: “... and the Last Hour will not come before the tribes of my people attach themselves to the polytheists and tribes of my people worship idols.” [Ref: Abu Dawood, B30, H4239] in another hadith he explicitly stated about worship of specific idols; Lat and Uzza: “The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] In another hadith Prophet (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam) mentioned a particular tribe worshipping a particular idol: “... the women of the tribe of Daus would be seen going round Dhi al-Khalasa (for worship) and ..." [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6944] This will happen when: “... Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die ...” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] and as a result only: “Only the wicked people would survive and they would be as careless as birds with the charactertistics of beasts. They would never appreciate the good nor condemn evil.” [Ref: Muslim B41, H 7023] “... and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] then shaytan will come to them: “... in human form and would say: Don't you respond? And they would say: What do you order us? And he would command them to worship the idols ...” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H 7023] “And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers." [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] and their idoltory would be in spite of of the fact that: “... they would have abundance of sustenance and lead comfortable lives.” [Ref: Muslim B41, H 7023] “Then only the worst of men will remain to be overwhelmed by the Hour.” [Ref: Muslim, B20, H4721] and as a result of spreading of Shirk all over the earth: “Then the trumpet would be blown and no one would hear that but he would bend his neck to one side (i.e. die) ...” [Ref: Muslim B 41, H 7023] Your saying: "Thus it becomes clear that some of the Muslims will fall into shirk and apostasy, without that affecting the entire ummah, for it is protected against uniting in misguidance." This is nothing but foolishness and lack of understanding of Ahadith. The Ahadith you reffered to were infact talking about idol worship after Muslims are dead, how can these Ahadith be about Muslims when there will be no Muslim left and idol worship will take place after death of Muslims? Your saying: "How can the Muslim doubt that calling upon the dead, beseeching them at times of calamity and asking them to relieve distress are acts of shirk? In fact this is the essence of what the earlier mushrikeen used to do, seeking to draw close to Allah or seeking intercession with Him, as Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And those who take Auliya (protectors and helpers) besides Him (say): "We worship them only that they may bring us near to Allah." Verily, Allah will judge between them concerning that wherein they differ. Truly, Allah guides not him who is a liar, and a disbeliever.”[az-Zumar 39:3] The answer to you is very simple, we are Muslims, and we believe in what Allahs Messenger told us, that his Ummah as whole/majority will be protected from Shirk. Hence we do not accuse Muslims of Shirk nor be over zealous in judgment of about our Muslims brothers. Our hearts are alive and you and your Wahhabi kinds are dead, that is why you have no fear in Takfir of Muslims, nor hold your self, when it comes to barbarity, torture, burning with fire, whole sale genocide of innocent people, drownings, rape and pillage, beheadings on videos and jeering at the dieing, decapitating those who say la ilaha il Allah, showing no remorse, no mercy, barbarity, and lack of mercy are signs of your group: "The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "From this side from the east (i.e. from Najd) afflictions will appear. Rudeness and lack of mercy are characteristics of the rural bedouins who are busy with their camels and cows (and pay no attention to religion). Such are the tribes of Rabi`a and Mudar." [Ref: Bukhari, B56, H702] Wal hamdu lillahi rabbil alameen. Coming to more reasoned response, we do not make Takfir of Muslims nor accuse them of Shirk because we understand, those whom they call, do so without associating illahiyyah to, nor intend to worship them, but believe these are servents of Allah to whom the means of help have been granted and I quoted you Hadith already, and here it is again: “Abdullah bin Ahmed bin Hanbal (rah) said that he heard his father (Imam Ahmed) who said: I performed Hajj 5 times, thrice on foot and twice on ride or he said thrice on ride and twice on foot, once when I was on foot I lost my way hence I started to exclaim this: O Allah’s servants show me the way I kept on repeating this until I came back on track.” [Ref: Shu’ayb ul Iman, Vol6, P128, H7697] Wahhabis like you make Takfir of Muslims by accusing them of committing Shirk because you have no ability to understand Quran or Sunnah and Allah said Quran will not go beyound your throats. Sunnah is extension of Quran meaning both will not be understood by you: "In the end of time there will come a people young in years, foolish in minds, reciting the Qur'an which will not go beyond their throats, uttering sayings from the best of creatures, going through the religion as an arrow goes through the target." [Tirmadhi, B7, H2188] This foolishness if refering to Wahhabi Khariji sect. You in your foolishness assume, that they invoke the servants of Allah because they believe these servants of Allah are their gods, and because they invoke them to worship them. Yet we Muslims know they do not believe in illahiyyah for these servants nor call them with intention of worshiping them nor believe they are worthy of worship. Hence we Muslims do not make Takfir of people and show kindness and mercy. You quoted the following verse: “And those who take Auliya (protectors and helpers) besides Him (say): "We worship them only that they may bring us near to Allah." Verily, Allah will judge between them concerning that wherein they differ. Truly, Allah guides not him who is a liar, and a disbeliever.”[az-Zumar 39:3] Do those who call upon servants of Allah, say we worship them only that they may bring us near to Allah? You minion of Iblees, we worship none but Allah (subhanahu wa ta'ala) and none has the right to be worshiped but Allah and one who worships anyone besides Allah they are polytheists. This verse was revealed for polytheists, and the Awliyah they took, were their gods, they believed their Awliyah are gods beside Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala.This is why Alllah subhanahu wa ta'ala clearly says: "Then do those who disbelieve think that they can take My servants instead of Me as Awliyah? Indeed, We have prepared Hell for the disbelievers as a lodging." [18:102] So those who disbelieved they took Awliyah instead of Allah, and said: "We worship them only that they may bring us near to Allah." [az-Zumar 39:3] You are indeed child of Iblees, woman. Here read the following Hadith: “... and the Mulhidun (heretical) after the establishment of firm proof against them:"And the statement of Allah: 'Allah will not mislead a people after He has guided them, until He makes clear to them what to avoid.' [9:115] And Ibn Umar used to consider them (the Khawarij and the Mulhidun) the worst of Allah's creatures and said: "These people took some verses that had been revealed concerning the disbelievers and interpreted them as describing the believers." [Ref: Bukhari, Vol 9, Page 49, Chap 6: Killing The Khawari] This Hadith fits on you and all Wahhabis because all of you use verses which were revealed for polytheists and apply the hokam on Muslims. You interpret verses revealed for polytheists as if they are describing the creed of Muslims. Awliyah is plural of Wali, and it was used in singular form in the following verse where Allah said: "Your Wali is none but Allah and His Messenger and those who have believed - those who establish prayer and give zakah, and they bow [in worship]." [5:55] Those whom the polytheists took as their Wali are idols/gods and if you take idols/gods beside Allah as your Wali, then you are from the disbelievers, and if one calls upon one who has been taken as god beside Allah, such a person is guilty of Kufr, and a Mushrik for believing in Ma'bood besides Allah. The Walis which Muslims take are believed to be Wali's by Muslims, those who believe none has the right to be worshiped and none is to be worshiped, except Allah, and Walis of believers are, Allah, his Rasool, and the pious believers who have been granted the power to help those in need. And evidence of which is in the following Hadith: Maymuna bint Harith, the blessed wife of Prophet (Peace be upon him) narrates: The Prophet (Peace be upon him) was doing Wudhu for Tahajjud Salaah at the home of Hazrat Maimuna (radi Allahu anha). He suddenly called out three times, "Labbaik, Labbaik, Labbaik!" (Here I am) and "Nusirtu, Nusirtu, Nusirtu!" (I helped you). Hadhrat Maimuna (Radhi Allaho anha) further asked him why he had called out those words". He replied: "Raajiz (a sahabi from far) was calling me because Quraish wanted to kill him"[imam Tabarani in Mu’jam as-Sagheer, Volume No.2, Hadith # 968] Allah has angels on the earth - other than the [two] record-keepers - who keep a record [even] of the leaves that fall on the ground. Therefore, if one of you is crippled in a deserted land where no-one is in sight, let him cry out: Help O servants of Allah Imam al Haytami (rah) said after this hadith: It is narrated by Al-Bazzar and all its narrators are reliable (thiqa) [Reference: Majma uz Zawaid, Volume 10, Hadith No. 17104] Also Allah said: If you two [wives] repent to Allah , [it is best], for your hearts have deviated. But if you cooperate against him - then indeed Allah is his protector, and Gabriel and the righteous of the believers and the angels, moreover, are [his] assistants. [66:4] With this I invite to you THE religion of Islam and stress for you to be from Ahlul Jannah and ahlul Islam you must leave the Wahhabi apostasy which emerged from Najd and be from Muslims. Allah guides whom he wills and leads astray whom he wills. one whom He guids none can misguide ...

Introduction: Muslims believe Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is Shahid (i.e. Hadhir Nazir). The opponents of Islam argue against this belief on the basis of their Satanic logic. Anti Hadhir Nazir arguments are composed of, or based on, half-baked truths. Following is one such argument which was presented during a discussion on this subject. Argument Against Hadhir And Nazir: Hadith records Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: "You will be gathered, bare-footed, naked and not circumcised." He then recited: “As We began the first creation, We, shall repeat it: A Promise We have undertaken: Truly we shall do it.” (21:104) He added, "The first to be dressed on the day of resurrection will be Abraham, and some of my companions will be taken towards the left side and I will say: My companions! My companions! It will be said: 'They renegade from Islam after you left them.' Then I will say as the pious slave of Allah said. 'And I was a Shaheed over them while I dwelt amongst them. When you took me up you were the Raqeeb over them, and you are a Shaheed to all things. If you punish them they are your slaves. And if you forgive them, Verily you, only you are the all-Mighty, the all-Wise." (5:117/118) [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H568] This establishes Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is not Shahid/Shaheed (i.e. Hadhir Nazir). If he was he would know that these people abandoned Islam after his death and were no longer his companions but they are apostates. Methodology Of Refutation: In order to refute the allegation we will have to establish that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew during his life time and will know on the judgment day that they are not companions but apostates. The other part connected to this is; why would Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) say these people are my companions when it is obvious they were not his companions. Answering this question would further clarify the confusion and if Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) permits a separate article will be written to give number of reasons. Prophet Knew They Are Not Companions: Following Hadith establishes that the apostates were amongst the companions: “Narrated Abdullah: The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount and some men amongst you will be brought to me, and when I will try to hand them some water, they will be pulled away from me by force. Whereupon I will say: 'O Lord, my companions!' Then the Almighty will say, 'You do not know what they did after you left, they introduced new things into the religion after you.'" [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H173] Following Ahadith explains that the ‘you’ is directed toward companions: “Narrated Ibn Al-Musaiyab: The companions of the Prophet said, "Some men from my companions will come to my Lake-Fount and they will be driven away from it, and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'You have no knowledge of what they innovated after you left: they turned apostate as renegades (reverted from Islam).” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H586] “Some men from my companions will be brought and taken towards the left side, whereupon I will say, 'O Lord, (these are) my companions!' It will be said, 'You do not know what new things they introduced (into the religion) after you.' I will then say as the righteous pious slave …." [Ref: Bukhari, B65, H4740] We have established Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) has made distinction between his companions and apostates by saying, some men from my companions will be taken toward the left side. This indicates Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) in the world knew they would be apostates and not companions. Also the Hadith itself is proof that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew they would be apostates because he has informed us of an event taking place in distant future. Once he refers to them as his companions Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will pose a rhetorical question as to remind him about the identity of the men: “... Allah's Messenger said: I would be on the Cistern so that I would be seeing those who would be coming to me from you, but some people would be detained (before reaching me). I would say: My Lord, they are my followers and belong to my Ummah, and it would be said to me:فَيُقَالُ أَمَا شَعَرْتَ مَا عَمِلُوا بَعْدَكَ وَاللَّهِ مَا بَرِحُوا بَعْدَكَ يَرْجِعُونَ عَلَى أَعْقَابِهِمْ (i.e. Don’t you know what they did after you?) By Allah, they did not do good after you, and they turned back upon their heels. He …” [Ref: Muslim, B30, H5684] Then Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will remember the Kufri innovations of the men and the identities. Prophet Will Recognize Apostates And They Will Recognize Him: Hadith states Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) would recognize the apostates and they would recognize him on day of judgment: " The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor (forerunner) at the Lake-Fount, and whoever will pass by there, he will drink from it and whoever will drink from it, he will never be thirsty. There will come to me some people, whom I will recognize, and they will recognize me, but a barrier will be placed between me and them.” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H585] Hadith records Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: "While I was sleeping, a group (of my followers were brought close to me), and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from amongst (us) me and them … Then behold! (Another) group (of my followers) were brought close to me, and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from (me and them) he said (to them); Come along.' I asked: "Where?' He said, 'To the Fire, by Allah.' I asked, What is wrong with them?' He said …” [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H587] Further confirmation of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) recognizing the apostates and proof of apostates recognizing Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is in the following Hadith: "One will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. Another will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. I will say; without doubt I recognize your ancestry but you innovated after me and you became apostates by turning on your heels."[1] [Ref: Msnd Ahmad, Baqi Msnd Al Muksireen, Sa’id Khudri, Hadith 11284]They will address Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) by his name indicating they have recognized him and he will recognize them and will know about their ancestry and will be aware of their apostasy. The Apostates Are The Leaders/Creators Of Kufri Innovations: The Ahadith reveal those who were being turned away from the Hawd Al Kauthar were originators of innovations [in other words leaders of heretical sects] and this is evident from the rhetorical tone of question being asked: “Then some men from among my Ummah will be brought and will be taken toward the left. I will say: 'O Lord, my companions.' It will be said: 'Do you not know what they innovated after you were gone?’ And I shall say what the righteous slave said: 'And I was witness over … If You punish them, they are Your slaves, and if You forgive them, verily, You, only You, are the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.' And it will be said: 'These people kept turning away since you left them.'" [Ref: Bukhari, B21, H2089] Question itself implies that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew they created innovations which resulted in their apostasy. Similar meaning can also be taken from the following Hadith: "... Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: I shall be your harbinger on the Reservoir {Al Kauthar}; therefore, be cautious lest one of you should come (to me) and may be driven away like a stray camel. I would ask the reasons, and it would be said to me: You don't know what innovations they made after you? And I would then also say: Be away.” [Ref: Muslim, B30, H5686] It is recorded in Hadith of Hudhayfah Ibn Al-Yaman (radiallah ta’ala anhu) that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will knows names of innovators, tribe they will belong to, and names of their: “I swear by Allah, I do not know whether my companions have forgotten or have been made to forget. I swear by Allah that the Apostle of Allah (sallalahu alayhi was'salam) did not omit in his mention leader of any fitnah to appear up till the end of the world – each would have followers the number of three hundred and upwards, and he mentioned to us his name, his father's name and the name of his tribe.” [Ref: Abu Dawood, B35, H4231] And it is based on this earthly knowledge Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will know the names of innovators, tribes, and names of their fathers when these innovators approach him on the Hawd. And proof of this is in the following Hadith: "One will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. Another will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. I will say; without doubt I recognize your ancestry but you innovated after me and you became apostates by turning on your heels." [Ref: Msnd Ahmad, Baqi Msnd Al Muksireen, Sa’id Khudri, Hadith 11284] Conclusion: It is obvious that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew in his earthly life that those being turned away from Hawd Al Kawthar are not his companions but apostates who introduced Kufri innovations. Also on judgment day Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will know the people being prevented from reaching him are apostates. He will also know the names of these innovators, the tribes they belonged to, and will know the names of their fathers on judgment day. It is also evident that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) will recognize them and they will recognize him on the day of judgment. Hence there is no chance of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) not being truly aware of the reality of these people. At the very minimum it has been soundly established that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) did not address them as companions due to lack of knowledge about their innovations and apostasy. It is yet to be established, the reasons due to which he referred to apostates as his companions and that if Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) permits will be explained in another article, here. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi Footnotes: - [1]"You think my nearness to my tribe will not benefit them? By Allah, nearness to me [via blood relation] will be rewarded on earth and in hereafter. On judgment day a tribe will be raised who will be ordered to go toward the left. One will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. Another will say: O Muhammad! I am so son of so. I will say; without doubt I recognize your ancestry but you innovated after me and you became apostates by turning on your heels." [Ref: Msnd Ahmad, Baqi Msnd Al Muksireen, Sa’id Khudri, Hadith 11284]

Salam alayqum wr wb Meray pass Ihkam e Shariat ka joh nuskha heh us meh bi min anfoosihim kay ilfaaz hen. Quran e kareem kay muadid nuskhay check keyeh hen toh yeh sabat huwa heh kay ilfaaz min amrihim kay hen. Alhasil kam say kam yeh kaha ja sakta heh kay joh ibarat meh darj heh woh ghalat heh. Thori tehqeeq ki, toh maloom huwa kay Quran meh panch jaga min/man kay saath anfoosihim kay ilfaz ahay hen, 2:265, 3:164, 16:89, 33:6, 36:36, shahid is waja say ghalti lagi ho. Abh aya yeh ghalti sayyidi Ala Hazrat alayhi rehma ki heh ya nuskhoon meh publishers kee waja say aahi is par fesla karna mushkil heh. Is ka faisla tab hee ho sakta heh jab Ala Hazrat ka haath say likha huwa nuskha dekha jahay ya kam say kam pehli printing dekhi jahay. Joh halali aur haq aur insaaf pasand heh woh ziyada say ziyada issay Ala Hazrat alayhi rehma ki ghalti tehrahay ga. Magar jis ki asal meh shak heh woh apni bad-asli ki bunyad par bughz o unhealthy amount of kameenay pan ki bina par is ko Tehreef tehra-hay ga aur Sayyidi Ala Hazrat ko is ka ilzam dega. Mujjay aur aap ko essoon say maghz mari ka kia faida? O yeh lenh Deobandiyoon kay Anwar Shah Kashmiri ka aqeeda kay Quran meh manavi aur lafzi tehreef huwi heh. http://www.ja-alhaq.com/deobandi-shocking-faith-of-tehreef-e-quran/

https://www.scribd.com/doc/88344985/Qaher-e-Khuda-Wandi

Behan haq wali jammat Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat heh. Jissay urf e aam meh Barelwi kaha jata heh. Hamaray asal o asool Quran o Sunnat say sabat aur aqahid o nazriat sabat hen. Yeh wahid jammat heh joh saray Quran o Hadith ki talimat kay mutabiq nazriat rakhti heh. Baqi Wahhabi, Deobandi, waghera ek mozoo par kissi ek hadith ko pakr kar beth jatay hen aur ussee mozoo par joh baqi ahadith hotay hen unneh chor detay hen.

In meh say kohi be hadith Taliban kay baray meh nahin aur aksar ahadith is mozoo par zaeef hen.

Agar number mukhtalif hoon toh chapter/bab ka naam dekh leeya karen aur phir Hadith kay shoroon meh sanad hoti heh, joh hadith rawayat kartay hen un kay naam, aap is sanad ki help say doond saktay hen, joh hadith aap nay pari heh us ka pehla dosra aur tesra rawavi note karen, phir us bab meh har ek hadith meh pehlay dosray tesray rawiyoon kay naam dekh lenh jahan par yeh naam barabar aa jahen wohi aap ki hadith heh.

Salam Alayqum, Janab Kitab, Masabih e Sunnat Bajawab Rah e Sunnat aur Mafatih e Sunnat Bajawab Izah e Sunnat, darkar hen. Agar online nahin hen toh jahan say aap nay khareedi hen, agar ho sakkay toh mujjay khareed kar behij denh. kitaboon ka haddiya joh huwa aap pehlay ya baad meh wasool kar saktay hen.

Salam alayqum, bot khoob meray baee, aap is ko baqaida ek naam kay saath publish karen ... kohi munasib nam ho. aur pages kay number likhen parnay meh confusion hoti heh.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/50700040/Tanbeeh-Ul-Juhaal-Rad-e-Takhzeer-Un-Naas Is Kitab ko modern style ka print agar publish heh toh please publisher ka naam batahen, khareedni heh.

Meray baee meh neh english meh bari tafseel say Tawheed ko samajnay kee khatir article likhay hen agar engrezi aati heh toh aap un ko parh lenh. Aur agar kohi Engrezi janta heh aur un ka tarjuma karna chahta heh toh zeroor karen.

Tesri daleel ka jawab: janab yeh Ahle Sunnat ka aqeeda heh kay Allah ta'ala kissi zaat o asbab ka mohtaaj nahin balkay Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala ki har sift khoobi zaati, qulli, haqiqi, qadeemi. Allah ta'ala ka asbab ko ikhtiyar karna majboori nahin magar apnay banahay huway nazam kay mutabiq karta heh. Aur is kay khilaf karnay par qadir heh, jistera pedaish e Isa alayhis salaam say sabat heh. Yeh do article Tawheed kay mozoo par likhay hen: Refuting Khariji Ilah Determining Principles And Interpreting Them According To Thirteen Essential Concepts Of Tawheed. Ilah-Determining Principles Indicate How A Creation Can Be Elevated To Status Of Ilah. Joh hamara apna aqeedah heh us ka ham kia rad karen aur keun karen? Khaas nuqta, yeh Wahhabi Allah ki zaat o sifaat o afaal ko ma fawq al asbab tehra raha heh magar yeh is say pehlay kissi wahhabi nahin likha. Madad, tasurruf o ikhtiyar ko fawq al asbab aur tehat al asbab likha gaya heh magar yeh toh Allah ki hi zaat ko aur sifaat o afaal ko fawq al asbab tehra raha heh. Yeh Wahhabiyoon kay mazhab meh bi biddat hee heh. Yeh istila kissi nay Allah ki zaat o khoobiyoon aur afaal kay leyeh kissi wahhabi nay bi istimal nahin ki. Joh yeh kehna cha raha heh woh hamara aqeeda heh kay Allah ki zaat sifat o afaal sab zaati qadeemi haqiqi qulli daimi bi ghayr izni, waghera ... hen. Magar jis andaaz say yeh likh raha heh pata chal raha heh kay yeh khalis jahil aur Wahhabiat ka bi is ko sahih kar kay patta nahin. Meray donoon article paren in sha Allah Tawheed ko samajnay kay baad aap ko kuch parshaani nahin hogi. Dosri baat yeh ayaat buttoon kay baray meh nazil huwi heh. Neechay wali post ko ghor say paren. Is say yeh sabat hota heh kay yeh ayaat waliyoon aur Nabiyoon kay leyeh nahin thee, balkay insanoon kay leyeh bi nahin thee. Isa alayhis salaam ka parindoon meh jaan dalna aur kehna kay meh isa alayhis salaam esa karta hoon, kia unoon nay ma fawq al asbab par tasarruf ka dawah nahin keeya aur us par daleel nahin dee? Jab dawah bee keeya aur daleel be deeh toh janab ma fawq al asbab par dawa kar kay aap kay mazhab kay mutabiq yeh khuda huway ya nahin? Keun kay aap kay mazhab meh toh ma fawq al asbab ki qudrat sirf Allah ko heh. Baqi Yeh kehna kafi heh kay Allah kay Nabi kay haath say paani nikla, qabr meh musa alayhis salaam ko namaz partay dekha, musallay par kharay thay aur jannat o dozakh dekhi, Agay aur peechay barabar dekhna, jannat meh bilal radiallah anhu kay qadmoon ki awaaz suneeh, waghera ... is meh asbab kia thay aur hen? Agar ankh, qaan, ya kuch ar thay toh tummeh bi aati heh anday ki aulaad?

Salam alayqum, bhai us post meh kohi pattay ki bat nahin jis ka jawab dena zeroori ho. Wesay hee qiyas o baqwas par apna qila khara kar leeya heh us nay. Aap sirf daleel mangen, Quran ya Hadith say, aur joh wazia nah ho qiyas par mabni ho us ko tasleem nah karen, warna shaytaan ka Adam alayhis salaam ko sajda nah karnay ko ham shaytan ki ghayrat e Tawheed bana kar biyan karen toh kia qabool hoga us ko? Mera matlab heh ayaat par qiyasat ko charaya aur man pasand mafoom deeya ja sakta heh. Magar qiyaas wohi darust heh joh taleemat e deen kay mutabiq ho aur kissi wazia pehloo ki nafi nah karay. Janab Ma Fawq Al Asbab Allah kay leyeh khaas tehra rahay hen, magar Isa alayhis salaam ka murdoon ko zinda karna, nabeenoon ko nazr bakshna, parindoon meh jaan bakshna, Dajjal ka murday zinda karna, Ibrahim alayhis salaam ka parindoon ko pukarna ... jab in say us ka ma fawq al asbab ka sirf Allah kay leyeh hona radd ho jata heh toh mazeed kia likhnay kee zeroorat heh. Us ka dawa yeh heh kay ma fawq al asbab par sirf Allah qadir heh aur makhlooq nahin, aur ham nay Quran o Ahadith say is kay khilaf sabat kar deeya toh phir us ka dawa batil huwa. Jab baat itni wazia aur saaf heh toh phir aap samaj jahen kay joh kuch us nay ayaat say sabat karna chaha woh darust nahin ho sakta. Joh baat teen jumloon meh hal ho jahay us par kia zeroorat heh hammeh maghz mari karnay ki.

Barelwiat Talsim e Faraib Ya Haqiqat ka agar kohi link ho toh private message kar deejeeyeh ga. jazakallah khair.

Agar Ala Hazrat nay esa sanad kay mutaliq farmaya heh toh darust heh. Abh Tafsir ka sahih aur ghalat honay ka masla. Shahid waqia hee Ibn Abbas (radiallah ta'ala anhu) ki Tafsir nah ho magar tabeerat e ayat ko ummat kay Ulamah nay qabool farmaya heh. Aur hamari daleel tafsir ka matan hota heh na kay Ibn Abbas radiallah ta'ala anhu ki zaat. Kissi Tafsir ka kisi say mansoob hona aur haqiqat meh us ki tafsir nah hona ayaat ki tafsir ko batil nahin karti. Joh Tafasir Ibn Abbas say mansoob shuda hen wohi Tafasir Ummat kay baqi Ulamah say be sabat hen. Baqi is ko Tafsir Ibn Abbas is waja say kaha jata heh keun kay yeh mashoor issee name say heh. Jistera deoband kay uqabir meh Thanvi, Gangohi, Dehalvi, Nanotavi, Ambethvi, ko bataya jata heh, halan kay haqiqat meh Deoband kay uqabir Ulamah toh Ismail Dehalvi aur us kay shagird hen, yeh Thanvi, Gangohi tabqa saania kay uqabir meh atay hen. Magar keun kay yahi mashoor hen is waja say ineeh ko uqabir ka rutba deeya gaya. Maslak e Ahle Sunnat, dunya kay tamam mumalik meh paya jata heh, aur Ibnul Wahhab say pehlay be qaim aur daim thah ... magar abh Ahle Sunnat ko Barelwiat say mansoob kia gaya heh is leyeh urf meh Ahle Sunnat ki pechaan Barelwi ban gaya. Matlab joh jistera mashoor huwa aur awaam meh istimal huwa us ko issee tera bataya jata heh. Haqaiq kuch be hoon.

Salam alayqum, Joh yeh unoon nay qaida biyan keeya heh us par un say daleel mangen. Yeh us ka mangarat asool heh. Yeh asool o zawabat woh batahen un kee daleel manga karen. Poochen yeh kis Quran o Hadith ka makhaz heh kay- ma fawqal asbab pukar ibadat heh? Aur kia har ma fawq al asbab pukar ibadat heh? in donoon kay jawabat lenh. Jab jawab deh chooken toh phir yeh poochyeh Ibrahim alayhis salaam nay joh murda parindoon ko awaaz deeh aur woh urh kar chalay ahay, ibadat thee ya nahin? Note karen, ek toh parinday murda thay, dosra woh door paharoon par thay ... yeh ma fawq al asbab x2 heh, yehni ek murday ko sunana, aur dosra ussay door say sunana. Aur phir Attahiyat meh, ayyu han-nabiyu ... ayyu harf e nida (pukar) heh, aur RasoolAllah ko pukarna jab kay woh Madina meh hen ... yeh bee ibadat hogi Wahhabiat meh. Agar woh takhsees karta heh kay in in halat meh ma fawq al asbab pukar ibadat nahin toh aap pehlay asool ki, aur phir takhsees kee daleel mangen. In sha allah agar aap nay un say sawaloon kay jawab leeyeh aur phir dalahil deeyeh in sha Allah zaleel o ruswa hoon gay. Zeroorat paray toh mujjay bula leejeeyeh ga in sha Allah Zia Bashir sahib ki tara in ki hawa bi nikal jahay gee. Allah ta'ala aap ka hami o nasir heh.

Salam alayqum Mushtaq baee Allah ta'ala aap ko aur tofeeq deh. Guzarish heh kay scan kay upar kissi aur page ko impose na karen ... donoon saffoon ko ilada rehney denh, cover wala page aur ibarat walay page ko seperate rakha karen ... dosri baat sirf ek he daffa kitab ka cover page laga karen aur phir sirf wohi scan page jis ke zeroorat ho. Is tara sara page saaf rehta heh. jazakallah khair.

In meh say agar kissi kay pass in Sunni Deobandi Kitaboon ka link ho to please share karen: Deobandi: - Saif Yemani - Saif Haqqani - Matraq Haqqani - Iza e Sunnat ba jawab Misbah e Sunnat Sunni: - Masabih e Sunnat Bajawab Rah e Sunnat - Mifta e Sunnat Bajawab Iza e Sunnat Ya kissi ko is Kitab kay radd meh likhi janay wali Sunni kitab ka naam ya link pata ho toh share karen: Tafreeh Al Khawatir Fi Radd Tanweer Al Khawatir, by Sarfaraz Khan Safdar Meh ek data base sribd par bana raha hoon jis meh Deobandiyoon ki kutub aur un kay jawab meh Ahle Islam ki kutub joh un kay radd meh likhi gahi hen woh hoon gi. Is leyeh apeal heh kay Sunni bahi thori madad karen. Joh meh talash nahin kar sakta woh idhar aap say ruju kar raha hoon.

Thori search ki toh Rah e Hidayat jis kay jawab meh likhi gahi woh mujjay mil gahi heh. Noor e Hidayat, Syed Haseen ud Deen Shah Sahib - ghaliban Mufti Hanif Qureshi kay ustad ki likhi huwi heh.

Sarfaraz Khan nay Rah e Hidayat Bajawab Noor e Hidayat joh likhi, is Noor e Hidayat kay musannaf kon hen aur kia yeh kitab net par mil sakti heh.

Salam alayqum Baee aap ihtiraz bata denh, ya phir reference denh, in sha Allah jawab hazir hoga.

جب جملہ منفیہ پر ہمزہ (ء) استفہام انکاری داخل ھوتا ھے تو نفی کا انکار اثبات ھوتا ھے ya جب جملہ استفہامیہ پر ہمزہ (ء) استفہام انکاری داخل ھوتا ھے تو نفی کا انکار اثبات ھوتا ھے Ahle ilm hazrat is guzarish heh kay is meh madad karen. Mera sar chakra gaya heh is ko samajnay ki koshish kar kar kay. Thora dictionary ki madad say samja hoon. English meh article likh raha hoon, aur koshish ki kay tarjuma english meh karoon, magar tarjuma karnay kay leyeh ibarat ko pehlay samajna parta heh, abh nah meh samjoon aur nah tarjuma kar sakoon. Ahle Ilm say guzarish heh kay awal tarjuma hee kar denh, agar nahin toh Allama Qazmi Sahib ki ibarat say akhaz keeyeh huway asool ko hi samja denh. Aur joh meh nay maghz mari kar kay samja hoon yeh darust heh ya nahin?